Hiya, I'd like to integrate distcache support into mod_ssl on HEAD: are
the copyright holders willing to contribute copyright ownership to the
ASF for ssl_scache_dc.c and the other changes?
I've rediffed the published patch for 2.0.48 against HEAD, attached for
review. Changes relative to the
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:52:51AM -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
On November 26, 2003 07:05 am, Joe Orton wrote:
Hiya, I'd like to integrate distcache support into mod_ssl on HEAD: are
the copyright holders willing to contribute copyright ownership to the
ASF for ssl_scache_dc.c and the other
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:27:48PM -0500, Christopher Jastram wrote:
Just checked out the latest Apache CVS because I need the dav_lock
module...
make[4]: *** No rule to make target `ssl_scache_shmht.slo', needed by
`mod_ssl.la'. Stop.
What's up with this?
You need to re-run buildconf
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:52:03AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
FWIW, it segfaults on a jsp request... I suppose that this is handled by a
third party module such as mod_jk? See the final snippet:
[pid 32119] read(11, GET /messaging/businessObject.js..., 4096) = 775
[pid 32119]
So (Ben), what is it that breaks with BSD make when reverting the
cruft that has been added to server/Makefile.in to use an absolute path
to exports.c? This works for me with srcdir=builddir and
srcdir!=builddir with the FreeBSD 4.2 make, and GNU make -j2 still works
too.
The 2.0 branch still
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:24:38AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2003/12/10 05:43:14
Modified:server main.c
Log:
* server/main.c (suck_in_expat): Remove function, USE_EXPAT is never
defined.
Does anyone have clues about the other hacks
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:47:37PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 08:39:27AM -0500, Brian Akins wrote:
I wonder if this
binary would run on an older processor (running a modern version of linux).
AFAIK, yes. It's standard x86 assembly.
All: Please correct
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:24:31PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
diff -u -u -r1.66 -r1.67
--- mod_charset_lite.c 7 Nov 2003 01:01:27 - 1.66
+++ mod_charset_lite.c 15 Dec 2003 14:24:31 - 1.67
@@ -307,7 +307,16 @@
mime type
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 04:31:32PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ben 2004/01/03 08:31:32
Modified:server gen_test_char.c
Log:
Make forensic logging safe for POST data. The issue with strchr and NUL is
a red herring.
I don't think this is a safe change: 0 is now
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:43:03AM +, amit athavale wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the patch for fix of PR#21779.
I am not sure whether I have added that code at best/ideal place, so
please review it and let me know if there is another place where I can
put that check.
Thanks Amit, I
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:32:29PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, is it wise to add a configure option for it?
how do you mean? I was trying to make it just a compile time option,
similar to -DBIG_SECURITY_HOLE (which seems to me a bigger
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:49:15PM -0700, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Attached are 2.0.48 numbers on RH AS 2.1 and 3.0.
Apache is build with worker MPM and default options on both versions.
C:
Apache is servicing more requests per sec on 2.1 on 1 and 2 CPUs, 3.0
is picking up the slack
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Rather than using multiple symbols (HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H, HAVE_PRCTL), which
would add to the CFLAGS, there is a single symbol HAVE_SET_DUMPABLE
which is defined via CFLAGS if all prerequisites are met.
testing:
Fedora Core 1:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:43:07PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
Hello, Apache folk. After showing this bug to gstein, iholsman, and
others in IRC, I fear I may have found a real bug. It has something
to do with SSL, but it's not clear whether this is a bug in the Neon
library,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 07:21:08PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
% sh buildconf
rebuilding srclib/apr/configure
buildconf: checking installation...
buildconf: autoconf version 2.59 (ok)
buildconf: libtool version 1.5a (ok)
Copying libtool helper files ...
cat: aclocal.m4: No such file or
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:27:23PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 17:26, Joe Orton wrote:
Is there still a TCP connection between the client and server at this
point? If so, you can identify the server child in question via the
server-status output or netstat -pt
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:46:31PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
Yes. The above was from my November libtool HEAD. I just upgraded now
to today's libtool HEAD, and
% sh buildconf | tee buildconf.out
rebuilding srclib/apr/configure
buildconf: checking installation...
buildconf: autoconf
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:37PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
Essentially a build of httpd-cvs on NetBSD-1.6ZG/i386, autoconf 2.59, cvs
libtool, gcc 3.3.2, goes fine until the final link to -o httpd:
/usr/lib/crt0.o(.text+0x86): In function `___start':
: undefined reference to `main'
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:16:35PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:24:37PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:37PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
modules.o(.data+0x4): undefined reference to `authn_file_module'
...
