packaging was very good. Just a few warning messages about PKG_CONFIG_PATH
and openssl. Was discussed earlier in a thread, so it seems harmless.
build/aix/buildaix.ksh worked very well with the IBM compiler - AND - apr
and apu pre-compiled and installed (so did not use srclib/apr,
srclib/apr-util
Packaging went well, but still several compiler syntax warnings. Also, a
configure warning - that I hope has no influence:
configure: WARNING: Your APR does not include SSL/EVP support. To enable
it: configure --with-crypto
as I have --enable-ssl in the 2.2.24 configure while 2.4.X is using merely
On 19 Feb 2013, at 10:12 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Packaging went well, but still several compiler syntax warnings. Also, a
configure warning - that I hope has no influence:
configure: WARNING: Your APR does not include SSL/EVP support. To enable it:
configure --with-crypto
On 19.02.2013 04:35, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine but operation now fails on all mysql auths (included APR
problem from -deps ??)
reports: APR-util Version: 1.5.1
[Tue Feb 19 13:16:33.487932 2013] [auth_basic:error] [pid 24811:tid
2996689776] [client xxx] AH01617: user noel:
finally got smart to svn checkuot the right tests (had been blind in one
eye and not looking out the other
summary of httpd-test:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
so, it is intended that mod_crypto is not included with
--enable-mods-shared=all (and/or --enable-mpms-shared=all)?
If so, I shall add --with-crypto to the configure command in the build
script.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 19 Feb 2013, at 10:12
On 19 Feb 2013, at 1:57 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
so, it is intended that mod_crypto is not included with
--enable-mods-shared=all (and/or --enable-mpms-shared=all)?
There is no such module as mod_crypto, rather a module called
mod_session_crypto. This module uses simple
A simple check would be to rebuild 2.4.3 but using the -deps
from 2.4.4...
On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 23:23 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
in -deps is only 1.4.6, but APR-utils is 1.5.1
have tested
thanks. Will update apr-util and try again.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 19 Feb 2013, at 1:57 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
so, it is intended that mod_crypto is not included with
--enable-mods-shared=all (and/or
That seems to have cleared that message.
Now the test part going difficult.
Is the test wrong, or am I missing something with the build?
./configure \
--enable-layout=$LAYOUT \
--with-apr=$apr_config \
--with-apr-util=$apu_config \
p.s. this is what I have for mod_auth*
ls -l /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 12316 Feb 19 17:17
/opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth_basic.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 61826 Feb 19 17:17
/opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth_digest.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 39720 Feb 19 17:17
On 18.02.2013 21:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.4 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.4 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
p.s. this is what I have for mod_auth*
ls -l /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 12316 Feb 19 17:17
/opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth_basic.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1
Am 19.02.2013 18:03, schrieb Rainer Jung:
On 18.02.2013 21:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.4 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.4 GA.
NOTE: The -deps
On 19.02.2013 18:06, Eric Covener wrote:
authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later.
... which means: don't simply try to a run a 2.2 config under 2.4.
Rainer
Hmmm I'm not seeing crashes, but I'm seeing weird output
from server-status. When I do a graceful, all of a sudden
there are entries in 'Request' (OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0) when
there shouldn't be. This is with Prefork.
Looks like some scoreboard issue...
On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Rainer Jung
Never mind... this is expected. It's been awhile since I looked
at that codepath.
FWIW, not seeing crashes on any MPM yet on OSX.
On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Hmmm I'm not seeing crashes, but I'm seeing weird output
from server-status. When I do a
On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 18:03, schrieb Rainer Jung:
Plattform is Solaris 10 Sparc. I would be interested in hearing if
anyone else can reproduce. Will try myself on Linux later
at least not on Fedora 18 with my custom
Thought I had cleaned it all up. Seems to not be so. Will try again later.
Thx!
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 19.02.2013 18:06, Eric Covener wrote:
authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later.
... which means: don't simply try to a run a
On 19.02.2013 18:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Never mind... this is expected. It's been awhile since I looked
at that codepath.
FWIW, not seeing crashes on any MPM yet on OSX.
And after a graceful restart with two listeners the old processes (apart
from the parent) are no longer in the process
On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 19.02.2013 18:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Never mind... this is expected. It's been awhile since I looked
at that codepath.
FWIW, not seeing crashes on any MPM yet on OSX.
And after a graceful restart with two
On 19.02.2013 19:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 18:03, schrieb Rainer Jung:
Plattform is Solaris 10 Sparc. I would be interested in hearing if
anyone else can reproduce. Will try myself on Linux later
at
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
Short version: child processes that do not manage to acquire the accept
mutex during graceful restart and before the next generation child
processes
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
maybe https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49504 ?
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 07:34 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A simple check would be to rebuild 2.4.3 but using the -deps
from 2.4.4...
Close... 2.4.3 with 2.4.4 -deps fail *but* 2.4.4 with
-deps from 2.4.3 *works*
So as I suspected it is something in 2.4.4. APR/ APR-util as
On 20.02.2013 01:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
Short version: child processes that do not manage to acquire the accept
mutex during graceful restart
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:03 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
LogLevel info auth_basic:trace8 authn_dbd:trace8
Thanks
I checked whether the patch compiles fine, but haven't tested it, so
careful if applying to production.
no problem this is only on dev at present.
NOTE: passwords returned in
On 20.02.2013 01:20, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
maybe
On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 07:34 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A simple check would be to rebuild 2.4.3 but using the -deps
from 2.4.4...
Close... 2.4.3 with 2.4.4 -deps fail *but* 2.4.4 with -deps
from
That is one ugly bug...
On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 20.02.2013 01:20, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup
On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 07:34 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A simple check would be to rebuild 2.4.3 but using the -deps
from 2.4.4...
Close... 2.4.3 with 2.4.4 -deps fail *but* 2.4.4 with -deps
from
On 20.02.2013 01:39, Noel Butler wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:03 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, so we know it is correctly retrieving the hash and the aces control
really fails in the apu password_validate.
Next: Could you please
grep CRYPT /path/to/build/apache/srclib/apr-util/config.status
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 02:20 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
grep CRYPT build/apache/srclib/apr-util/config.status
D[HAVE_CRYPT_R]= 1
D[CRYPT_R_STRUCT_CRYPT_DATA]= 1
| I'd like to check, whether your platform has CRYPT_R_CRYPTD or
CRYPT_R_STRUCT_CRYPT_DATA defined. If it is the latter, then what OS
Just a reminder that I'd like to take all this feedback and gather
further dev discussion at the hackathon this coming Monday to get
us closer to 2.4 (and perhaps, a more quickly-adopted 2.6/3.0).
Please join if you can get to Portland this coming Monday :)
TIA,
Bill
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:20:55 +0100
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 20.02.2013 01:39, Noel Butler wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:03 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, so we know it is correctly retrieving the hash and the aces
control really fails in the apu password_validate.
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 23:31 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Note he mentioned SHA512, not crypt(). I don't know that this makes
a difference on that architecture.
But isn't it just a hand off to system crypt() (modern crypt(), not the
ancient 8 char one), since httpd is limited in
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:42:56 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 23:31 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Note he mentioned SHA512, not crypt(). I don't know that this makes
a difference on that architecture.
But isn't it just a hand off to
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 01:07 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:42:56 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 23:31 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Note he mentioned SHA512, not crypt(). I don't know that this makes
a
38 matches
Mail list logo
