On 28 Aug 2009, at 06:13, toki...@aol.com wrote:
Brian Akins of Turner Broadcasting, Inc. wrote...
We are moving towards the 'if you say you support gzip,
then you get gzip' attitude.
The only approach that makes sense. Good to hear that from
folks as big as you.
There isn't a
MIME types.
That's a complete separate discussion and I'm not
goint to 'go there' tonight.
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wed, Aug 26, 2009 1:47 pm
Subject: mod_cache, mod_deflate and Vary: User-Agent
On 8/26/09 3:20 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I would write little lua scriptlets that map user agents to two
buckets: supports gzip, doesnt support gzip. store the thing in
mod_cache only twice, instead of once for every user agent.
We do the same basic thing. We are moving
, Aug 27, 2009 9:42 am
Subject: Re: mod_cache, mod_deflate and Vary: User-Agent
On 8/26/09 3:20 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I would write little lua scriptlets that map user agents to two
buckets: supports gzip, doesnt support gzip. store the thing in
mod_cache only twice
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:47 AM, William A. Rowe,
Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I think we blew it :)
Vary: user-agent is not practical for correcting errant browser behavior.
For example;
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Gecko/20090729 Firefox/3.5.2
produces a myriad number of 'variant' flavors
Paul Querna wrote:
Yes, write a Varied header to 'hash' plugin API for mod_cache.
I would write little lua scriptlets that map user agents to two
buckets: supports gzip, doesnt support gzip. store the thing in
mod_cache only twice, instead of once for every user agent.
This doesn't solve
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:50 PM, William A. Rowe,
Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Yes, write a Varied header to 'hash' plugin API for mod_cache.
I would write little lua scriptlets that map user agents to two
buckets: supports gzip, doesnt support gzip. store the thing in
