On 28.06.2013 23:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
TIA!
it seems a bit odd to me that we now roll the 2.0.65 final without
having APR/APU picking up latest fixes [1][2], making
On 28.06.2013 23:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2)
+1 on NetWare.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1, tested on AIX 5.3 / xlc / PPC32 and AIX 7.1 / xlc / PPC64
AIX 5.3: Only failures in recently updated include.t timezone stuff
AIX 7.1: 100% success
--
Eric
On 6/28/2013 2:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2)
VC9 x64 Server 2003 R2 x64
VC9 x86 Vista x86
All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler
mechanism to allow content type - handler mappings. If no r-handler
has been set, but a content-type has, the content-type is copied to
r-handler.
Is there a use case for this? It makes it hard for handlers to check
if someone else has
The directory handling still relies on this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler
mechanism to allow content type - handler mappings. If no r-handler
has been set, but a
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The directory handling still relies on this.
Other *_MAGIC_TYPES do too, but I'm guessing they could be boiled down
to just r-handler.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
TIA!
[+1] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
Tested 64-bit builds on FreeBSD 9
