On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Heh, it's so much easier when you have a reproducable case to work on.
Believe me, I know; I ask my clients for reproducible cases all the
time. I'm starting to learn some tricks for tracking down problems like
this one. Hopefully my
On 26 Aug 2004 13:03:06 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2004/08/26 06:03:06
Modified:.CHANGES
Log:
Synch with 2.0 branch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1568+9 -1 httpd-2.0/CHANGES
Index: CHANGES
On 26 Aug 2004 15:24:51 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/08/26 08:24:51
Modified:modules/ldap util_ldap.c
Log:
Preserve the return value from the apr_stat() call so that it can be displayed in
the error log message.
{
Hi,
I'm going to start a TR cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:08 PM +0200 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to start a TR cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Vote early and often for APR 1.0 so that 2.1 can use an official 1.0 release
of APR. ;-) -- justin
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to start a TR cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
Got a few 2.0 backports from 2.1 I need to drum up support for but otherwise +1
Bill
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Should the type for refcount be apr_atomic_t instead of apr_uint32_t?
It does not build currently for NetWare.
JJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/26/04 10:59 AM
stoddard2004/08/26 09:59:46
Index: mod_cache.h
On 26 Aug 2004 18:04:20 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-*) Allocate buffer memory from the temp_pool rather than the stack to
- avoid over-running a fixed length stack while evaluating nested
- include directives.
- server/config.c: r1.180
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering
close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be
interesting to try the same thing for worker with
a dedicated closer thread.
The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling
characteristics without
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering
close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be
interesting to try the same thing for worker with
a dedicated closer thread.
The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I almost wonder if a large number of requests are actually failing in
the patched case under high load...
Me too, but there are no failed requests reported by ab:
/usr/local/apache2/bin/ab -n 1 -c 1000 http://localhost/
This is ApacheBench,
Same here. I need another vote for the util_ldap.c backport
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:21:22 AM
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to
* Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I have no time to spend on it. From a quick look at the code, it
seems that it is possible for the errfn to log header fields which is why I
choose to escape the string.
Sure...
Why wouldn't you want to escape the string just
to be safe? The
13 matches
Mail list logo
