1) Extending RewriteMap
===
I plan to extend key file handling in text file RewriteMap. At the
moment keys are always matched as exact strings against the map. I want
to add the ability to alternatively
a) match via regexp (and replace backreferences in the found values)
On 17.12.2009 14:32, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 13:38
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [Proposal for trunk] Extending RewriteMap, Reusing
ip network matches
1) Extending RewriteMap
On 17.12.2009 16:02, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 15:56
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal for trunk] Extending RewriteMap,
Reusing ip network matches
On 17.12.2009 14:32, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
On 17.12.2009 23:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
1) Extending RewriteMap
===
I plan to extend key file handling in text file RewriteMap. At the
moment keys are always matched as exact strings against the map. I want
to add the ability to alternatively
On 18.12.2009 00:36, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi,
Since I'm also interested in AAA in future Apache versions, I decided to
have a look at this.
In 2.4, *without* using the deprecated Satisfy via mod_access_compat,
you will always be prompted by basic auth, because the ip addresses are
only
On 18.12.2009 20:24, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.12.2009 23:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
1) Extending RewriteMap
===
I plan to extend key file handling in text file RewriteMap. At the
moment keys are always matched as exact
On 06.01.2010 12:18, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
I don't think there's much interest in merging any of the patches that
are currently in the STATUS, so I'm intending to a roll a 1.3.x
release Friday for testing/voting. With a release next week.
Unfortunately testing 1.3.x is more painful than it
On 08.01.2010 13:29, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
There is a 1.3.42 release candidate for testing, and voting, at;
http://people.apache.org/~colm/1.3.42/
md5, sigs good, tar.Z and tar.gz same contents.
I did only diff and build yet, not yet run and test, but already noticed
the
Hi Colm,
On 08.01.2010 21:53, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
File htdocs/manual/misc/FAQ.html was previously 150KB and now is only 5KB. I
didn't yet load it from the web server itself, but it seems some generation
step was
On 09.01.2010 12:58, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
There's one other manual related thing I wasn't thinking enough about before
writing my last mail: the 1.3.42 manual contains SSI #include virtual
statements, the 1.3.41
On 30.01.2010 19:40, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
A related question: I want to introduce a directive to set variables
that are expanded during config file parsing, just like environment
variables are. The problem I want to solve is that environment variables
cannot be changed during graceful restart.
On 31.01.2010 12:19, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
I ported mod_define to 2.0/2.2 a few years ago. You can have a look at
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_define/mod_define-current-src.tar.gz
It was originally written by Ralf S. Engelschall and distributed
On 14.02.2010 17:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12.02.2010 10:58, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Feb 12 09:58:48 2010
New Revision: 909323
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=909323view=rev
Log:
Support remote https proxies by using HTTP CONNECT.
PR: 19188
Submitted by:
Stefan: can you mail me your mod_reqtimeout 2.2.x backport patch? Since
p.a.o is still offline; i can not download your patch. I tested a
backport I made this morning and it looks fine. If it is identical to
yours, I'll vote immediately for it.
On 28.02.2010 15:04, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On
On 06.03.2010 00:43, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Mar 5 23:43:05 2010
New Revision: 919671
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919671view=rev
Log:
sf; please note you need to update xdocs/contributors/index.xml, not this one
Modified:
On 06.03.2010 14:17, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sat Mar 6 13:17:11 2010
New Revision: 919758
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919758view=rev
Log:
fix typo
Modified:
httpd/site/trunk/docs/contributors/index.html
httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/contributors/index.xml
Hi Stefan,
On 09.03.2010 22:20, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
BTW, can someone create a mod_reqtimeout entry in bugzilla?
Done.
There's a patch candidate for SSLInsecureRenegotiation for httpd 2.0.x at:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/SSLInsecureRenegotiation_httpd_2_0_x-backport-r917044.patch
I still have to test (even compile) so I didn't yet propose via STATUS.
Just wanted to prevent duplicate effort.
Will
On 22.03.2010 14:52, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the
coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while
we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer
to some 2.3 beta and further from any more
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM
under high load:
When an httpd child process gets closed due to the max spare threads
rule and it holds established client connections for which it has fully
received a keep alive request, but not yet send any part of the
On 23.03.2010 13:34, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM under
high load:
When an httpd child process gets closed due to the max spare threads rule
and it holds
Hi Gregg,
thanks for testing, see comments below.
