Hi --
Chris Darroch wrote:
Much appreciated, but alas, Justin pointed out a serious conflict
in mod_authz_svn, and more generally, various modules may exist out
there that are also expecting authnz functions to be called for every
sub-request that has a different URI/filepath.
[snip]
On 12/29/06, Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main trick here is that instead of the hard-coded version
string 0 for authn/z providers, AUTHN/Z_PROVIDER_VERSION_ALL_REQ and
AUTHN/Z_PROVIDER_VERSION_INITIAL_REQ are defined.
Without looking at the code, I'd hope that means that they
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Without looking at the code, I'd hope that means that they are version
1 providers. =) -- justin
Yes, that's what I used, although I wondered if that was ideal, or
whether it should be something like 0-initial-req-only ... but 1
seemed less ugly to me. :-)
Hi --
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It so happens I'm starting one of those cycles again right now with the
changes to the mis-handling of file matches that Nick(?) corrected in
trunk, and I'll study your patch in tandem. Thanks for your work!!!
Much appreciated, but alas, Justin pointed
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:06:16 -0800
Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi --
The short version of this email is, please, can people review
this patch for server/request.c and see if it breaks anything?
There are versions for trunk and 2.2.x. Thanks in advance!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 14:34
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
In this instance, we need to work through how this relates to
relevant updates leading to the CHANGES file entry:
core: Do not allow internal redirects like the
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:41:39 +0100
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this instance, we need to work through how this relates to
relevant updates leading to the CHANGES file entry:
core: Do not allow internal redirects like the DirectoryIndex
of mod_dir to
On 12/6/06, Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi --
The short version of this email is, please, can people review
this patch for server/request.c and see if it breaks anything?
There are versions for trunk and 2.2.x. Thanks in advance!
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:06:16 -0800
Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What surprised me was discovering that each sub-request (or,
equally, internal redirect) went through the authnz steps despite
the fact that I just had a single blanket authnz configuration for
the entire directory
On 12/6/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A corresponding authz hook will implement a Require inherit
to enable subrequests with inherited set to be authorized,
and will run ahead of normal authz hooks.
Would that be a good solution here?
I think you mean that if they have 'require
Hi --
Thanks for taking an initial look at these patches; I reviewed
them a bit more as well and did some testing this morning which
resulted in a pair of small changes. One of those changes is important;
it catches the condition where the current walk finds additional
matches beyond those
Hi --
The short version of this email is, please, can people review
this patch for server/request.c and see if it breaks anything?
There are versions for trunk and 2.2.x. Thanks in advance!
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/walk_cache/
I recently finished setting up mod_dav
12 matches
Mail list logo
