Since OpenSSL 3.0.0 GA came out yesterday (Californuts time) I think it
would be nice to have r1891138 backported for those wishing to try it
out. What you say?
Cheers,
Gregg
On 8/1/2020 7:13 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
[ ] +1:
Hi Steffen,
Assuming your building in the IDE as I know to be your usual;
On 5/8/2020 4:59 AM, Steffen wrote:
Tried revision 1877505.
libhttpd :
miss in trunk modules\http\http_etag.c. Moved the one from Branches to
include, libhttpd builds then, is that ok ?
Yes to get it to build for
On 3/26/2020 7:50 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.43:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's
On 3/23/2020 8:18 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Per the issues surfaced/fixed, I'll go ahead and declare this release
as dead-on-the vine. I'll target another T later this week, hopefully
after the discussion around OpenSSL versioning plays out.
How about Thursday?
+1
On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
[X] +1: It's good enough!
VC14 & 15 x86 & x64 w/ makefiles
Opps, looks like the APLOGNO's didn't get filled in. I'm still ok
Thanks Stefan :)
On 3/14/2019 6:39 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
Author: icing
Date: Thu Mar 14 13:39:21 2019
New Revision: 1855519
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1855519=rev
Log:
Uplift of relevante changes of r1855479 in branches/2.4.x, re disappearance of
h2_ngn_shed.* sources.
When setting a header it used to set the header case-sensitive as
configured. Now with 2.4.38 it sets in all lower case. Regression?
Header always set X-Xss-Protection "1; mode=block"
Result;
2.4.37: X-Xss-Protection: 1; mode=block
2.4.38: x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
If I'm reading the RFC
I objected earlier but am reversing my objection after looking through
applink.c and the explanation of what it does below. Worse case there's
a very small bit of unused code in httpd.exe.
Steffen tried one of my binaries and told me off-list the results so it
seems it is needed, even when
On 10/15/2018 7:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Like my beg for getting us to the 2.4.35 release tag, I'd like to propose
we keep patches to branches/2.4.x/ generally within the scope of
straightening out the remaining quirks related to the OpenSSL 1.1.1 API and
library behavior changes (and
3/2018 11:22 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 12:00 PM Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/13/2018 8:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Sorry, I don't understand.
Gregg, can you shed some insight here? For both, applink.c is helpful if
the OpenSSL .dll files are created with a differ
7, 2018 at 7:05 PM William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
So we kind of left this hanging...
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:35 PM Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/15/2016 9:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
In building httpd.exe, some users don't build and install openssl. It
isn't
going
to be possible to simply #inc
FWIW, I've been running 2.4.36-dev at revision 1841586 for 19 days 35
minutes as of this writing and I've seen no problems up to this point.
Granted I only get a few thousand hits a day and not millions but so far
so good. Haven't had many tls/1.3 but I would assume that's to be
expected for
On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.35:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's
On 9/12/2018 1:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What improvements do you have to suggest to improve upon this? Do you recommend a longer vote time?
Do you recommend beta and/or release-candidates? Do you recommend that the 1st born of all voters
be held in a camp until the release has "proven"
if
not many.
On 6/2/2018 10:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Then let's put every modules/* directory /I into the list now across all
.mak/.dsp and cmakelists, just as the Unix build does? Then this should not
come up again until a new modules/Foo tree arrives?
WDYT?
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, 12:01 Gregg
Hi Christophe,
This compiles and ApacheMonitor works.
Tested on VC14 & 11.
Cheers,
Gregg
On 5/24/2018 1:36 PM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jailletc36
Date: Thu May 24 20:36:26 2018
New Revision: 1832198
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1832198=rev
Log:
Success of
Fashionably late to the party but I've built it on Windows and it works
for me on FF Nightly. Thanks Stefan for getting tls1.3 in and working.
Cheers
On 4/4/2018 4:24 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately, my FF 58.0.2 and 59.0.2 still keeps doing
TLSv1.2
while the
My read on the original post:
First we have stated that "For mod_ssl to work in the vote release,
mod_md must also be included..."
That is what I honed in on. Apache will not start if there's a module
specific directive without that module being loaded. Since the OP states
that *mod_ssl*
On 3/9/2018 6:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.32:
[+1]: So far, so good.
on
nearly every candidate.
Thanks for your efforts and enthusiasm Gregg, I'm not about to start
ignoring your input,
Cheers
Bill
On Feb 25, 2018 14:17, "Gregg Smith" <g...@gknw.net> wrote:
On 2/23/2018 10:24 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:0
On 2/23/2018 10:24 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Steffen wrote:
Op 18 feb. 2018 om 17:57 heeft Eric Covener het volgende
geschreven:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Steffen wrote:
On
Stefan,
Yes, that and vhost.c would.
