+1
Regards
Rüdiger
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Eissing
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 12:13
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1869499 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/build/apr_common.m4
>
> +1
>
> > Am 07.11.2019 um 12:04 schrieb Yann
Il giorno gio 7 nov 2019 alle ore 16:49 Yann Ylavic
ha scritto:
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:47 PM Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
> > > . non-Unix, single-platform code
> > > . routine APLOGNO() backports
> > > . .gdbinit
> > > +. Travis integration:
Le 07/11/2019 à 11:31, Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group a écrit :
C2 General
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Yann Ylavic
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 11:19
An: httpd-dev
Betreff: Re: Integration tests running on Docker
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:54 PM Joe Orton wrote:
Has
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 11:19
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: Integration tests running on Docker
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:54 PM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody seen t/modules/deflate.t and
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Am I missing something?
A brain or something like that :)
Nevermind, I was just confused by the name of $deflated_str_q0, this
string isn't actually deflated because of q=0.
Since this test passes on trunk, a backport is missing possibly?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:31 AM Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> I suspect that $deflated_str_q0 is the result of the request with
> Accept-Encoding: gzip;q=0
> where mod_deflate actually should not gzip the response because of q=0.
Yeah, brain fart :)
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 11:32
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: Integration tests running on Docker
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> A brain or
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:31 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Since this test passes on trunk, a backport is missing possibly?
Yep, r1868313, proposed in STATUS already.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:01 PM wrote:
>
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Thu Nov 7 11:01:48 2019
> New Revision: 1869499
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1869499=rev
> Log:
> Use latest/compatible apr_common.m4.
Or should we remove this file from the repository since it's generated
by
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:54 PM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Has anybody seen t/modules/deflate.t and t/modules/brotli.t fail on
> Debian-ish distro? I don't remember seeing this before but maybe it's
> something
> trivial? t/TEST output -
It seems to originate from r1868312.
I don't really understand
Hi everybody,
if you build httpd for Windows can you give us a list of commands and
steps that you usually do? I am not familiar enough with the platform
and [1] is still a bit cryptic to me :)
The end goal is to add the build steps to our Travis config, to run
them every time that a commit
+1
> Am 07.11.2019 um 12:04 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:01 PM wrote:
>>
>> Author: ylavic
>> Date: Thu Nov 7 11:01:48 2019
>> New Revision: 1869499
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1869499=rev
>> Log:
>> Use latest/compatible apr_common.m4.
>
> Or should
Should I backport this removal to 2.4.x? CTR?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> r1869500
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:31 PM Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Rüdiger
> >
> >
> > C2 General
> >
> > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:37:50AM +, Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> r1868314
Ah, thank you! Obviously I tested this locally first too but hadn't
updated my test/framework directory... duh.
Should we use RTC or can I get an exception for 2.4.x travis
integration? I have a few
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
> . non-Unix, single-platform code
> . routine APLOGNO() backports
> . .gdbinit
> +. Travis integration: .travis.yml and test/travis*.sh
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:47 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
> > . non-Unix, single-platform code
> > . routine APLOGNO() backports
> > . .gdbinit
> > +. Travis integration: .travis.yml and test/travis*.sh
>
> +1
+1
+1
> Am 07.11.2019 um 13:12 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> Should I backport this removal to 2.4.x? CTR?
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> r1869500
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:31 PM Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
+1.
This makes 3 +1 on list so we are now RTC and go for it :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Eissing
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 13:14
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1869499 -
>
r1869500
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:31 PM Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
> C2 General
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Stefan Eissing
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 12:13
> > An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: svn
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:19 AM Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
>
> On 10/28/2019 10:54 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > Once/if backported, I plan to completely remove the base vhost from
> > the game, in trunk (usual merging applies).
>
> So you want to revert r1868929 after the backport?
Yes, exactly.
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
