On 18/06/2019 19:29, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just for the records, this is apparently already pat of r1809037 on trunk.
Coorect should I ask for a back port?
>
> CJ
>
> Le 18/06/2019 à 14:52, jean-frederic clere a écrit :
>> On 18/06/2019 14:38, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>> I always
Hi,
Just for the records, this is apparently already pat of r1809037 on trunk.
CJ
Le 18/06/2019 à 14:52, jean-frederic clere a écrit :
On 18/06/2019 14:38, Stefan Eissing wrote:
I always run in maintainer mode, but on MacOS. gcc is often more picky. Is that
what you use?
Yes gcc looks
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:34 AM William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Looking at this feature, and the new allowance effective June 2014,
> is this something we would want to toggle by envvar (in addition to
> or in lieu of a directive) similar to various gzip, caching, downgrade
> and
Hi Eric,
Looking at this feature, and the new allowance effective June 2014,
is this something we would want to toggle by envvar (in addition to
or in lieu of a directive) similar to various gzip, caching, downgrade
and particularly the redirect-carefully overrides? This seems like
the sort of
On 18/06/2019 14:38, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> I always run in maintainer mode, but on MacOS. gcc is often more picky. Is
> that what you use?
Yes gcc looks quite clever now ;-) see the patch attached.
BTW: that is the only one in 2.4.x now my branch wasn't up to date...
>
>> Am 18.06.2019 um
I always run in maintainer mode, but on MacOS. gcc is often more picky. Is that
what you use?
> Am 18.06.2019 um 14:33 schrieb jean-frederic clere :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have spotted a bunch of errors when using ./configure
> --enable-maintainer-mode on the branch 2.4.x, do we plan to fix those?
>
>
Hi,
I have spotted a bunch of errors when using ./configure
--enable-maintainer-mode on the branch 2.4.x, do we plan to fix those?
Some are really errors (probably core with bad httpd,conf) some are more
tricky...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
> In the old code path we did not set the Location header and did not append
> the args if
> apr_is_url fails. So shouldn't we do a
Thanks, r1861569