Gregg
On 1/22/2018 12:29 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Gregg,
that'd mean we need an AP_DECLARE on that in http_vhost.h? Would that suffice?
Cheers, Stefan
Am 20.01.2018 um 03:50 schrieb Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net>:
Hi Stefan,
Sp
Hi Stefan,
Specific to ssl_engine_config.c, on Win32 we need to have
ap_parse_vhost_addrs() exported from vhost.c.
Cheers,
G
On 9/8/2017 3:29 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
Author: icing
Date: Fri Sep 8 10:29:53 2017
New Revision: 1807709
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1807709=rev
Done.
trunk r1821195
2.4.x r1821196
On 1/15/2018 8:53 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg must have a look in the .mak files maybe better he commits (as usual).
Added in libhttpd.dsp :
SOURCE=.\server\config.c
# End Source File
+# Begin Source File
+
+SOURCE=.\server\util_debug.c
+# End Source File
Everything in 2.4 is also in trunk with the exception of the .mak/dep
files AFAIK. BaseAddr.ref will not merge/backport to 2.4 w/o conflict is
all, like CHANGES.
If any module in trunk is not being built then please do share Steffen
on which module/s is/are not being built.
Yann, your
On 1/5/2018 2:25 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Hi Steffen,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Steffen wrote:
What is the one we have to test for next 2.4.30, special mod_md 1.1.8
I have just synchonized the 2.4.x-mod_md branch with 2.4.x (resolving
only a tiny conflict in a
Well I got it now thanks mostly to your instructions Steefen, took
awhile but once I put the the pieces together I see what needs to be done.
On 10/20/2017 1:44 AM, Steffen wrote:
Nope, just double clicking Apache.dsw does now not create the xml
solution. And without xml solution httpd
On 10/19/2017 5:49 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Steffen wrote:
I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building
out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it
should be possible
+1 to doing a 2.4.29 next week with these issues fixed.
On 9/27/2017 9:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The assert() has me concerned, and Steffen's report is problematic. He has
a vote but hasn't cast it. At this moment I'm -0 and would spin a 2.4.29
next week to address these issues, unless
On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.27 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.27 GA.
+1 Windows
On 7/6/2017 12:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Your votes on two decisions, please?
[+1] Release 2.2.34 as legacy GA
[+1] Retire the 2.2.x branch from any further maintenance.
Sorry Bill for the off-list mail now twice but either the list or
thunderbird's behavior with this list has changed. I'll assume the
former since I do not see the reply-to dev@ header anymore.
On 6/24/2017 10:02 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:49 AM,
On 6/13/2017 10:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.26 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.26 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger
Yes it did, thanks for following up.
On 5/22/2017 9:23 AM, Jacob Champion wrote:
On 04/20/2017 01:06 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1750960 $>
Same result with trunk, it just hangs.
Glad it's not just Windows!
Gregg, did Rainer's patch work f
On 4/30/2017 5:36 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
The problem with CMake is that it does not build all things, that AL and
AH put in their distributions. CMake will build Apr 1.6 and Apr-util
1.6, including apr_crypto_openssl-1.dll (1.0.2 or 1.1.0) in one go.
Yes Jan I realize this but "recommend"
On 4/29/2017 5:19 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Bill, viewing the complete thread your reasoning here should have
precluded this discussion years ago when pcre went to cmake, so at or
before 2.4.0. After all, it's the only way to build pcre which is a hard
requirement, not soft like brotli.
I
On 4/28/2017 9:35 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:30:03
-0500):
You might have missed my thought here... suggesting that the CMake
not-so-experimental build become recommended for users who want to
build all the modules in one go
Yes, and only with the legacy build and then only with the IDE. Those
files are static. If you build at the command line it should "just work."
When I built with apr 1.5 however apr_crypto_openssl would not build
with openssl 1.1.0. I cannot see how that has changed..
On 4/29/2017 1:42 AM,
No, libs/exe still land in the source root.
On 4/28/2017 8:35 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Wouldn't there be a corresponding change to LIBPATH?
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:17 AM, wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Thu Apr 27 15:17:57 2017
New Revision: 1792912
URL:
APR 1.6 is needed for apr_crypto_openssl, obviously.
ABS: Not sure. When I originally tried building w/ APR 1.5 it didn't
work, but it didn't work with OpenSSL 1.1 and APR 1.6 either. That has
now been fixed by Rainer. Have not tried 1.5/1.1.0 w/ abs yet so I
simply don't know. Feel free to
On 4/26/2017 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Thanks! Are these the full diffs for Makefile?