On 24.03.2010 23:17, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.03.2010 14:52, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the
I agree there should be a release fixing (at least) CVE-2009
On 25.03.2010 00:20, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/24/2010 5:51 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
The server only needs server initiated renegotiations.
As repeated several times, there are apparently micro SSL implementations
out there in the wild, e.g. cell phone browsers, who choose to renegotiate
On 23.03.2010 15:30, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.03.2010 13:34, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with
On 25.04.2010 18:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what
are you using?
You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on
a
,
Rainer
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.03.2010 15:30, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Is that expected behaviour? It doesn't seem
reproducible for the worker
MPM
Rüdiger,
Jeff rolled back this change in r943648 after a comment by Joe and
committed an alternative approach in r943650.
Regards,
Rainer
On 13.05.2010 10:43, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10.05.2010 22:47, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon May 10 20:47:59 2010
New Revision:
On 28.05.2010 13:31, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Sergey Chernyshev
sergey.chernys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on helping people to have their sites fast by default and was
wondering if Apache HTTPD team can consider enabling a few modules by
default and maybe
On 01.06.2010 07:19, Jerome Renard wrote:
In 2010, IMO there is no good reason to have gzip disabled by default.
Almost all websites enable it. There are a handful of prominent
websites that do not. I've had conversations with a few of these
sites. Most of them have not turned it on because they
Situation: worker or event MPM. Process shutdown due to:
- MaxRequestsPerChild
- MaxSpareThreads
- Graceful stop or graceful restart
When an httpd child process shuts down due to the above conditions, it
doesn't respect existing Keep-Alive connections. When the previous
response signalled
I repeatedly inserted millisecond or microsecond timestamps as well as
PID and thread ID information into the ErrorLog when trying to diagnose
problems, most often in combination with additional log lines.
Due to the increased load and capability of systems and increasing
amount of
On 25.05.2010 15:09, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton
Sent: Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010 14:46
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RFC: drop support for OpenSSL 1.0 in trunk/2.3?
I'd like to drop support for versions of OpenSSL older than
1.0 in the
trunk
On 02.06.2010 18:23, Joe Orton wrote:
Thanks very much for all the responses. There is strong consensus for
retaining support for some varieties of 0.9.8 and possibly some 0.9.7.
A new RFC, then, for trunk/2.3 and beyond:
- support and build warning-free with OpenSSL= 0.9.8
- support and
On 02.06.2010 19:55, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Wed Jun 2 17:55:51 2010
New Revision: 950693
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=950693view=rev
Log:
instead of adding another escape, protect the backrefs as they're passed to sed.
/bin/dash on debian/ubuntu was getting
Whoever wishes to know, which module is enabled under what conditions: I
compiled a list avalable under
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/mods_enabled.txt
Most of it is done by the script
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/mods_enabled.pl
(it needs to be started in the trunk
Reading the feedback on the modules list I posted got me into thinking:
1) Should static module linking be still the default for httpd building?
Of course the question is only relevant for platforms which allow
dynamic linking and if we have APR_HAS_DSO. I know that static linking
is expected
On 03.06.2010 15:28, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Here's a missing piece: A good generic httpd build has DSOs for all
modules that could work on the system, but a nice httpd.conf loads only
the modules that are necessary. Meanwhile, our module build system
assumes that you wish to actively use the
On 02.06.2010 22:42, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I have updated my patch to the latest trunk and to use the variant
where the module for logging is selected with APLOG_USE_MODULE and
AP_DECLARE_MODULE macros:
...
Multi-file modules have to use APLOG_USE_MODULE in the other
files.
The patch is at
On 04.06.2010 23:57, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 04 June 2010, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
which are either pure bug fixes or pretty trivial. I will create a
new patch series without these soon, hopefully tomorrow.
The next iteration is at
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v5/
On 06.06.2010 13:35, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 05 Jun 2010, at 6:51 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The reason we don't see this problem very often is because we don't see
a 206 very often at this point in the code. The filter that does content
ranges sits after the CACHE_SAVE filter, and so under most
On 05.06.2010 21:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
During the build I also noticed, that mod_lua has two lines, where it
doesn't use APLOG_MARK but instead directly passes two file/line args
along.
