On 04-05-2012 21:04, Igor Galić wrote:
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
This may be worth a separate thread, but I'll just ask
it here, before I forget about it:
Any chance we'll see a backport of this to /current/ ?
If so, will we display the same comments as
On Friday 04 May 2012, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
there are some parts of httpd where unit tests would allow easier
testing or more complete test coverage than tests written for the
perl
framework. Examples include the ap_pcfg_* functions, the varbuf
API,
Of course it would also be a possibility that we simply mark the
functions to be tested as non-static. Personally, I think that is
ugly, though.
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course it would also be a possibility that we simply mark the
functions to be tested as non-static. Personally, I think that is
ugly, though.
Sorry, sent draft instead of discarding.
Could they have some AP_XXX macro
- Original Message -
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
wrote:
Of course it would also be a possibility that we simply mark the
functions to be tested as non-static. Personally, I think that is
ugly, though.
Sorry, sent draft instead of discarding.
Over on docs@ one of the recent conversations was
around moving the site documentation to the CMS,
starting first with the httpd site as a testbed.
After several hours of hacking on the site that
has now been accomplished, so we'd please like everyone
to review and comment on the httpd staging