On Apr 26, 2017, at 10:50 AM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote:
On 4/26/2017 4:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
On 4/26/2017 4:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that the version of mod_brotli that has been backported to 2.4.x
lacks a few Makefile changes from trunk. This results in a failing Unix
build when
Actually, I'll test here in a while and commit tomorrow.
On 4/25/2017 6:20 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
I have one, command line makefiles and all. I just haven't had time to
run a test build yet though lloking at it looks fine, but I like to test
first.
On 4/25/2017 2:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote
I have one, command line makefiles and all. I just haven't had time to
run a test build yet though lloking at it looks fine, but I like to test
first.
On 4/25/2017 2:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Hi Evgeny,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Evgeny Kotkov
wrote:
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1750960 $>
Same result with trunk, it just hangs.
Glad it's not just Windows!
On 4/20/2017 9:48 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 20.04.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Gregg Smith:
ABS doesn't work with openssl 1.1.0, on windows anyway. It builds
without warni
ABS doesn't work with openssl 1.1.0, on windows anyway. It builds
without warning yet doesn't work.
abs https://www.domain.com
just sits there forever and never completes or shows anything.
I cannot imagine this being a windows only problem.
On 4/20/2017 3:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
We are
On 4/12/2017 9:12 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Wed Apr 12 22:31:15 2017
New Revision: 1791192
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1791192=rev
Log:
Add another include since applink.c has been moved in
the
On 4/11/2017 5:19 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote:
They will say fix ours. Bottom line, it's been moved from
include/openssl/applink.c to ms/applink.c
So, ok, will have to add /ms to the includes or do you have a
On 4/11/2017 3:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:36 AM, wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Tue Apr 11 16:36:25 2017
New Revision: 1790999
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790999=rev
Log:
Retro win32 command-line build
allow building with OpenSSL
On 1/9/2017 10:21 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache legacy httpd 2.2.32
can be found in;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Thanks to all for patches and reviews to get us to this point.
STATUS file is updated to reflect end of maintenance Jul 1 '17.
Hi Norm,
Actually, log2 is not needed. It's cmake that forces it on us.
Look at fast_log.h line 131
#if (defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER <= 1700) || \
(defined(__ANDROID_API__) && __ANDROID_API__ < 18)
/* Visual Studio 2012 and Android API levels < 18 do not have the log2()
* function
On 6/15/2016 9:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
In building httpd.exe, some users don't build and install openssl. It isn't
going
to be possible to simply #include without some
conditional
test. OpenSSL itself is partly the culprit, for not having an
APPLINK_REQUIRED
style macro conditional. But
On 6/14/2016 6:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Gregg, if you would vet the patch as applied to trunk/2.4/2.2, I'd
appreciate it.
On Jun 14, 2016 3:37 PM, wrote:
I built 2.4 and 2.2 in VC14 and tested with VC11 Openssl dlls. Being
down a machine (with all VC runtimes from 9-14
sorry, that was not supposed to go to list.
On 6/14/2016 4:01 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Hi Steffen,
Attached is a svn pull from about 1 hour after I committed my changes.
No need to wait for tag if you would rather get a jump on testing. To
maybe hit the 3 or 4 days after when you find bugs
6 um 22:40 schrieb William A Rowe Jr<wr...@rowe-clan.net>:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Gregg Smith<g...@gknw.net> wrote:
I have the to connect this module in the traditional windows build but as of right now
it's using h2_util.c which Bill had an objection to. See his comments
ht
in
2.4.21 on Windows. If this gets in overnight and you tag in the morning,
I may not be out of bed yet due to the time difference.
That's where my concern is. Make sense?
On 6/13/2016 11:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What needs to be done?
On Jun 13, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Gregg Smith<g...@gknw.
Hi Stefan,
Any plans to backport this before Jim tags 2.4.21 tomorrow?
Thanks,
Gregg
On 5/25/2016 8:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
*) I intend to help maintain/test 2.2.x releases over the next [_6__] mos
*) I intend to backport/review 2.2.x security patches over the next [_0__] mos
On 5/25/2016 11:14 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Your comment doesn't match the code, and I think you have the condition
inverted, _setargv() worked for decades, and only was broken in the more
recent MSVC's.