Patch along the lines of the mod_ssl solution:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-trunk-per
On 03.06.2010 13:30, Rainer Jung wrote:
Reading the feedback on the modules list I posted got me into thinking:
1) Should static module linking be still the default for httpd building?
...
2) Which pre-cooked sets of modules to provide via configure?
Currently the default set (no configure
On 02.06.2010 17:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm planning on releasing an alpha of 2.3.6 next week in
hopes that we can push out a beta v. soon after.
I think my changes concerning building shared modules by default and
adding items to the error log format are complete. And I guess Stefans
log
On 01.06.2010 14:56, Rainer Jung wrote:
I repeatedly inserted millisecond or microsecond timestamps as well as
PID and thread ID information into the ErrorLog when trying to diagnose
problems, most often in combination with additional log lines.
Due to the increased load and capability
On 03.06.2010 16:49, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
4) General correlation improvements
To be able to correlate error and access log, it would be helpful
to share a common id, e.g. the unique_id, and be able to log it in
both files. The id generated
On 08.06.2010 10:21, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:23:26PM -, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jun 7 12:23:26 2010
New Revision: 952201
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952201view=rev
Log:
Add process id and thread id (if APR has thread support)
to the
On 08.06.2010 12:11, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 11:14
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r952201 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/log.c
On 08.06.2010 10:21, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:23
On 08.06.2010 10:21, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:23:26PM -, rj...@apache.org wrote:
These numbers made me double-take when reading error_log since they
don't have a descriptive prefix. Also the tid is not much use in a
non-threaded server. Could we do something like
On 08.06.2010 21:41, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Tue Jun 8 19:41:01 2010
New Revision: 952789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952789view=rev
Log:
Fix the test of ap_mpm_query's result:
Both AP_MPMQ_STATIC and AP_MPMQ_DYNAMIC mean threaded.
Thanks and especially for
On 08.06.2010 22:56, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 03.06.2010 16:49, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
4) General correlation improvements
To be able to correlate error and access log, it would be
helpful to share a common
On 09.06.2010 14:37, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I repeatedly inserted millisecond or microsecond timestamps as well
as PID and thread ID information into the ErrorLog when trying
On 10.06.2010 08:09, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/09/2010 10:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+#if __STDC_VERSION__= 199901L defined(APLOG_MAX_LOGLEVEL)
+/* need additional step to expand APLOG_MARK first */
+#define ap_log_perror(...)
On 12.06.2010 21:07, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 11 June 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in?rev=
951893r1=951892r2=951893view=diff
On 13.06.2010 13:29, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/12/2010 09:07 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 11 June 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in?rev=
951893r1=951892r2=951893view=diff
On 14.06.2010 21:45, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The asf-wide, site-dev team noticed our webring seems horribly dated,
just as the ASF list of 'apache resources' was. We should determine
how we might provide external/thirdparty links and under what set
of criteria.
The immediate question is;
I want to remove User, Group and ScoreBoardFile from the OS2 MPM.
The directives have an empty implementation ignore_cmd() and have only
been introduced for consistency with those MPMS which did support it.
In trunk User and Group are no longer MPM directives, they moved to
mod_unixd, and
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't get changed MPM behaviour as long as you don't change the
file contents. If we think the
On 15.06.2010 16:21, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:06 AM,rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Jun 15 13:06:14 2010
New Revision: 954862
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954862view=rev
Log:
Fix obsolete reference to 2.1 in CHANGES.
Likely we still have to clean
On 15.06.2010 17:58, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/15/2010 10:36 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't get
On 15.06.2010 18:30, Rainer Jung wrote:
Sorry for the noise, forget about the second addition, doesn't seem to
be the same thing (prepared statements vs. connection pools).
@@ -1131,11 +1082,6 @@ Changes with Apache 2.3.0
into the environment with the name AUTHENTICATE_COLUMN. This brings
The default configuration for various MPMs
differs from the example configuration file
conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.
Before bringing those two in sync, I want
to propose the values we want to use as new
defaults as well as for the extras configuration
file.
Prefork
===conf default
On 15.06.2010 22:51, Igor Galić wrote:
- Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts
differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't
would make the MPMs better comparable out of the box, but on the other
hand precisely this type of comparison might not make much sense.
