Re: mod_wasm: Contributing Upstream to Apache

2023-01-24 Thread Joe Schaefer
It is impossible to run mod_h2 without it or similar. On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:37 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > We are still very interested in contributing this module upstream and > helping to maintain it. Please, let us know what improvements or changes > would be needed for it to be

Re: mod_wasm: Contributing Upstream to Apache

2023-01-24 Thread Jesús González
Hola! I wanted to update you on our progress since we have recently published new WebAssembly builds for several language runtimes, including: - PHP 8.1.11 and 8.2.0 - Python 3.11.1 - Ruby 3.2.0 With the inclusion of multi-module support in the mod_wasm v0.10.0 release, Apache can now serve

Re: mod_wasm: Contributing Upstream to Apache

2023-01-24 Thread Eric Covener
> We are still very interested in contributing this module upstream and helping > to maintain it. Please, let us know what improvements or changes would be > needed for it to be considered ready for inclusion. As a pessimistic PMC member not caring about WASM or these languages, I worry that

Re: mod_wasm: Contributing Upstream to Apache

2023-01-24 Thread Joe Schaefer
Would be great to marry it to apreq, too. On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 4:04 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > It is impossible to run mod_h2 without it or similar. > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:37 PM Eric Covener wrote: > >> > We are still very interested in contributing this module upstream and >> helping