mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
Hello, is anyone using the mod_ldap module on win32 platform ? We have used it up to build 2.0.48 with (almost) no problems. But we can't get the mod_ldap from 2.0.49 or from the 2.1 to work. The problem is, that apache.exe will crash on the first request who actually does a authentication via

Antw: Re: mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
For Windows 2000 it's included in the bug report. Not sure if it whas for 2.1 or 2.0.50, it crashed in both, and always in the WLDAP32 DLL http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18334 André [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.06.2004 17:17:31 Jess Holle wrote: Hmmm We've had no such

Antw: Re: mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
Hello, I too have downloaded the most current SDK available, but it still crashes. On what Windows are you running the apache server ? Any chance you could send me your mod_ldap.so util_ldap.so for windows ? So I can compare/test them with my modules ? André [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.06.2004

Re: mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Leggett
Jess Holle wrote: On UNIX? See the bug for what details I managed to muster at some point. Can you point out which bug, there were lots that I opened and closed, I just want to make sure I didn't close a bug that should be still open. Regards, Graham --

Re: Antw: Re: mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Andre, Any chance you could send me your mod_ldap.so util_ldap.so for windows ? So I can compare/test them with my modules ? have you tried a build with Netscape SDK? You can get binaries from my site: http://www.gknw.com/development/apache/ however I have not tested ldap on Win32 for

Re: mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Jess Holle
My feedback was mainly attached to bug #18756. This bug is still present in 2.0.49. I do not know if it is a true duplicate as indicated or not. I just know it does not work. I also had reported 24801 (crash on cache overflow). I believe I tested it with the fix for bug #29207 some time back

Re: mod_ldap Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Leggett
Jess Holle wrote: My feedback was mainly attached to bug #18756 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18756. This bug is still present in 2.0.49. I do not know if it is a true duplicate as indicated or not. I just know it does not work. I also had reported 24801