On 6/15/2010 4:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
The default configuration for various MPMs
differs from the example configuration file
conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf
On 15.06.2010 23:20, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 15 Jun 2010, at 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
trunk CHANGES needs to track fixes/enhancements since the last alpha,
so the candidates for pruning would be in the section Changes with
Apache 2.3.0.
attached is a patch to prune 2.3.0 changes which
On 16.06.2010 04:27, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/15/2010 7:27 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Netware
===conf default proposed
StartThreads250 50 50
MinSpareThreads 25 10 25
On 11.06.2010 18:46, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ X] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
I built it on Solaris 8, Solaris 10 (both Sparc, using gcc), SuSE Linux
Hi Joe,
On 07.06.2010 23:16, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Jun 7 21:16:50 2010
New Revision: 952443
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952443view=rev
Log:
- make more robust against failure cases
Modified:
httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t
Modified:
On 18.06.2010 00:57, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello,
Currently the windows make file in trunk causes nmake on VC6/SDK 2003 R2
to fail on Line 511, VC9 does not seem to have a problem with it. I have
not tried on 10 and do not have 7 8.
The problem on 6 is if nmake/ide does not see the comment
On 21.06.2010 11:34, Brian Havard wrote:
On 21/06/10 09:20, Igor Galić wrote:
From docs/manual/upgrading.xml:
+liPlatform support has been removed for BeOS, OS/2, TPF, and
+ even older platforms such as A/UX, Next, and Tandem. These were
+ believed to be broken anyway./li
What
Hi Jim,
On 21.06.2010 14:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a FYI:
I've been trying to get this puppy released, but something
is *seriously* hosed with the whole svn sync process since,
even as of *today*, it looks like NO mirrors have the
2.3.6-alpha tarballs, even though they have been committed
On 21.06.2010 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There have been a few reports regarding how server-status leaks
info, mostly about our (the ASF's) open use of server-status and
how IP addresses are exposed.
I'm thinking about a patch that adjusts server-status/mod_status
to have a public vs. private
On 01.07.2010 04:23, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Speaking of 2.3.6, it would be nice to see it soonish too? Looking at
changes there are not a lot of them but the segfault is a bear, and it
brings downs Apache. It's been six months as well, seems a perfect
reason for a release.
Not sure what you
There's a patch at
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-trunk-adding-milliseconds-and-microseconds-to-the-access-log.patch
that adds configurable logging of sub second timestamp resolutions and
request end timestamps to the access log (all via %{...}t).
Any objections against adding
On 20.07.2010 00:39, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on making the error log format configurable. It's
more or less working now, but I could use some feed-back about the
config syntax. The difficulty is that many tokens only produce output in
some situations (e.g. no remote IP in
On 20.07.2010 21:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
message and behind the message. I guess you can get rid of the latter
split by assigning a format specifier also to the log message, like
'%M' or similar, and then
ErrorLogFormat [%{u}t] [%l] [pid %P%{:tid }T
On 21.07.2010 01:33, gst...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gstein
Date: Tue Jul 20 23:33:18 2010
New Revision: 966055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966055view=rev
Log:
Fix up some SSL configuration, per issue #49484. IE6 had a hotfix released
for this problem quite a while back (see kb
On 21.07.2010 12:59, Igor Galić wrote:
+SSLCipherSuite RC4-SHA:AES128-SHA:ALL:!ADH:!EXP:!LOW:!MD5:!SSLV2:!NULL
Reminds me a bit of:
http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2010/07/10/overclocking-mod_ssl/
Can't we simplify that to:
SSLCipherSuite RC4-SHA:AES128-SHA:HIGH:!ADH:!MD5
Since
On 21.07.2010 14:54, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2010 14:46
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r966055 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf.in
On 21.07.2010 12:59, Igor Galić wrote
On 21.07.2010 20:45, Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.16 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.16
Vote closes at 02:00 UTC on Saturday July 24 2010.
Just a quick info in case someone else also runs
On 22.07.2010 04:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.07.2010 20:45, Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.16 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.16
Vote closes at 02:00 UTC on Saturday July 24 2010.
Just a quick info
On 22.07.2010 04:52, Paul Querna wrote:
Ack-- I could re-tag with libtool 1.x, if we don't want to ship a modified
apr-util.
I always use an external expat it seems :(
Thoughts?
For the ASF release re-tag would be enough. There's a few people though,
that already ran into the same problem
On 22.07.2010 07:46, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/21/2010 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.07.2010 04:52, Paul Querna wrote:
Ack-- I could re-tag with libtool 1.x, if we don't want to ship a
modified apr-util.