Have any of you seen
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:13:36PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:19:34PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:16:35PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
libtool: link: libtool library `mod_authn_file.la' must begin with `lib'
Yeah, you have to switch
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:45:01AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
On 15.01.2004, at 09:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26149
Apache 2.0.48 won't load Tomcat 4.1.29 in-process via JK2
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-15
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:31:18PM -0600, Art Haas wrote:
Hi.
I've been building and using what will be httpd-2.1 for months. Just
within the last week or two, my builds have all failed when I try to run
them. As others are certainly running the CVS head builds without
problems, I'm hoping
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:35:34PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
Sorry to be so slow in getting back to you, Joe. I'm still desperately
looking for a clue on this SSL hang that happens when I run 'apachectl
graceful'.
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 15:51, Joe Orton wrote:
The client
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 04:29, Joe Orton wrote:
I have now managed to reproduce hangs a couple of times here,
What exactly was your reproduction recipe? Same as mine? Start an
import over SSL and then 'graceful' the server
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:22:14AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
pud wrote:
okay, please forgive me, s/mod_cgi/mod_ssl/g, sorry...
hey, sorry to disturb you, but,,,
i read in the apache2 changelog that you fixed an streaming bug
in the mod_cgi - but i think it still exists...
(at least in
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:02:50PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
...
* for some reason, the 'rotatelogs' process dies. It's not clear
whether it's responding to a signal, or if the httpd parent is
killing it, or what. A new 'rotatelogs' takes its place, with new
httpd
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:04:38AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* mod_dav: Reject requests including fragment part in the Request-URI.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/dav/main/mod_dav.c?r1=1.102r2=1.103
PR: 21779
+1: jorton
+
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:48:33AM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:28:28PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
Hmm, and then? I'd see it as a workaround for buggy clients like the
redirect-carefully variable.
It's a matter of degree.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 04:55:34PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 08:07, Joe Orton wrote:
Nice, this is easy enough to reproduce. It only fills up because the
httpd children all have the read end of the pipe open, which is a bug in
itself. Applying below ensures
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:51:39PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rederpj 2004/02/03 13:51:39
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS
modules/metadata Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH mod_expires.c
Log:
*) Add support for IMT minor-type wildcards (e.g.,
I've seen some unclean shutdown errors a few times but never managed to
get a repro case. What client are you using, how do you reproduce this?
I presume you have the same SetEnvIf ssl-unclean-shutdown settings for
broken clients when comparing 1.3 and 2.0 behaviour?
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:03:29PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Okay. here's what I think is happening : (Client = C Server - S)
You're right, the alert is never getting sent!
C - S : initiates connection
C - S : handshake
S - C : server sends application data
S - C : server
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:30:00PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
IOW, the following patch works.
Question: Is there any other hook / pool-cleanup thing that I can hook the
ssl_filter_io_shutdown() logic into ?
No, that can't be right either, it would close the connection after each
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:08:37AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, February 8, 2004 5:27 PM + Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This adds a finish_connection hook as discussed with Madhu, and uses it
in mod_ssl to ensure that the SSL close_notify alert is sent before
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:39:08AM +, UHISWdev UHISWdev wrote:
Apache 2.0.48 - mod_userdir won't serve from an nfs mount on Linux kernel
2.4.21-166-smp4G
Apache 1.3.x works fine but nothing comes out of Apache 2.
On the previous kernel it would serve files 255 bytes but now it doesn't
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 02:35:07PM +, UHISWdev UHISWdev wrote:
hmm.. interesting. Thanks Brian but what do you class as local? We
mounted another linux machine directly into the apache tree with no
probs. The problems only appear when you use ncpmount to mount a
netware machine. Unix to
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:12:17AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
I am having a hassle with a server running httpd v2.0.47 in that it
refuses to restart cleanly after an unclean shutdown. Before Apache will
start again, the SSL session cache file needs to be manually deleted.
