On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:54:41 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
On 2005/08/13 00:42, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I wasn't really aware that there _were_ that many ways to use
libapreq2. If there are useful ones which for some reason aren't
supported by my packaging, I'd be
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:34:50PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Here's a more involved patch that gets the logic right. It's 6pm on a
Friday for me, so I have only tested it a little, but thought I'd
share
for comment before the weekend.
+1 on inspection... testing to be done over
the
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need to prepare a status report for the HTTP server project
for the ASF board meeting on Wednesday (IIRC). Given that
I'll be on vacation for two weeks starting Monday, it would
be nice to have some text ready to send in by Sunday night.
Our last
On 8/10/05, steve roussey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell, Apache 1.3 still assumes that SO_LINGER is
broken on all OSes. Is SO_LINGER still broken on all OSes?
I don't recall a discussion of that here in the last 5 years.
What does
Apache2 do with SO_LINGER?
Apache 2 handles
Cool. I'd split dnsbl_zones into ipv4_dnsbl_zones and ipv6_dnsbl_zones
and have the DnsblZones directive work like;
DnsblIPv4Zones
DnsblIPv6Zones
or similar. IPv6 RBL's do exist, and are incompatible with IPv4 ones, so
it's worth having the support early-on.
I haven't found
Greetings All,
Some kind soul needs to update the NetWare build files for AP2.1 proxy
modules, to include the recently added 'proxy_hook_load_lbmethods()'.
Presently getting the following error:
Linking Release.o/proxybalancer.nlm
### mwldnlm Linker Error:
# Undefined symbol:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:20:10PM -0700, Jem Berkes wrote:
I haven't found any examples of IPv6 RBLs.
rbl-plus.hea.net. If you can give me a small fixed IP range, I can
arrange access.
--
Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure, we could support them but if they are the only one (and without
public documentation on how to use) then aren't we making guesses from a
rare case? I haven't found any public discussion on IPv6 DNSBL
conventions.
For example, what is the standard for how to place the IPv6 string under
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:54:25PM -0700, Jem Berkes wrote:
Sure, we could support them but if they are the only one (and without
public documentation on how to use) then aren't we making guesses from a
rare case? I haven't found any public discussion on IPv6 DNSBL
conventions.
Apart from
Following up on mod_dnsbl, a new version is nearing completion although I
have encountered some obstacles that slowed me down. I have taken some of
Colm's advice to make mod_dnsbl_lookup more flexible and self sufficient.
I'm attaching the documentation part of what I'm currently working on. If
10 matches
Mail list logo
