Glenn wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:37:19PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Oh, how about my (effectively) 2-line patch which adds vhost
to the error log, which I have posted to this list NO LESS THAN 6 TIMES
and spaced out over the past 6 MONTHS in three different formats, using
a global,
Glenn wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:35:20AM +1100, Ian Holsman wrote:
Glenn wrote:
I have some different ideas. One is to distribute APR with 1.3 so
that modules developers could incrementally move their modules to APR.
why can't you just link APR into your 1.3 module? I don't think
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I have always had the feeling that Apache2+prefork was a bit of a
second-class citizen. I have tested it periodically over the past 2 years
and it has never gotten anywhere close to Apache1 in performance. I ran
another test of 1.3.29 vs 2.0.48-prefork just now just to
Brian Akins wrote:
Any thought into parsing the results of the includes filter (offsets,
etc.). In our environment, parsing the includes files is a huge
performance hit.
We are willing to help in any way.
Hey Brian,
it has been discussed before, and the two approaches is what I recall
we
this commit reminds me..
weren't we going to do something similiar to this in 2.1 for the default
file handler? (replace the 'stat' with a 'fstat')
Will .. do you remember the whole details? it was something about
putting the handle into the request_rec or something
Original Message
Commited to the 2.1 branch.
Thanks guys!
Paul Querna wrote:
Based on the Patch by Tyler Riddle for 1.3, these patches add an
IndexStyleSheet for mod_autoindex in 2.0 and 2.1.
The version for 2.1 also handles XHTML.
-Paul Querna
also online:
André Malo wrote:
* Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:18:55 +0100, André Malo wrote
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_autoindex: new directive IndexStyleSheet
Hmm, why not new IndexOption? Isn't that what Indexoptions are for?
You mean somthing like:
IndexOpion
hi.
I was wondering if the queue/hash routines in mod-mem-cache could be
reverted to using the pool based ones, instead of the malloc-based ones.
and possibly change some of the object creation to pool based as well.
this would leave the headers/content as malloc'd
2 reasons I can see for
Cliff Woolley wrote:
Which is exactly what is supposed to happen.
Obviously it's not how things work at the moment, as the memory is never
freed (which could probably be dealt with), but the real problem is that
no data will leave the server out before it was completely read in.
Yes, that
Brian Akins wrote:
This may not be apache-dev related, but I do not know where else to ask it.
Is it possible to save an entire bucket bridade (including it's buckets)
across requests. I looked at ap_save_brigade, but I'm sure that will
work. It seems that the brigades are always tied to a
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
These are comments copied from ap_cache_check_freshness()
line 163 cache_util.c:
--
* - RFC2616 14.9.4 End to end reload, Cache-Control: no-cache.
no-cache in
* either the request or the cached response means that we must
* revalidate
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andre Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:04:09PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project
codebase to the Subversion repository at:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
does mod_php work w/ multithreaded MPMs ?
cu
It can,
but it really depends on what libraries you link in, but yes it does
work if the linked in libraries are thread safe.
--Ian
Graham Leggett wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
The vote is in STATUS, the patch has been shown to work independantly by
one of the testers, could someone please add the last +1 so I can commit
this trivial fix.
Pretty please?
your welcome.
Regards
Ian.
Regards,
Graham
--
ok, now before I start this let me say one thing, this is not for *ALL*
requests, it will only work for ones which don't have content-length
modifiable filters (like gzip) applied to the request, and it would be
left to the webserver admin to figure out what they were, and if you
could use
try raising a bug with PHP or mailing php-internals (which you didn't
seem to crosspost to?)
It looks like configuring with --with-mysql and --with-mysqli is
probably the problem, but I'm not familiar with enough with mysqli
php5 to really comment.
bruce wrote:
hi...
this is cross posted to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 11:44 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are debug messages so not sure why they are a problem.
+0
The logging code is expensive to call for every request like that as
many times as it does. IMHO, there's no benefit to
Brian Akins wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
That brings it in line with mod_disk_cache in maxing out my network.
Time to craft some better tests or find a faster network... -- justin
I can probably help with the latter :)
Can you send me details of your setup and I'll try to test later this
ok.. so I've started playing with mod-cache again, and I noticed the
following:
- there is no way to cache something with query-args which doesn't
return a expires tag.
proposal: add a CacheIgnoreNoExpires directive so that we can cache them
- Even if we add a optional function to ignore the
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 2:48 PM +1000 Ian Holsman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really, but I'd like to see a patch posted to this list first before
committing it. There's a couple ways I could see implementing this, but
not sure which way you are intending
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to write a sample Plugin on APACHE 2.0 which does some
initialization.
