On 01/21/2013 07:32 AM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thank you for your comment.
I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test
it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In
particular, you have a lot of declarations after statements in your
code,
hi!
Has anyone tried to build 2.4.3 with vc11?
Using either makefiles or dsp (converted), I got a rc.exe error,
invalid usage. The cmd line is:
rc.exe /d NDEBUG /d APP_FILE /d BIN_NAME=httpd.exe /d
LONG_NAME=Apache HTTP Server /d ICON_FILE=apache.ico /d
_VC80_UPGRADE=0x0600 /l 0x409 /I
On 2013/01/21, at 19:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 07:32 AM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thank you for your comment.
I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test
it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In
particular,
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are:
- test case 1 mod_mruby inline code into https.conf
mod_mruby need not fopen()
- test case 2 run mod_mruby scripts file per requests
mod_mruby need fopen() and fclose() per requests
- test environment
OS: Linux version
On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are: snip
My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)?
Most people will be using 2.4 with the event MPM, which is threaded, not
the prefork MPM. I have no problems doing
On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are: snip
My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)?
Most people will be using 2.4 with the event MPM, which
On Jan 20, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Fabien wrote:
Hello devs,
I've been given the go to add mod_macro to httpd trunk, see r1435811.
The module is in modules/core. There are English and French documentations
and extensive non regression tests. The module is compiled in with most. It
is
On Jan 20, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
On 1/17/2013 6:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
*ping* :)
(yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer
stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13)
BalancerPersist:
Tested fine and works as expected (+1)
Side
On 1/21/2013 8:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the
Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between
a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On,
if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A
and B get their own
On 1/21/2013 8:59 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
druggeri: (Discussion started on dev@ list)
* This can not be fully verified until bug 52402 is fixed
+ jim: 52402 is fixed and is part of the backport for
persist below
* This doesn't seem to
On 1/21/2013 12:27 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Argh - saw this after the dev@ reply. Will mess with both patches
together and report back. For now ignore my previous message :-)
Aye - that did it! Sorry for the noise - was testing the two patches
independently.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 2013/01/21, at 22:17, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are: snip
My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even
On 21.01.2013 15:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the
Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between
a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On,
if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A
and B get their own
No worries! Thx for the review!
On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
On 1/21/2013 12:27 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Argh - saw this after the dev@ reply. Will mess with both patches
together and report back. For now ignore my previous message :-)
Aye - that
14 matches
Mail list logo