Is this problem
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:22:56AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
requiring automake is not something I personally would be excited about... I'd
like to see how bad a conversion to ordinary sh would turn out.. also, I'd
guess that a conversion to the less cool but more widely
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:41:55AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
...
+
+/* Our static variables get reset between first and second pass ... so this
+ * variable is mixed in key-value strings and incremented. On the second pass,
+ * the key-values will match so will replace, rather than
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:55:13PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
However I completely disagree that Python (or Perl or PHP) is
a good choice for use in build systems.
As part of the configure process, I would agree with you, but as part
of
buildconf, I disagree--not everyone needs
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Please get your facts straight.
httpd is still just as buildable on such platforms regardless of
gen-build.py: from the release tarballs. Building from a CVS checkout
cannot be done without extra tools, but that has
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:05PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I started working on Justin's idea of creating a EOC bucket - to
do a SSL shutdown before the socket close(). But since the
ap_flush_conn is called just before closing the socket - I
thought of
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:59:00AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
This is just back to what we had patches for already: doing an SSL
shutdown on any EOF bucket, right? Which is not right since you get an
EOS
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:12:33PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
More feedback incorporated !
ap_flush_conn can just use a single brigade with two buckets, no extra
variables needed there, also needs s/APU_DECLARE/AP_DECLARE in
eoc_bucket.c, and perhaps the prototypes are more appropriate
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:53:00PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
There must be some simple explanation, but this is very annoying as 'cvs
up' in httpd-2.0 keeps on colliding at these files:
M modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.c
M modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.h
M modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.c
This should
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:37:46AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
Question: Can we use the environment variables setup by mod_ssl
in the RewriteCond directive ?
Not like in 1.3; in 2.0 you can use %{LA-U:ENV:...} to fetch the SSL
variables via a subrequest; a better
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:34:06AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This checks for a couple of common conditions which prevent core dumps from
being taken and writes a NOTICE message to the error log at startup if the
condition is detected. BTW, the same code works with 1.3 with very minor
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:42:36PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:37:46AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
Question: Can we use the environment variables setup by mod_ssl
in the RewriteCond directive
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:47:21PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. But we'd need to hook the variable creation earlier anyway,
since ssl_var_lookup finally just uses r-subprocess_env.
I don't see how that follows; if you're just trying
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:41:54AM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Mathihalli, Madhusudan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a slightly modified version of Joe's patch to
- not segfault if rewrite_ssl_var_lookup is not available (mod_ssl not
loaded)- use SSL environment variables as
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:08:25AM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not really convinced about using ssl_var_lookup_ssl: that function
does not handle the HTTPS variable, and it would be potentially
confusing to users and hard to document since only some
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:49:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2004/03/01 09:49:52
Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
Log:
add eoc_bucket.c to project
I'm not qualified to review Win32 changes but did you mean to remove
/incremental:no from the linker flags here as
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:00:25AM +, Alexis Huxley wrote:
I'm running apache 2.1dev, and I've posted to the -user list with
no response, so now I'm a bit stuck as to where next to try, so I'm
posting here. Apologies if this is the wrong place.
The bug is that the POD code is doing a name
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 01:48:15PM -0500, Aryeh Katz wrote:
I'm not quite sure how to submit a patch to bugzilla, so can someone
please take care of the following for me.
In addition, and corrections/better ways would be greatly appreciated.
That one is actually fixed on HEAD though ab's SSL
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:08:28PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I would like to resurrect an old discussion. About a year and half
ago rbb and wrowe committed a patch for mod_ssl to provide the SSLEngine
upgrade capability. It seems that one of the reasons for not back
porting it to the
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:08:21AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/03/06 19:08:21
Modified:modules/arch/netware mod_nw_ssl.c
Log:
Add the ssl_is_https() and ssl_var_lookup() optional functions to the mod_nw_ssl
module for Netware
If you intend mod_nw_ssl to be
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface.
Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump?
I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the minor MMN more than
once between releases and it's
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:38:48AM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface.
Shouldn't this be a minor MMN
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:47:10PM -0800, Andy Cutright wrote:
apacheweek has announced a vulnerability:
http://www.apacheweek.com/features/security-20
the bugzilla problem report indicates this diff fixes the problem:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:59:44AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
I've been using the sslswamp tool (which btw is great) to stress
apache - and once in a while, I keep getting a 'abortive close'
with the following message in the error_log. Any ideas why this
is
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:14:00PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
madhum 2004/03/09 10:14:00
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
Log:
Propose a backport (for mod_rewrite to recognize SSL variables)
Thanks for committing that Madhu. The mod_ssl.h-ssl_private.h
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:07:52PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:02:03PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc1 tarballs available for testing...
+1
Looks good over here (though I had trouble running the testsuite on x86_64).
There was an httpd-test
By uncommenting just one line from the default config you can get to
this misconfiguration:
NameVirtualHost *:80
VirtualHost _default_:443
/VirtualHost
which is not handled properly by the vhost code - httpd serves requests
with c-base_server == NULL, httpd -tS segfaults, etc.
The check below
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
It seems libtool does not know how to build shared libraries on BSD/OS
5.x; try editing srclib/apr/configure and search'n'replace the places
where it says bsdi4 to read bsdi5. (this is clearly not a
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:32:01PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
It seems
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:19:00PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2004/03/15 12:19:00
Modified:server Makefile.in
Log:
Add missing source
It was already there, I've reverted this. Did you run buildconf after
updating?
util_script.c util_md5.c
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
- Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:03 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
portability bugs to [EMAIL
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:59:45PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Flops on BSD/OS 5.X
PLEASE accommodate for BSD/OS 5.X
Looks like you may have missed previous message(s) on this topic. To
make any progress on this issue, please attach the complete output of
configure to the bug report:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:51:41PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Do we need to do the following ? I tried it - the test continued to a
certain extent, only to fail again after some time (with the same
stack trace)
What's the repro case for this? You're running swamp against an
SSL-HTTP
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:04:05PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
I think the correct fix is to stop trying to send the shutdown from the
cleanup, which didn't actually work anyway. Can you test something
like
Are those who can reproduce this segfault using a reverse proxy to an
SSL backend (i.e. SSLProxyEngine on)? That case is certainly one trigger
for the problem: mod_proxy does not call ap_flush_conn so the EOC bucket
is never sent. (there may still be other triggers)
joe
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:41:23AM -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
On March 24, 2004 11:45 pm, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE 2.0 STATUS:
[snip]
TODO ISSUES REMAINING IN MOD_SSL:
[snip]
* the shmcb code should just align its memory segment rather than
jumping through
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 09:20:37AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
Are those who can reproduce this segfault using a reverse proxy to an
SSL backend (i.e. SSLProxyEngine on)?
[SNIP]
Yes and No :)
Yes - I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 03:28:38PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hello,
Apart from flagging OpenSSL to NOT lookup the internal cache for
session-id's, we should ALSO tell OpenSSL to NOT store the
sessions ! This fixes my problem where the httpd process size
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:47:34AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
Nice! So this is the fix for #26562? Don't forget to update
the comment
before you commit, and it looks like this is a new flag since OpenSSL
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:01:30PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hello,
Should we just ignore the rest of the processing in
core_output_filter after deleting the EOC bucket ?
Yes, I think so, but by not leaving last_e pointing at a deleted bucket
it can be done without the
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:58:46AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Sounds good - but you still need to delete the last_e.
This is what I asked before - why? The apr_brigade_destroy(b) call
deletes the EOC bucket along with all the others a few lines further on
AFAICT.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:51:50PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -200,10 +202,11 @@
*) mod_dav: Send an EOS at the end of the multistatus brigade.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/dav/main/mod_dav.c?r1=1.105r2=1.106
+1: jorton
+
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:02:21AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Any reason why expires set by mod_expires are not added to redirected
requests? Should I hack up my own expires that does?
Are you using 2.0.49? There's a fix for setting Expires on error
responses in that version, it seems to work
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:09:03PM +0200, Marc Stern wrote:
When using Apache as a proxy:
( brower --https-- Apache + mod_proxy --https-- Web server )
the Web server never receives the user's certificate info, because only the
proxy is seen by the Web server. That means that all headers
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hello,
On my HP-UX 11i box (64-bit os), if I build a 32-bit app
(default), the apr_off_t is a 4-byte entity and apr_int64_t is a
8-byte entity. I'm sure more than one person has experienced
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:00:24AM -0700, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
apr_off_t is the right type to use since these are file offsets.
parse_byterange should probably check for integer overflow when
sizeof
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:43:34AM -0700, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
What if the user really sent a
large value for a small file ? Instead of erroring out -
thanks to the
overflow mechanism, we'll probably
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:36:14PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
I have just installed the latest published version of httpd (v2.0.49),
and the problem where httpd refuses to start unless the file
ssl_gcache_data is manually deleted beforehand is still there.
I recall some recent discussion
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:05:45PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2004/05/05 09:29:59
Index: STATUS
*) Readd suexec setuid and user check (now APR supports it)
os/unix/unixd.c: r1.69
+1: nd, trawick
+ +1: jorton, if
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:06:04PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2004/05/17 08:24:31
Modified:server core.c
Log:
* server/core.c (core_output_filter): Don't explicitly delete the EOC
bucket, and don't buffer the brigade if it ends in an EOC.
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
The above bug was posted about LDAP support not building on Solaris due
to ldap.h and lber.h being declared in the wrong order.
This patch has been committed to apr-util v1.0, what needs to be done to
get it committed to
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 08:23:51PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18989
...
Ok, my autoconf is really rusty.
What would need to be done to test for krb5.h under
/usr/kerberos/include using the right way of doing things...
Really, the right
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:14:30AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
This patch did it:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/main/http_request.c?r1=1.173r2=1.174
Backing out the patch also fixes a DAV regression. See
I'm working on a fix for #12355, the (infamous?) per-directory SSL
renegotiation vs request with bodies bug. The issue is explained at
length in ssl_engine_kernel.c; simply put: if an SSLRequire is specified
in a directory/location context, it's necessary to perform an SSL
handshake *after* the
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:40:52PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
AFAIK, the linux x86 atomic stuff can be used unchanged on Linux
x86_64. This is based on my digging in the kernel source. All the
functions apr uses are identical.
This is already done for APR HEAD: a backport would probably
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:48:31AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Mathias Herberts wrote:
What is the position of the Apache community on the passing of 'hop by
hop' headers to origin servers by mod_proxy? The code in proxy_http.c
says 'RFC2616 13.5.1 says we should strip these headers', but
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:21:07AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Don't see that anywhere. Either eaten by spam filters or a gerbil.
Anyway, I don't understand why this would have broken mod_dav. If mod_dav
wants a keepalive connection it should determine this prior to the ap_die
and set
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:04:23AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:21:07AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Don't see that anywhere. Either eaten by spam filters or a gerbil.
Anyway, I don't understand why this would have
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:04:45PM -0500, Avery, Ken wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to statically link libssl.a instead of libssl.so.x.
After doing a buildconf, configure and make; then ldd httpd on the
final executable to look at the shared library dependencies and
libssl.so.x id there. I
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 05:23:38PM -0400, Allan Edwards wrote:
Running ProxyPass with mod_deflate results in
an extraneous 20 bytes being tacked onto 304
responses from the backend.
The problem is that mod_deflate doesn't handle
the zero byte body, adds the gzip header and
tries to
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 09:54:56AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- STATUS 11 Jun 2004 21:05:21 - 1.751.2.920
+++ STATUS 12 Jun 2004 09:54:56 - 1.751.2.921
@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@
*) mod_ssl: Remove some unused functions (after CAN-2004-0488 fix is applied)
For precedent there have already been two binary backwards-incompatible
changes made on the 2.0 branch of such exposed but really private
interfaces:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/ssl/mod_ssl.h?r1=1.122.2.5r2=1.122.2.6only_with_tag=APACHE_2_0_BRANCH
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:45:26PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Actually I think this was addressed quite a while ago with the
introduction of the MaxMemFree directive. This problem sounds a lot
like the bucket issue where memory
1 - 100 of 1530 matches
Mail list logo