I am attaching the code portion for the same.
static void mod_register_hooks(apr_pool_t *p)
{
ap_hook_child_init(mod_init_Child, NULL,NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
East fax: 1.908.575.7474
Bridgewater, NJ 08807 cel: 1.732.618.0250
Ian Holsman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://parent-chatter.com -- what do parents know?
tackling this another way.
how hard would it be to use something like mod_fastcgi of instead of
the standard CGI interface?
On 21/06/2006, at 8:00 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Mendonce, Kiran (STSD) wrote:
We tried using mod_cgi with worker. And its very slow. So that's
not an
option we
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache 2.0.x - has to use APR 0.9.x
Apache 2.2.x - has to use APR 1.2.x
Apache 2.3.x - has to use APR 1.3.x
is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x
Hey Bill
just to clarify these are LOCAL DoS attacks? ie you need access to the
machine (or the ability to execute php) in order for this to be an issue?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Published - ergo moving discussion from security@ to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course if in the course of this
Tim Bray wrote:
On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
As it is currently written, I don't think it makes too much sense to put
it into httpd -- but if we could work on abstracting down a core, and a
set of separate hooks for storage + maybe a way to easily build end user
display, I
Hi.
This one is frustrating me to no end, and was wondering if some BSD/OSX
guru can help me out a bit.
I'm using the trunk, and trying to start apache, but I keep getting a
lock/sem problem
[Fri Aug 24 10:51:53 2007] [emerg] (28)No space left on device: Couldn't
create accept lock
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 24/08/07, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
This one is frustrating me to no end, and was wondering if some BSD/OSX
guru can help me out a bit.
I'm using the trunk, and trying to start apache, but I keep getting a
lock/sem problem
[Fri Aug 24 10:51:53
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/24/2007 05:30 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 7:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 8/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed it, I'll
Nick Kew wrote:
Our subrequest API currently handles only local subrequests,
so for example mod_include doesn't support
!--#include virtual=http://example.com/example.txt--.
I've worked around this in the past with some ugly hacks.
Looking at the code, it's actually very simple to build
in
Akins, Brian wrote:
-1 from me (if that counts.)
Using ProxyPass should be fine for 95% of the use cases??
ProxyPass /cnn http://www.cnn.com/
!--#include virtual=/cnn/WORLD/index.html --
yes.
if you:
a. have a static small number of hosts
b. those hosts don't change often
if either of
Hi.
I just checked out the latest trunk of apr httpd on my mac, and can't
build it anymore. it is complaining about apr_socket_sendfile not being
defined.
so I checked .. and apr.h has APR_HAS_SENDFILE as 0.
the problem is sendfile_nonblocking calls apr_socket_sendfile ;(
Thanks Paul,
I didn't realize the trunk wasn't 2.2.x.. otherwise I would have just
fixed it myself ;-)
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
Hi.
I just checked out the latest trunk of apr httpd on my mac, and
can't build it anymore. it is complaining about
Hi Phil,
A while back I wrote a auth wrapper which used a MD5 hash inside a
cookie to determine if the user was authenticated. If the cookie was
invalid or not present it would fall back to the regular auth method (in
your case a DB hit).
It also had a bit which sat just after the
Paul Querna wrote:
My intention is for this to be a wide open brainstorming thread.
I expect that we will be able to discuss several ideas in much more
detail at the Hackathon next week, but I really want to get all ideas
'on the table'.
I have a few things I would like to see, but I am
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 12/3/05, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd also like to brainstorm a better solution to running Rails/Django
applications inside of the httpd process than the SCGI/FastCGI solution
which most people use.
Out of curiosity, what do you think is wrong
I'm not sure why we aren't just reading the plen at the same time as the
clen... but as is when the 2nd header is read, it is not in sync (out by
padding-len bytes)
this patch makes it read at the same time, and it seems to make the
handler work for larger responses (as the following header
this allows you to pass a 'path' to the fast cgi process
to use:
ProxyPass /forum fcgi-tcp://127.0.0.1:8005/foruX
request
/forum/zx will have a path_info of /foruX/zx
posting it as a patch, as the code is a bit fugly.
Index: mod_proxy_fcgi.c
Brian Akins wrote:
This is a rather nasty patch (sorry). Basically, it changes the way
arrays and tables are stored on disk. This allows us to do a much
cleaner and quicker read_array and read_table. It cuts down
significantly on the number of disk reads for header files (one big one)
and
Hi.
It looks like recently some people have changed how authorization is
working on the trunk.
