Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC4

2006-07-25 Thread Steve Hay
Randy Kobes wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files left over that are causing the problem, does it help if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the call to apr_file_mktemp on about line 832 of library/util.c to

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC4

2006-07-25 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote: Yes, that works for me! I tried the individual test and the whole test suite dozens of times over and didn't get a single failure. I'm not sure how it makes any difference, though, or exactly what it does. I searched the whole of my httpd-2.2.2 folder

Re: 401 response with reject ip?

2006-07-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Ruediger Pluem wrote: Having added the following to my virtual host location / reject ip 127.0.0.1 /location results in a 401 response and the following entries in the error_log [Mon Jul 24 16:56:03 2006] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] user (null): authorization failure for /: [Mon

Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3

2006-07-25 Thread Steffen
Please advise which APR, APR-UTIL to build against. Steffen http://www.apachelounge.com - Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 20:33 Subject: Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3 Jorge Schrauwen

Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3

2006-07-25 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I used the apr from trunk like the buildscript on mac sugested.I'll use trunk again tonight on the windows machineOn 7/25/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Please advise which APR, APR-UTIL to build against. Steffenhttp://www.apachelounge.com- Original Message -From: William A. Rowe,

Re: svn commit: r424674 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2006-07-25 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/23/2006 09:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: While we are at it. There is another related report (39243, http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243). Some people feel unhappy with

Re: svn commit: r424674 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2006-07-25 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 25.07.2006 13:22, Joe Orton wrote: On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: I don't know. Ask Joe :-) A config directive is the last resort of the indecisive... but I guess it's going to have to happen in this case. It would be similar in spirit to

Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3

2006-07-25 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 25.07.2006 13:00, Steffen wrote: Please advise which APR, APR-UTIL to build against. Either use trunk or the latest 1.2.x release (thats what I do). Regards RĂ¼diger

Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3

2006-07-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I used the apr from trunk like the buildscript on mac sugested. I'll use trunk again tonight on the windows machine FYI any 1.2.x release or later 1.x release should be fine. 1.2.{latest} is baseline and likely to be what we ship with for a while. Bill

Re: svn commit: r425454 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/NWGNUproxyajp modules/proxy/ajp_utils.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c modules

2006-07-25 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 07/25/2006 06:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mturk Date: Tue Jul 25 09:50:07 2006 New Revision: 425454 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425454view=rev Log: Added cping/cpong support for the AJP protocol. Added: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/ajp_utils.c

2.2.x Trunk Test

2006-07-25 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I've tested this on the following platforms:Note: Using APR-Trunk trow a lot of unresolved link errors and doesn't compile.Using APR 1.2.7, APR-util 1.2.7 and APR iconv 1.1.1 work fine.OS: Mac OS X 10.4 IntelMacCompilter: GCC4Modules: Default OptionsResult: Compiled fineBasic Auth worked fine, so

Re: svn commit: r425454 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/NWGNUproxyajp modules/proxy/ajp_utils.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c modules

2006-07-25 Thread Mladen Turk
Ruediger Pluem wrote: It does not build properly on Linux (guess this is true for all systems except Windows and Netware). I am not a build system expert, but I guess config.m4 in the proxy directory needs to be adjusted to get ajp_utils.c compiled and linked. Right. I missed to commit

Re: svn commit: r425454 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/NWGNUproxyajp modules/proxy/ajp_utils.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c modules

2006-07-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: ajp_utils.c is in Dos EOL style format. Mladen, please don't trash httpd in the style of tomcat svn. Text is text. Teach your svn utilities that :)

Re: 401 response with reject ip?

2006-07-25 Thread Brad Nicholes
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 9:02 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having added the following to my virtual host location / reject ip 127.0.0.1 /location results in a 401 response and the following entries in the error_log [Mon Jul 24 16:56:03

Re: svn commit: r425454 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/NWGNUproxyajp modules/proxy/ajp_utils.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c modules

2006-07-25 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: ajp_utils.c is in Dos EOL style format. Mladen, please don't trash httpd in the style of tomcat svn. Text is text. Teach your svn utilities that :) It needs eol-style set up. It's a new file.

Re: svn commit: r425561 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2006-07-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
* mod_isapi: Simply backport the host of fixes for compilation on unix, PR#'s 15993 29098 30022 16637 30033 28089 by pushing to trunk/ rev 416293 of modules/arch/win32/mod_isapi.[ch] which compiles without changes. Source + Binary posted at

Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3

2006-07-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: All of this sounds great! But I'm planning to TR by Wednesday, it's just been way too long since we've had a release. Pathetic really :) Just to make sure 2.2.3 and 2.0.59 are rock solid, I'll slide this to Thursday morning. Please get your backports committed