On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate deliberate abuse of open standards
I've come around on this one over time.
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.23 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.23 of the Apache HTTP
Server (Apache). This version of Apache is principally a security
and bug fix maintenance release,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate
Any proxy/bb gurus have some cycles to look at the patch attached to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
On 09/13/2012 03:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate
I'll take a look...
On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Any proxy/bb gurus have some cycles to look at the patch attached to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Just on inspection, these seems to *really* gobble up memory.
And the patch touches a LOT of core code, in both httpd and apr,
so that's making me wary.
But let me look deeper into the actual traces.
On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'll take a look...
On
I think we are all in agreement, however, that MS is
violating the standard... are we not?
With that as a given, do we Do Nothing? I don't think so;
We shouldn't, by action or inaction, permit violations. Now,
with that as a given, the question is How Do We Respond.
At the very least, the commit
On Sep 6, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Zisis Lianas zisis.lia...@consol.de wrote:
Tom, thanks for your feedback.
The main difference between our configurations is that you do
ProxyPassReverse the single BalancerMember (http://app05/...),
which is also working for me - in my configuration I
On Sep 13, 2012 7:48 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I think we are all in agreement, however, that MS is
violating the standard... are we not?
With that as a given, do we Do Nothing? I don't think so;
We shouldn't, by action or inaction, permit violations. Now,
with that
On 13 Sep 2012, at 18:24, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it is a transparency issue so much as a poor choice of
venues for airing the disagreement. We've put something in the .conf
file that many administrators will need to remove and almost none will
have a need to
On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I think we are all in agreement, however, that MS is
violating the standard... are we not?
With that as a given, do we Do Nothing? I don't think so;
With this configuration I get a 500 error because of
[proxy_balancer:trace1] ... mod_proxy_balancer.c(73): ... canonicalising
URL //defaultclusterjsp, when trying to access /clusterjsp:
ProxyPass / balancer://default
ProxyPassReverse / balancer://default
Maybe this also expected.
But:
With
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Tim Bannister is...@jellybaby.net wrote:
On 13 Sep 2012, at 18:24, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it is a transparency issue so much as a poor choice of
venues for airing the disagreement. We've put something in the .conf
file that many
On Sep 13, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Zisis Lianas zisis.lia...@consol.de wrote:
With this configuration I get a 500 error because of
[proxy_balancer:trace1] ... mod_proxy_balancer.c(73): ... canonicalising
URL //defaultclusterjsp, when trying to access /clusterjsp:
ProxyPass / balancer://default
On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:48 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate deliberate abuse of open
just my two cents: but would not ${localstatedir} perhaps followed by
hostname (or even (vhost) ServerName for virtual hosts be a nice default
path (and of course give a configureable widgit for anyone who does not
want to use a default.
Things that used to go to /tmp could go to something like
Hi. I downloaded the new 2.2.X branch and ran buildconf. It suggested I get
apr and apr-util using svn and I was a bit surprised when it suggested
.../branches/1.3.x for apr-util
Are there compatibility issues I am not aware of as I had always been using
the 1.4.x apr-util before.
Just checking.
20 matches
Mail list logo