Could those people please
1. add a note to docs/upgrading.html to document what us idiots need to
do to get our config to work again?
2. change httpd-std.conf so it doesn't reference the
Hi Joshua:
httpd.conf.in has the new structure
httpd-std.conf (the one I was looking at) didn't ;(
regards
maybe if mod_access_compat is included by default statically into httpd
itself? (unless explicitly disabled)
we could make it optional in 2.6 (and remove docs on it), and remove in
2.8 or something. this will give people plenty of time to switch over.
David Reid wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
My only thoughts is that if you could integrate with ICP (which squid
uses) it might make it easier to get mod_cache_shared installed, tested,
and used in large organizations who already use a caching solution.
That way they could put a single mod_cache_shared into their existing
pool and see
don't think really took off)
and 2 active comitters.
so.. lets get brainstorming. Let's see HTTP get the prize for most
ideas (and beat those java weanies)
--Ian
--
Ian Holsman ++61-3-9877-0909
in this place it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the
same place. - Lewis Caroll
can work with him as well )
To clarify, I really meant to say mod_memcache, the client part,
not the server.
Was just an idea, I can help in some way as well. I have a working
prototype now.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
--
Ian Holsman ++61-3-9818-0132
)
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
const char *encoding;
/* only work on main request/no subrequests */
-if (!ap_is_initial_req(r)) {
+if (r-main != NULL) {
ap_remove_output_filter(f);
return ap_pass_brigade(f-next, bb);
}
--
Ian Holsman
Be careful when it comes to scoping work.
I found last year that some students last year will do what is asked
for, not more.
On 19/04/2006, at 9:59 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 4/18/06, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it sounds like we have got some pretty good ideas so far
host
selection a hook as well? I have a few really strange setups that
would be alot easier to configure if I could override how the
virtual host is selected.
Thoughts?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
--
Ian Holsman ++61-3-9818-0132
in this place it takes
you could design the mailing list software *to*
obsfucate personal
email addresses (similar to what gmane does).
It is just that the status quo isn't there yet for mailing lists.
--Ian
--
Ian Holsman
Ian_at_Holsman.NET
Never forget that you are unique, like everyone else.
huh?
why is the licensing terms stopping us recommending something?
we recommend VC2005 for windows and that it commercial, I don't see
the difference.
(and yes.. I saw mads's comment that this studio is free if your
register)
On 17/06/2006, at 4:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On
personally I think GET HEAD processing should be identical until
the very last moment.
this avoids bugs creeping in which process the body for some reason
and add a header after mod_deflate is run
(I can't think of any which do this BTW)
are you seeing a problem somewhere Ruediger?
regards
On 18/07/2006, at 8:06 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
(I can't think of any which do this BTW)
are you seeing a problem somewhere Ruediger?
The biggest problem at the moment is that I fear that I do not get
your point correctly :-).
So some explanations from your side would be very helpful
for
speed freaks!')
--
Ian Holsman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://car-chatter.com/ where car fanatics meet
Cliff Woolley wrote:
For any committers interested: we're going to do a lunch meeting tomorrow
(Monday) over lunch. Place TBA. I propose Hamburger Mary's since it's
close and I haven't been there yet this year.
--Cliff
would you care to post a abbreivated dialouge/notes from the meeting up
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
I think people rely on apache 1.3 stability and security. many people
consider httpd-2.0 as too young and don't try to understand why it's
better.
Does somebody have some percentage about 1.3 use and 2.0 ?
I don't think 1.3 is still here because of modules, there is too
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
I have attached a small filter module that strips leading whitespace
from text files. This would typically be used to remove the indenting
whitespace found inside HTML files, resulting in a significant reduction
in network traffic
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Brian Pane wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
A thread per-connection that is currently being processed.
Yeah, SEDA's model of processing stages--basically a succession of
thread pools through
which a request passes, each with a queue in front--looks like a
hi.
I'm building from a clean slate (new box) and am having issues building it.
It seems not to be including the stuff in listen.c
its OS/X 10.3.6 with november's gcc patch.. no fink on it either.
/ex/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -faltivec -mcpu=7450
-mtune=7450 -mpowerpc
Paul Querna wrote:
+1 for promoting it to beta status.
+1 for making it beta.. time to get some more people to shake the bugs out.
been using it on OS/X for a while now and it seems not to crash every 5
seconds ;-)
Ian
The biggest hurdle 2.0 has had to face IMO is:
- 1.3 isn't broken
- we run 1.3 already
- module XYZ only runs on 1.3
- 2.0 doesn't do anything that 1.3 doesn't do anyway
What I would suggest for your marketing campaign would be to write and
submit several technical articles about apache2 and how
Title: Out of Office AutoReply:
i am currently out of the office until May 23rd.
if the matter is urgent, please contact tech-pma or
my manager Paul Osterhus
to complete.
http://survey.zilbo.com/dev.survey
I wish I could say there was a prize being given away if you fill it
out, but there isn't..
