Re: svn commit: r1769669 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-merge-http-strict: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 22.12.2016 um 18:25 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: > >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Eric Covener > > wrote: >> >> I think the log severity changes below could use

Re: svn commit: r1769669 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-merge-http-strict: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

Am 22.12.2016 um 18:25 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Eric Covener > wrote: I think the log severity changes below could use some eyes, especially in context of 2.2. Are these lowered because they're redundant?

Re: svn commit: r1769669 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-merge-http-strict: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > I think the log severity changes below could use some eyes, especially > in context of 2.2. Are these lowered because they're redundant? I > haven't yet looked. > > I am tempted to leave the old severities for 2.2 and

Re: svn commit: r1769669 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-merge-http-strict: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

I think the log severity changes below could use some eyes, especially in context of 2.2. Are these lowered because they're redundant? I haven't yet looked. I am tempted to leave the old severities for 2.2 and wait and see if it's confusing in 2.4 (should not have to enable DEBUG to see the