I always use an external
On 22.07.2010 11:28, Paul Querna wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.07.2010 07:46, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/21/2010 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.07.2010 04:52, Paul Querna
On 21.07.2010 20:45, Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.16 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[+1] Release httpd-2.2.16
+1 for release.
Tested on Solaris 8 Sparc, SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 (32Bit and 64Bit).
- Signature and
On 28.07.2010 13:44, Dan Poirier wrote:
On 2010-07-28 at 03:51, Alex Wulmsalex.wu...@scarlet.be wrote:
Hi,
While adding some debug log statements to a module I'm working on, I ran
into the problem that ap_log_error (in apache 2.2) does not support %zd
or %zu conversion for type_t arguments.
On 29.07.2010 18:19, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:07 AM, bswen wrote:
httpd 2.2.16+: No more Win32 releases??
I think no one has gotten around to posting Win32 sources, that's all.
In addition: None of 2.2.16 yet made it to archive.a.o, neither eu nor
us. Seems something is
Hi Gregg,
On 31.07.2010 22:11, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello Rainer,
I am +1 for this, as a matter of fact I lobbied for this 10 months ago.
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=125421199606305w=2
If it is going to be done however, please do it completely. Attached is
the rest of what is
Hi Joe,
On 02.08.2010 15:03, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Aug 2 13:03:04 2010
New Revision: 981498
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981498view=rev
Log:
- add description of CVE-2010-2791
Modified:
httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml
On 02.08.2010 15:47, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
--- httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml (original)
+++ httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml Mon Aug 2 13:03:04
2010
@@ -714,6 +714,31 @@ to cross-site
On 05.08.2010 05:45, Ryujiro Shibuya wrote:
Hi,
Can you tell if the OS Keep-alive feature should be expected to work on
forward proxy?
The mod_proxy of latest httpd 2.2 and trunk (2.3) has OS Keep-alive
(Keep-alive connection to origin server) feature, but it seems not working
when we
It seems the forward proxy by default sets Connection: Keep-Alive
although it later closes the connection when it detects
is_address_reusable == 1 in the worker.
Doesn't it make sense to issue Connection close instead?
Since this happens in the code where we have a connection and a request,
The message worker ... already used by another worker seems to not say
what's actually happening.
Situation:
ProxyPass /X http://a.b.c.d/A
ProxyPass /Y http://a.b.c.d/AB
Wouldn't a message
worker http://a.b.c.d/A; will also be used for URL /Y
be more correct?
In addition: we do overwrite
In adition to Rüdiger's reply:
On 05.08.2010 17:31, Paul Fee wrote:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Fee
Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 11:18
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: OS Keep-alive on forward proxy
Rainer Jung wrote:
snip
And yes
On 05.08.2010 13:03, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 11:51
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Changing Connection header use in forward proxy
It seems the forward proxy by default sets Connection: Keep-Alive
although
I created a patch for the mod_proxy docs to clarify what a worker is.
The old part of the docs never talk about workers and then later down
when the 2.2 attributes are described we suddenly start using that
terminology.
I got also confused by the worker sharing (worker already used by
On 05.08.2010 21:30, Eric Covener wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/httpd/trunk/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en#workers
A direct worker is usually configured using any of ProxyPass,
ProxyPassMatch or ProxySet.
I don't know much about Proxy, but can this hammer home a bit more
that these
On 06.08.2010 13:13, Jeff Trawick wrote:
nits:
+ There are two builtin workers, the default forward proxy worker and the
built-in
Done
+ optionally included in adirective module=mod_proxyProxy/directive
+ directive.
How about using container at the end instead of directive?
Minor additions inside.
On 06.08.2010 14:49, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Fee
Sent: Freitag, 6. August 2010 14:44
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Talking about proxy workers
Also, is it possible to setup these three reuse styles for a
forward
On 16.08.2010 15:41, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As many know, one thing I've wanted in httpd's proxy for
http is a sort of pre-request ping option (ala what we
have for ajp) and nothing ever worked out fine, for a variety
of reasons.
Anyway, I've gone back to an idea I had a long while ago
and one
On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body requests...
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c
Modified:
501 - 600 of 1303 matches
Mail list logo