This is 'opensource' research.. I don't have a marketing budget ;-)
Regards
Ian Holsman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Did you know a tools on Unix/Linux system, which should be able to
monitor in real-time the error_log of Apache2 servers and for example,
send email/syslog message when a [error] string is detected ?
Regards and thanks for your help
look for a tool called
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 4:20 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
So, to accommodate this, we would need a mod_smtpd space in subversion
and a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
-1. The point of SoC is to get more people involved in open
source projects, not to encourage the ASF to
Sergio Leonardi wrote:
Hi all
I'm a newbie and I'd like to plan to add to mod_cache a directive like this
one, if possible.
What could be the correct procedure to do it? Am I sending the message to
the wrong place?
Hi Sergio.
It sounds like a great idea.
How do you plan on implementing
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Hi,
As I already said, the AJAX browser in mod_mbox relies on a hidden
XmlHttpRequest and on Javascript processing of the replied XML
document to generate the message list.
After setting up a browser stub, I'm not going to concentrate on
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 7/13/05 6:41 PM, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a pool of threads read the queue and start fetching the content, and
re-filling the cache with fresh responses.
How is this better than simply having an external cron job to fetch the
urls? You have total
This was a private message. I will continue this one offline.
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 7/13/05 6:36 PM, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There.
just remember that this project is Parin's SoC project, and he is
expected to do the code on it.
sure. I am expected to do what's best
Parin Shah wrote:
On 7/15/05, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:23:29AM -0500, Parin Shah wrote:
- we need to maintain a counter for url in this case which would
decide the priority of the url. But mainting this counter should be a
low overhead operation,
Akins, Brian wrote:
This patch adds a new hook (request_status) that gets ran in proxy_handler
just before the final return. This gives modules an opportunity to do
something based on the proxy status.
A couple of examples where this is useful:
-You are using a caching module and would rather
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:12 AM 7/17/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ianh
Date: Sat Jul 16 22:12:10 2005
New Revision: 219372
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=219372view=rev
Log:
This patch adds a new hook (request_status) that gets ran in proxy_handler
just before the
Parin Shah wrote:
you should be using a mix of
# requests
last access time
cost of reproducing the request.
Just to double check, we would insert entry into the 'refresh queue'
only if the page is requested and the page is soon-to-be-expired. once
it is in the queue we would use above
Hi Neale
what does removing the package line do?
doesn't it remove the function from their grouping on the modules page?
and the removal of the deffunc prototype... why?
Neale Ranns wrote:
hi,
I'm new to the project and have been reading the code to see how it all
works and i've been fixing
Akins, Brian wrote:
As I sit here debugging our home grown proxy code for 2.0, I wonder how long
until 2.2? We wrote our own proxy because the cool 2.1 stuff was not out at
the time. The new proxy stuff would be wonderful for us, but noone wants to
run alpha code in production. (However, we
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I assume CTR ?
Hey Jim
can you post the patch ?
while this discussion about
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
For a month or two now I've been using the cross reference that was
linked from the developer documentation page. Then it went away for
awhile and now its back with some weird crippled version that can't do
wild card searches for identifiers. The source navigation is
Hi Neale.
I'll go through and review the patch today.
I'll try to get it commited in a couple of hours.
Neale Ranns wrote:
Sander,
I put a patch here (http://www.ranns.org/~ndrr/apache2/), it's kinda big
to be emailing to all. There is also a tar ball there of the html files
if anyone would
Brian Pane wrote:
On the subject of asynchronous write completion, I've drawn a connection
state model that
combines the current state transitions of the event MPM with new states
for write completion
and the handler phase.
Comments welcome... Am I missing any state transitions (particularly
I don't see why not.
Committed.
regards
Ian
Brian J. France wrote:
Any reason why this patch couldn't be applied to allow the option of
building mod_dbd?
The title might need a little tweaking.
Thanks,
Brian
- with no commit access
Index: modules/experimental/config.m4
Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Hi,
It's been one month that my SoC project is now over. I even received
the money from Google. Thanks again to all of you for your help and
support during the summer.
For now, I would really like to see something moving around
mod_mbox. I did not get any news from the
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:46:56 -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
Steven Roussey wrote:
pstack should be able to find the symbols if you compile and link with
-g
Yes, and ./configure with --without-execstrip helps quite a bit too... :)
Now, pstack simply segfaults.
