Since I get no further feedback, I'm going to commit this soon, unless someone
objects/comments on it.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---
Hello,
I am building a message protocol on top of TCP for which I modified the
WSASend() and its sister functions to attach a header to every packet and
WSARecv() functions to recognize the header. Since I cannot do the same
with the TransmitFile() and AcceptEx() functions, I need to disable
Graham Leggett wrote:
Neil Gunton wrote:
The problem now is that the browsers (IE and Mozilla at least) don't
seem to differentiate requests based on cookies. I have tested
requesting a page with a certain cookie (where the page has a sufficient
expiration to warrant being cached for
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 04:42, Eli Marmor wrote:
3. Ability to change any directive, from anywhere in Apache, on-the-
fly.
This 'feature' would make doing on-the-fly virtual hosting much much
easier.
So, what is the next step?
Anyone making up some plans?
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Neil Gunton wrote:
The problem now is that the browsers (IE and Mozilla at least) don't
seem to differentiate requests based on cookies. I have tested
requesting a page with a certain cookie (where the page has a sufficient
expiration to warrant being cached for the duration of the test), and
* Apache config *
ERROR:
Bad syntax or unknown instruction.
SOLUTION:
This is the Minimalist Mailing List Manager.
Commands may be either in subject of message (one command per message)
or in body (one or more commands, one per line). Batched processing starts
when subject either
* mod_proxy distinguish cookies? *
ERROR:
Bad syntax or unknown instruction.
SOLUTION:
This is the Minimalist Mailing List Manager.
Commands may be either in subject of message (one command per message)
or in body (one or more commands, one per line). Batched processing starts
when