Typo, should be 1800 in log, I'll change it. I may revert it now that I
dug & found
I got to playing around with trunk over the weekend and ran into this;
.\mod_proxy_hcheck.c(925) : error C2440: 'function' : cannot convert
from 'void *(__cdecl *)(apr_thread_t *,void *)' to 'apr_thread_start_t'
.\mod_proxy_hcheck.c(925) : warning C4022: 'apr_thread_pool_push' :
pointer
On 5/16/2016 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:38 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Are we ready to start the 12 month countdown as of the next/final bug
fix release of 2.2, and highlight this in both the 2.2 and 2.4 announce
broadcasts?
One shortcoming
This one I cannot figure out
.\mod_proxy_hcheck.c(925) : error C2440: 'function' : cannot convert
from 'void *(__cdecl *)(apr_thread_t *,void *)' to 'apr_thread_start_t'
- Gregg -
Oops, one more.
h2_request.c(452) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for
macro 'APLOGNO'
On 4/28/2016 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Ah, will alloc a new one tomorrow. Should be one left. Thanks.
Am 28.04.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Gregg Smith<g...@gknw.net>:
On 4/28/2016 5
On 4/28/2016 5:43 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
Author: icing
Date: Thu Apr 28 12:43:02 2016
New Revision: 1741419
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1741419=rev
Log:
mod_http2: backport of 1.5.2 to 2.4.x
Added:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_bucket_beam.c
- copied,
On 4/4/2016 9:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.20 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.20 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
Hi Stefan,
I've had a real lack of time lately to do much on trunk's mod_http2 on
the windows side. The new mod_proxy_http2 requires a few functions from
mod_http2 and with what time I have had I have been unsuccessful
figuring out how to get these functions exported. So if you (or anyone
Hi Stefan,
It works!
Thanks!
On 2/17/2016 1:04 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi Gregg,
could you check if r1730798 works for you? Thanks!
//Stefan
Am 17.02.2016 um 06:08 schrieb Gregg Smith<g...@gknw.net>:
Hi Stefan,
Windows doesn't seems to like this.
Short call stack and
Hi Stefan,
Windows doesn't seems to like this.
Short call stack and locals in attached.
Regards,
Gregg
httpd-trunk at r1727604
APR 1.5.2
APR-UTIL 1.5.4
PCRE 8.38
SSL 1.0.2f
NGHTTP2 1.7.0
Call Stack
--
> mod_http2.so!h2_slave_create(conn_rec *
On 2/8/2016 9:07 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
PS. I did not update Windows Makefiles. I feel bad.
Don't, I need to play catch-up anyway :)
Should this be in modules/proxy like all the rest of the mod_proxy_*
modules?
I personally do not care, I was just thinking (which in itself can be
+1 Various flavors of VC/Windows
On 12/8/2015 12:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.18 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.18 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[
On 11/3/2015 6:33 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
Author: icing
Date: Tue Nov 3 14:33:11 2015
New Revision: 1712300
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1712300=rev
Log:
rework of output handling on stream/session close, rework of cleartext (http:)
output to pass buckets to core filters,
Hi Jacob,
On 10/9/2015 4:47 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
Stefan,
I'm trying to test mod_http2 for the 2.4.17 release, but I cannot for
the life of me get ALPN and the h2 protocol working together. h2c
seems to work, as does http/1.1 over TLS. My hope is that I'm just
missing a config directive
On 10/9/2015 10:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
Not a vote, I haven't gotten that far yet. It's been
On 10/8/2015 3:57 AM, Steffen wrote:
Jus curious, why is e.g. LUA there ?
Probably because when mod_lua was added it got added and not the case
when mod_proxy_html and mod_xml2enc got added nor did I think about it
when adding mod_h2. My fault.
This is beyond the scope of httpd's source
On 9/25/2015 8:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. September 2015 17:51
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: AW: mod_h2 CTR (Was: Re: svn commit: r1705257 -
http2 is more descriptive for the module's purpose, even if the name is
mod_h2. I like it where it is.
- 0
On 9/22/2015 5:08 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
+0.5
h2 ftw! (but there is also a mod_mime in the http dir, so I do not really feel
strongly about this)
Am 22.09.2015 um 14:05 schrieb
05.09.2015 um 06:12 schrieb Gregg Smith<g...@gknw.net>:
Shouldn't this be ap_array_str_contains now in h2_switch.c?
+while (*protos) {
+/* Add all protocols we know (tls or clear) and that
+ * are part of the offerings (if there have been any).
+ */
-->+if
Shouldn't this be ap_array_str_contains now in h2_switch.c?
+while (*protos) {
+/* Add all protocols we know (tls or clear) and that
+ * are part of the offerings (if there have been any).