[root@morpheus root]#
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:22:28 -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Of course you still won't be able to embed php scripts in SSI tags (w/o
doing unnatural things) but who really cares?
how so?
if we just make a rule saying that sub-requests don't get post data then
we could handle multiple php scripts
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:47:52 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
is php re-entrant? or does it use globals/thread specific storage. if it
does than php can not be used in a subrequest.
It's not reentrant-safe and it uses TLS.
- Sascha
ok.. then we have a major problem, limiting the
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:42:49 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
As for the Apache2+PHP stuff, we are not deflecting blame. We are simply
not acknowledging that it is somehow our duty to drop everything and
support Apache2 just because someone decided it was a good idea to release
a new web server.
Hi Min.
I'm not sure if this would make a difference in 2.0.43,
but you might want to configure apache to use non-portable-atomics
--enable-nonportable-atomics=yes
I think the worker MPM can then take advantage of this, and remove a
mutex lock (replacing it with a spin) which may give you
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:42:30 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
change optional function to return the previous writer, allowing to
have mutliple types
of writers in the same server. (previously you could only have one)
it needs a mmn bump.. sorry guys
Umm, okay, I give up... why does it
Hi Chris.
can you do me a favor, and put a TCPdump of the interaction somewhere.
and if you could either to a truss/strace and/or a GDB br so we know
what part of the code is looping hanging.
also, can you try disabling proxyreceivebuffersize proxypreservehost
and see if that makes a
Jeff Trawick wrote:
*not to share is a bit strong... our Apache2-based server is freely
available for download and the modifications made to pure Apache2+APR
are provided in a patch file that gets installed... but that isn't what
I usually mean by sharing code :)
do you have a link for
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
My bad, I was looking for
log_pfn_register
not
APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE
APR_RETRIEVE_OPTIONAL_FN
Thanks again.
On Monday 03 March 2003 19:00, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
While I'm thinking about it, this reallly seems like something a lot of
modules could want. Are there
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:47 PM 3/3/2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:22 PM 3/3/2003, Juan Rivera wrote:
Anybody has done a security audit for Apache?
Wouldn't this be a question for [EMAIL PROTECTED] or even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doh... of course I meant to say [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
|
| On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Paul Querna wrote:
|
|
|so. What does everyone thing about including this in apache-2.1?
|
|
| Though a separate auth module tree was discussed for things like this -
| note that this module is very
how about we put these 2 presentations on the 'offical' site and link to
them from developer docs?
http://www.apache.org/~jwoolley/bucketbrigades/bucketbrigades.pdf
http://www.apache.org/~gregames/ap2filters.ppt
Original Message
Subject: Re: [apache-modules] Looking for Filter
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:04 PM 3/11/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ianh2003/03/11 10:04:37
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS
docs/manual/mod Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH mod_deflate.xml
modules/filters Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH
ok..
can someone remind me what we are supposed to do in this situation?
Although I dislike putting in 'unvoted' changes into the stable release,
I hate having 2 seperate sets of code, with bits pieces of each other
in them worse.
André Malo wrote:
* Ian Holsman wrote:
[2.0.45
we did some testing ~1 year ago with the different thread library on
solaris 8 and didn't notice any real significant difference,
libmtmalloc.so on the other hand was a pretty big win.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 12/3/03 1:02, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any experiences good or bad
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The X-Forwarded-For would contain something like 192.168.1.2:19876 (instead
of just the first bit before the ':'), and I would need to add another
header containing the IP of the client connection (I was thinking about
something like:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:00:18AM +0900, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 12:02 AM, Thomas Eibner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:27:30PM +0900, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
Resending this to this list as I got no response on users list.
Tony Finch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:14:44AM -0500, Nomentsoa-Tahiry Ramanampanoharana wrote:
Instead of writing a new module from the scratch. I don't
know if it's a good idea to look at mod_rewrite RewriteMap
internal function first.
I recommend against using mod_rewrite wherever
Stas Bekman wrote:
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
I have 'data' datas long 'lenght'. If I try to modify
the data I get and to send it again inside the bucket,
it doesnt work.
What kind of buckets do you have before you try to modify them? You
can't modify some
Steve Sabljak wrote:
Currently with apache 2.0.43 (64 bit, Solaris 8, worker mpm), under high load,
we're seeing lots of connection refused to the cgi daemon in the error log.
Am I right in saying mod_cgid forks new processes as they're required?
Would a pre-forking cgi daemon be worth
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo