Re: mod_brotli in 2.4.x is missing a few Makefile changes

2017-04-29 Thread Gregg Smith
On 4/29/2017 5:19 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Bill, viewing the complete thread your reasoning here should have precluded this discussion years ago when pcre went to cmake, so at or before 2.4.0. After all, it's the only way to build pcre which is a hard requirement, not soft like brotli. I

Re: mod_brotli in 2.4.x is missing a few Makefile changes

2017-04-29 Thread Gregg Smith
On 4/28/2017 9:35 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:30:03 -0500): You might have missed my thought here... suggesting that the CMake not-so-experimental build become recommended for users who want to build all the modules in one go

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

2017-04-29 Thread Gregg Smith
Yes, and only with the legacy build and then only with the IDE. Those files are static. If you build at the command line it should "just work." When I built with apr 1.5 however apr_crypto_openssl would not build with openssl 1.1.0. I cannot see how that has changed.. On 4/29/2017 1:42 AM,

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

2017-04-29 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Apr 29, 2017 12:16 PM, "Gregg Smith" wrote: Once APR 1.6 is released my plan is to make the change permanent next 2.4.x then making the need for that conversion unneeded. Openssl 1.0.2 is good till sometime in 2019, even 1.1.0 eol's before it does so we're stuck w/ cvtdsp.pl

Re: svn commit: r1792912 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/filters: mod_brotli.dsp mod_brotli.mak

2017-04-29 Thread Gregg Smith
No, libs/exe still land in the source root. On 4/28/2017 8:35 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Wouldn't there be a corresponding change to LIBPATH? On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:17 AM, wrote: Author: gsmith Date: Thu Apr 27 15:17:57 2017 New Revision: 1792912 URL:

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

2017-04-29 Thread Gregg Smith
APR 1.6 is needed for apr_crypto_openssl, obviously. ABS: Not sure. When I originally tried building w/ APR 1.5 it didn't work, but it didn't work with OpenSSL 1.1 and APR 1.6 either. That has now been fixed by Rainer. Have not tried 1.5/1.1.0 w/ abs yet so I simply don't know. Feel free to

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

2017-04-29 Thread Steffen
Also no issue with apr_crypto_openssl and mod_session crypto ? Begin Message Group: gmane.comp.apache.devel MsgID: Is this a Windows issue? I built with 1.1.0e on MacOS and apr 1.5 and saw no problems. >Am

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

2017-04-29 Thread Stefan Eissing
Is this a Windows issue? I built with 1.1.0e on MacOS and apr 1.5 and saw no problems. > Am 28.04.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Steffen : > > I doubt now. It was based on a note in cvtdsp.pl. > > Maybe it is only a .dsp and xml change, which I can apply to 1.5. > > Maybe