Re: mod_proxy_http2 windows build

2016-05-18 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 18 May 2016 14:54:41 -0500): >The .dsp files become irrelevant in this day and age, the legacy environment >it maps to is entirely dead and beyond availability (snip)... Yet they are still the preferred way of building Apache by the people at

Re: mod_proxy_http2 windows build

2016-05-18 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Michal Karm wrote: > On 05/18/2016 05:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> ... and .mak/.dep files in 2.4 branch, I'm on it today. >> >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Stefan Eissing < >> stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de

Task #85e57cec: Improve the Request Processing guide

2016-05-18 Thread Onder SEZGIN
Hi, I would like to contribute to the task. Any guidance how i can do that is appreciated. Cheers

Re: mod_proxy_http2 windows build

2016-05-18 Thread Stefan Eissing
it should be in cmakelist in the apache svn. > Am 18.05.2016 um 17:58 schrieb Michal Karm : > >> On 05/18/2016 05:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> ... and .mak/.dep files in 2.4 branch, I'm on it today. >> >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Stefan Eissing >>

Re: mod_proxy_http2 windows build

2016-05-18 Thread Michal Karm
On 05/18/2016 05:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: ... and .mak/.dep files in 2.4 branch, I'm on it today. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: Reaching out to the knowledgable and always helpful

Re: mod_proxy_http2 windows build

2016-05-18 Thread William A Rowe Jr
... and .mak/.dep files in 2.4 branch, I'm on it today. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Stefan Eissing < stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > Reaching out to the knowledgable and always helpful Windows people: do we > need a mod_proxy_http2.dsp in trunk/modules/http2 (and 2.4.x branch for >

mod_proxy_http2 windows build

2016-05-18 Thread Stefan Eissing
Reaching out to the knowledgable and always helpful Windows people: do we need a mod_proxy_http2.dsp in trunk/modules/http2 (and 2.4.x branch for next release)? -Stefan

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

2016-05-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
Seems like adding that directly to the module itself makes the most sense. Later versions will allow for using Provider API to make it easier to add various checks, On 2016-05-17 05:17, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Jim, > > how do you see the possibility of other

Improving logs to make AUTH_DENIES easy to understand and fix

2016-05-18 Thread Tianyin Xu
Hi all, I've been using httpd's authentication & authorization modules for several weeks. Compared to many other modules I used in the past, the debugging of "auth deny" issues (caused by these modules) is really a pain in the ass. The key problem is that httpd often does not tell *why* certain