On 01.05.2015 17:11, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I believe SSL_X509_INFO_load_path() should be inlined into
its only caller.
I'm +1 for this. The Low-Level CA Certificate Loading part in
ssl_util_ssl.c is / was only used by ssl_init_proxy_certs, so I would be
in favor of also moving
I believe SSL_X509_INFO_load_path() should be inlined into
its only caller. I'd like some eyes on this change since
it's not just mechanical.
The desired behaviour seems to be load as many certs as possible
from a directory, looping over its file entries. Ignore errors,
e.g. in case the file is
