On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:09:20AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 05:05 PM 9/12/2004, you wrote:
-AP_DECLARE(long) ap_get_client_block(request_rec *r, char *buffer, apr_size_t
bufsiz);
+AP_DECLARE(apr_ssize_t) ap_get_client_block(request_rec *r, char *buffer,
apr_size_t bufsiz);
Why do we merge multiple Host headers? I am getting wierd things like
this for headers_in host: www.cnn.com, www.cnn.com
This may be correct, but it caught me by surprise!
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Operations
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 03:56:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- STATUS 13 Sep 2004 15:39:57 - 1.751.2.1044
+++ STATUS 13 Sep 2004 15:56:19 - 1.751.2.1045
@@ -75,16 +75,17 @@
*) mod_dav_fs: Fix indirect lock record handling on 64-bit platforms.
--On Monday, September 13, 2004 5:13 PM +0100 Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On platforms with sizeof(int) == sizeof(apr_size_t), the change is a
noop, so no break there.
On other platforms, any indirect lock records which have already been
written to the database by the =2.0.50 code will be
A couple months the IfModule block was modified so that it can use
foo_module instead of the Source File name (ie foo.c).
I believe that using the ${name}_module syntax is clearer than using the
source file name. I would like to encourage using this newer syntax in
the 2.2 Stable Cycle.
Hello,
We are in the migration stage from apache proxy 1.3.27 to 2.0.48. We are
using this software as proxy server not web server. We have identified
several issues with caching functionality in 2.0.48, however 1.3.27 is
caching the content served by web servers properly. Is there a fix already
Nayak, Narayana wrote:
We are in the migration stage from apache proxy 1.3.27 to 2.0.48. We are
using this software as proxy server not web server. We have identified
several issues with caching functionality in 2.0.48, however 1.3.27 is
caching the content served by web servers properly. Is there
Why do we merge multiple Host headers? I am getting wierd things like
this for headers_in host: www.cnn.com, www.cnn.com
This may be correct, but it caught me by surprise!
Well, it is an invalid HTTP request. The question is, should be
fix it for the client by choosing either the first or last
* Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we merge multiple Host headers? I am getting wierd things like
this for headers_in host: www.cnn.com, www.cnn.com
This may be correct, but it caught me by surprise!
Well, it is an invalid HTTP request. The question is, should be
fix
This one is working as expected on my server. I tested most
of the paths and it looks fine. Added comments to the previous
path. Will like some double-checking and feedback if possible.
The race condition is fixed, no performance hit like with
the mutex patch, and no memory leak, from what I
Dear all,
I am conducting a survey on open source software. This is for my academic
coursework and dissertation. It will be great to have your support and
participation in this survey.
This survey has two separate questionnaires, focusing on the following
areas:
1) OSS development (Developers
Hello,
Could you remove httpd-2.0/build/config.{sub,guess} from CVS and add
them to the httpd-2.0/build/.cvsignore list on APACHE_2_0_BRANCH?
These files are presented in APACHE_2_0_BRANCH [1] but they are copied
by buildconf [2] from the src tree of apr to the build directory.
So, they show
12 matches
Mail list logo