+ */
-->+if (!offers || ap_array_contains(offers, *protos)) {
+
On 9/3/2015 9:23 PM, NormW wrote:
On 4/09/2015 9:05 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:52 AM, NormW wrote:
Hi again,
Pushing passed previous problem, now arrive at:
D:\Projects\svn\httpd-trunk\server>svn diff
Index: protocol.c
Hi Norm,
I need it too.
done in r1700917
Gregg
On 9/2/2015 5:07 PM, NormW wrote:
hi,
If not mistaken, on the latest httpd-trunk\modules\http2 update:
D:\Projects\svn\httpd-trunk\modules\http2>svn diff
Index: h2_session.c
===
Hi Stefan,
core patch:
needs r1694950 and may require a minor mmn bump, at least that is what I
took away from the discussion about it over this commit.
h2 patch:
needs r1700917
Thanks,
Gregg
On 9/2/2015 7:10 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
As in r1700829. Regression tests run (after small
On 8/26/2015 6:44 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
I just submitted my first backport STATUS update. Hope I did everything ok,
otherwise please let me know.
For backporting mod_h2 to 2.4.x, I decided to make it in two parts: one is the
patch to core/mod_ssl that introduces Protocols. That is now in
Stefan,
Changes worked great. Thanks.
Gregg
On 8/25/2015 3:43 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Gregg,
I just checked in changes that should fix the warnings you mentioned. Thanks
for reviewing this. As to the SERVER_PROTOCOL, I have no idea yet what may
cause this.
//Stefan
Am 25.08.2015 um
On 8/25/2015 5:57 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Aug 24, 2015 11:43 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
On 8/24/2015 9:29 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
I hope this works for everyone. The next weeks might be a good time to
think about it and propose any changes and correct my mistakes.
There
Hi,
On 8/24/2015 9:29 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
I hope this works for everyone. The next weeks might be a good time to think
about it and propose any changes and correct my mistakes.
There are two things that go bump on my lowest non-eol version of MSVC.
h2_worker.c
.\h2_worker.c(113) :
On 8/10/2015 11:44 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
Hi,
I guess a minor at least.
I did not add, remove or change the structure of the function, I simply
made it available to modules. Does that warrant a major bump?
Never a
Hi,
I guess a minor at least.
I did not add, remove or change the structure of the function, I simply
made it available to modules. Does that warrant a major bump?
On 8/9/2015 10:40 PM, Marion Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi,
doesn't it require a minor ap_mmn.h bump ?
cj
Le 10/08/2015
Argh!
Hi Norm,
Can you attach this patch to the emain, not just paste it into the body
of the message?
I'll assume this is for trunk and 2.4.
Cheers,
Gregg
On 7/24/2015 5:22 PM, NormW wrote:
Hi,
The NetWare Gurus seem to be on holidays. For your consideration:
Index:
On 7/24/2015 5:22 PM, NormW wrote:
Hi,
The NetWare Gurus seem to be on holidays. For your consideration:
Index: modules/cache/NWGNUsocachshmcb
===
--- modules/cache/NWGNUsocachshmcb(revision 1692595)
+++
On 7/15/2015 9:44 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.31, can be found in;
[+1] Release 2.2.31 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
Thanks for the quick turnaround RM!
On 7/14/2015 12:09 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
link.exe -lib @C:\Users\runtime\AppData\Local\Temp\nm9E02.tmp
c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.exe -
nologo -f libaprutil.mak CFG=libaprutil - Win32 Release RECURSE=0
if not exist .\Release/
You know 2.2 has .mak files in the source. They've been given no love in
a long time but nothing major has changed for them to need it AFAIK.
Those should make your automating life simple.
nmake /f makefile.win [options] installr
On 7/14/2015 9:03 AM, Andy Wang wrote:
On 07/14/2015 10:53
On 7/10/2015 1:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
PS: Hopefully, 4th time's the
On 6/26/2015 1:54 AM, Stefan Hett wrote:
On 6/26/2015 4:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/25/2015 10:51 AM, Stefan Hett wrote:
Hi Gregg,
On 6/22/2015 3:58 AM, Stefan Hett wrote:
Hi Gregg,
On 6/22/2015 2:49 AM, Stefan Hett wrote:
Hi,
I just tested building APR 1.5.2 from source on windows
On 6/19/2015 9:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
VC9/12 and various Windows flavors.
On 6/14/2015 2:54 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:29 AM,gsm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Sun Jun 14 09:29:50 2015
New Revision: 1685371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685371
Log:
-1 vote w/ comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified:
On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not since
it
On 6/4/2015 10:01 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
This is new, not quite sure how I didn't see it a few weeks ago as it's 9
weeks old.
Who forgot to fill in the number?
mod_deflate.c(1283) : warning C4003: not enough actual
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo