Hi,
to reproduce it, I start httpd-2.4.4 like this:
/usr/sbin/httpd -k start -DFOREGROUND
and in another terminal I run ab like this:
ab -n 15 -c 4 http://127.0.0.1/index.php
Index.php is just dummy script with phpinfo.
When ab is benchmarking, I kill httpd using ctrl+c. In 4/10 tries
However, looking at your patch, having to lock the mutex for
ap_proxy_get_worker() looks wrong. I think it should be passed r-pool
instead of conf-pool.
I checked how ap_proxy_get_worker() is used in other places and also what
is done with the pool inside and you are right. It really shouldn't
Attached patch contains a directive to improve the error marking of
workers. Basically, some errors will cause a worker to be marked as in
error while others don't. I can't see a reason for this so I added a
directive to have all errors mark the error correctly - especially useful
for automated
Hi all,
I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
late to get something like this done, I am now contemplating adding a
link
+1.
PS: The ap_proxy_define_balancer() stuff is there for future enhancements
(creating balancers on the fly, instead of just workers).
On May 7, 2013, at 4:07 AM, Thomas Eckert thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
However, looking at your patch, having to lock the mutex for
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Thomas Eckert
thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch contains a directive to improve the error marking of workers.
Basically, some errors will cause a worker to be marked as in error while
others don't. I can't see a reason for this so I added a
Links don't imply endorsement (although maybe we need to say that explicitly),
so I think that links are a very good thing when they help real people solve
real problems.
So, +1
On May 7, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi all,
I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I
On 5/7/2013 3:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi all,
I did some talking with Jim and Rich (or was it Rainer, I forget) during
ApacheCon, in which we agreed that we need to plug our modules directory
some more. I totally forgot all about this, but since it's never too
late to get something like this
Agreed... An all or nothing setting will likely create more
trouble than not.
On May 7, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Thomas Eckert
thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch contains a directive to improve the error marking of
On 5/7/2013 2:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Agreed... An all or nothing setting will likely create more
trouble than not.
On May 7, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Thomas Eckert
thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch contains
10 matches
Mail list logo
