Hi,
I have a module that uses ap_internal_redirect. Everything but one thing
works as expected. The request is correctly redirected but accessing the
request url from a cgi
still gives the old url. I wonder why this isn't changed on the internal
redirect (am i overseeing something here?) .. do i
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:25:40PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/22/2008 10:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_scache.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_scache.c Fri Feb 22 13:09:40 2008
@@ -40,6 +40,20 @@
void
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:40:26AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/22/2008 08:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Fri Feb 22 11:58:39 2008
New Revision: 630307
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630307view=rev
...
memcpy(expiry, dbmval.dptr, sizeof(time_t));
+
On Feb 22, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/22/2008 07:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] since the code in question is in APR.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:45:53PM +0100, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
wrote:
On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:27 AM,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Niklas Edmundsson
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 18:11
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: APR Developer List
Betreff: Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
It seems to work after fixing the
On 02/25/2008 11:59 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:25:40PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/22/2008 10:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_scache.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_scache.c Fri Feb 22 13:09:40 2008
@@ -40,6
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:51:23PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 11:59 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Ah, no, that's not quite the intent. The intent of the code is only to
ignore the first post_config run during startup. It's necessary and
correct for this code to initialize the cache
On 02/25/2008 09:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Feb 25 12:09:38 2008
New Revision: 630974
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630974view=rev
Log:
Session cache interface redesign, Part 4:
Move provider-specific configuration handling down into the provider
code.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 09:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Feb 25 12:09:38 2008
New Revision: 630974
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630974view=rev
Log:
Session cache interface redesign, Part 4:
...
---
The session cache interface in mod_ssl on the trunk is now mostly SSL-
and mod_ssl-agnostic with respect to the data storage and configuration.
There is still some tight coupling between the session cache and the
ssl_mutex interface, but that's next on my hit list.
Is there any interest in
On 02/25/2008 10:45 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 09:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Feb 25 12:09:38 2008
New Revision: 630974
-if (mc-szSessionCacheDataFile == NULL) {
-
On 02/25/2008 11:12 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
The session cache interface in mod_ssl on the trunk is now mostly SSL-
and mod_ssl-agnostic with respect to the data storage and configuration.
There is still some tight coupling between the session cache and the
ssl_mutex interface, but that's next
On 02/25/2008 11:22 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 10:45 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 09:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Feb 25 12:09:38 2008
New Revision: 630974
-if
Joe Orton wrote:
The session cache interface in mod_ssl on the trunk is now mostly SSL-
and mod_ssl-agnostic with respect to the data storage and configuration.
There is still some tight coupling between the session cache and the
ssl_mutex interface, but that's next on my hit list.
Is there
On 02/25/2008 11:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 11:22 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 10:45 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/25/2008 09:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Feb 25 12:09:38
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The session cache interface in mod_ssl on the trunk is now mostly SSL-
and mod_ssl-agnostic with respect to the data storage and configuration.
There is still some tight coupling between the session cache and the
ssl_mutex
Joe Orton wrote:
The session cache interface in mod_ssl on the trunk is now mostly SSL-
and mod_ssl-agnostic with respect to the data storage and configuration.
There is still some tight coupling between the session cache and the
ssl_mutex interface, but that's next on my hit list.
Is there
17 matches
Mail list logo
