As recently disclosed in;
https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html#CVE-2016-4975
Sergey Bobrov brought this disclosure of a moderate vulnerability in
mod_userdir to the httpd project security@ team. Given various examples of
invalid and valid request URL's, even the valid input
Hi, Bill;
I would be game for tagging and rolling 2.4.35 and 2.4.36 shortly
after. I can volunteer to do both... in fact, with the scripts in place
(but needing some minor cleanup, I think), I'm generally willing to T
on-demand barring personal things that would keep me from doing so.
--
I'm unaware of anything blocking a tag today, if someone wants to proceed.
What is gained by waiting a few days to slip in another rushed patch to
break yet another release?
I see nothing in STATUS necessary to fix 2.4 regressions, but many proposed
behavioral changes which suggest the likelyhood
On 9/12/2018 1:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What improvements do you have to suggest to improve upon this? Do you recommend a longer vote time?
Do you recommend beta and/or release-candidates? Do you recommend that the 1st born of all voters
be held in a camp until the release has "proven"
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 12:24
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:55 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
> >
> > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > > Von: Yann
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:59 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> > Forking from the Cool Stuff thread.
> >
> > Have you noticed that the wstunnell stuff makes the suspended count in
> > the MPM grow? There is no API for us to tell the MPM that when
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:55 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Yann Ylavic
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 10:37
> > An: httpd-dev
> > Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM Plüm, Rüdiger,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 10:37
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
> >
> > I don't like the "misuse" of c->aborted here. I for
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> I don't like the "misuse" of c->aborted here. I for instance log in
> the access log whether connections have been aborted or not and this
> approach would mean that all proxied websocket connections would get
> marked as
Great work, Joe!
> Am 12.09.2018 um 18:35 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> How much have your testings now proceeded? Yann reported interop with
>> firefox for him against trunk. Did you manage to track down your
>> problems? Something
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Eric Covener
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 02:34
> An: Apache HTTP Server Development List
> Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 01:59
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> > Forking from the Cool Stuff thread.
> >
> > Have you noticed that the
12 matches
Mail list logo
