Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-19 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/18/2007 07:40 PM, Roy T.Fielding wrote: On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: This works as designed. Please see the difference between the accept headers sent by IE6 and Firefox IE6: Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Firefox: Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2007-09-18 at 22:41 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Agreed. Depending on the answers above we may need to have a list of headers (like Accept-Encoding) where we compare the tokens in the field-value. For all other headers we would stay with the plain compare we do today. See also the

new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Fernando - Dfcom
Hi, I'm developing a webaccel project and I am trying to use apache to do that. I'm choosing apache because squid does not support natively http/1.1 compression. The main resources are: security (mod_security), saving bandwidth (mod_deflate) and lowering backend servers load

AW: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Fernando - Dfcom Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 16:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: new webaccel appliance debian:/cache# grep 'fd.jpg?' * -r Binary file 3IT/6la/Omd/Jn@/287/BxY4K0g.header.vary/uaR/FRo/84M/RjT/oFp/MO

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Roy T . Fielding
On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: This works as designed. Please see the difference between the accept headers sent by IE6 and Firefox IE6: Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Firefox: Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate IE6 adds an additional space between gzip and

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2007-09-18 at 19:40 +0200, Roy T.Fielding wrote: Argued? The space does not change the value of the field (which is a comma-separated list). The question is really up to us as to how much effort we make to compare the values for equality, since the non-match just makes our cache

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Fernando - Dfcom
Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:46 PM Subject: Re: new webaccel appliance

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Andreas Kotes
Hello, * Fernando - Dfcom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070918 22:06]: In RFC 2616 I found: An HTTP/1.1 server SHOULD include a Vary header field with any cacheable response that is subject to server-driven negotiation I don't know if removing Vary header is rfc-compliant, but resolves the

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-18 Thread Fernando - Dfcom
parse mistake). Best Regards, Fernando - Original Message - From: Andreas Kotes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:56 PM Subject: Re: new webaccel appliance Hello, * Fernando - Dfcom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070918 22:06]: In RFC 2616 I found

new webaccel appliance - new question

2007-09-18 Thread Fernando - Dfcom
Hi, Regarding this new webaccel project (hardware appliance) I was wondering about some points: - Use Freebsd S.O - Tuning kernel and let it as small as possible. - Enable Sendfile; - Use AcceptFilter and accf_http - --enable-nonportable-atomic=yes