On 17.08.2010 17:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body
On 17.08.2010 17:22, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body
On 18.08.2010 14:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Today I plan on tagging 2.3.7 as the last alpha release.
We will start with beta with 2.3.8 and push on for GA.
What time of day do you have in mind?
Regards,
Rainer
On 20.08.2010 15:24, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If no: nobody needs to know, or even have a reason to suspect/worry that
there was a buffer overflow that was fixed
ACK, I'm not aware of any overflow issues there, looked safe.
Removed this entry from CHANGES in r987503.
Rainer
On 10.08.2010 20:30, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/10/2010 07:55 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 13:14
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Rephrasing worker
On 23.08.2010 15:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Either today or tomorrow I will be tagging and rolling httpd-2.3.8
Just a head's up.
I played a bit with the new http proxy ping. If it is activated and the
proxy receives a POST request via HTTP/1.1, it always returns HTTP/1.1
100 Continue to the
On 24.08.2010 07:56, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/23/2010 06:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 23.08.2010 15:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Either today or tomorrow I will be tagging and rolling httpd-2.3.8
Just a head's up.
I played a bit with the new http proxy ping. If it is activated
On 25.08.2010 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: justin.erenkra...@gmail.com
Yes, we could fix this by making mod_authz_svn conditional on the new
MMN, but - again, it's about even figuring out that the API is changed
and what to do about it. The root
BZ 49818 informs us, that the language links on
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/
are broken. They work for /2.2/, /trunk/ etc. but not for current.
I can't find any files for /current/ on people.apache.org, so I assume
it is mapped via configuration to the 2.2 docs.
Does anyone know
On 25.08.2010 12:15, Rainer Jung wrote:
BZ 49818 informs us, that the language links on
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/
are broken. They work for /2.2/, /trunk/ etc. but not for current.
I can't find any files for /current/ on people.apache.org, so I assume
it is mapped via
On 25.08.2010 11:19, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Maybe we should put a link to
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/developer/new_api_2_4.html in the
Module Developer Changes section in
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html
Done in r988987.
Rainer
On 25.08.2010 16:23, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for httpd-2.3.8 (alpha) are
available for download, test and fun:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Since this is an alpha release, and since we don't want to
release over the weekend, I'll close the vote Monday,
On 26.08.2010 13:19, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 25.08.2010 16:23, Jim Jagielski wrote:
passed test framework, but had to edit the test framework mods to not
use macros inside of calls to ap_log_error(). My compiler
Date typos noted inline.
On 31.08.2010 15:03, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 31 13:03:58 2010
New Revision: 991180
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=991180view=rev
Log:
Updates for 2.3.8-alpha
Modified:
httpd/site/trunk/docs/download.html
I fixed it. Sorry for the noise.
On 31.08.2010 15:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
Date typos noted inline.
On 31.08.2010 15:03, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 31 13:03:58 2010
New Revision: 991180
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=991180view=rev
Log:
Updates for 2.3.8-alpha
On 31.08.2010 15:44, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com mailto:ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
A 400 does not mean that the backend is not available.
agreed
It just means that
a bad request was sent.
I
On 31.08.2010 17:01, Samuel ROZE wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Apache-Benchmark to stats my applications performances. I
want to create a graph, using GNUPlot and Apache Benchmark.
The -g option create a file that I can load in GNUPlot. It works
very well but requests times are cumulative values:
Is there a better name for mod_authz_host in 2.4?
It currently does Require X with X in
- ip
- host
- env
- all
- method
I'd say the module name gets confusing now, since it implements most of
the easy authz checks. Something like mod_authz_simple,
mod_authz_request, mod_authz_kitchensink,
On 24.09.2010 16:52, Igor Galić wrote:
- Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Is there a better name for mod_authz_host in 2.4?
It currently does Require X with X in
- ip
- host
- env
- all
- method
I'd say the module name gets confusing now, since it implements most
of
the easy
On 24.09.2010 03:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/23/2010 6:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
These two are somewhat different in practice.
When the path to the binary is omitted on the invocation/load, the
shell/loader/whatever finds
* executables only because of the PATH envvar
Correct
*
On 28.09.2010 12:44, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Sep 28 10:44:32 2010
New Revision: 1002110
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002110view=rev
Log:
Fix test suite for 2.0.x:
- Skipping test for PR 46428 when version 2.2.12
(whitespace in proxied URL).
Does that type
On 28.09.2010 13:21, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 28.09.2010 12:44, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Sep 28 10:44:32 2010
New Revision: 1002110
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002110view=rev
Log:
Fix
On 30.09.2010 10:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/29/2010 6:49 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.09.2010 01:17, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
a touch would probably do ... - if not I will face same for
NetWare ...
just checked, and beside some
On 30.09.2010 11:08, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 30.09.2010 10:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/29/2010 6:49 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.09.2010 01:17, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
a touch
On 30.09.2010 18:09, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Sep 30 16:09:05 2010
New Revision: 1003131
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1003131view=rev
Log:
Add detailed information about how to use
session stickyness.
Modified:
Hi Bill,
On 05.10.2010 19:49, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Oct 5 17:49:41 2010
New Revision: 1004734
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004734view=rev
Log:
This really didn't need a backport vote per say, is already built
for other platforms, and for Windows in trunk.
On 07.10.2010 10:45, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available in the
default httpd.conf
Bill: I just verified this by unpacking the MSI. Jeff added building
On 07.10.2010 20:23, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/7/2010 12:37 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 07.10.2010 10:45, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available
On 11.10.2010 20:35, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
... and tagged 0.9. Note 0.9 -util tag already failed on Darwin and we are
holding 2.0 tag for a bundled expat for -util fix. There are four backport
bullets in 2.0 STATUS with two signoffs already, if anyone has eyeballs to
invest between now
Igor,
thanks for checking as well. The Op also posted to the Tomcat dev list
and I applied a change to mod_jk a few minutes ago which at least lets
it compile for 2.0/2.2/2.3.
The culprit was the usual, we do use APLOG_MARK in other places than
just ap_log* and since the macro changed its
On 15.10.2010 18:12, Igor Galić wrote:
- Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
The culprit was the usual, we do use APLOG_MARK in other places than
just ap_log* and since the macro changed its meaning the code broke.
That's expected and well-documented after adding the per-module log
On 14.10.2010 22:51, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts (-src,
x86 binary distribution) will follow in the coming day.
+/-1
[+1] Release httpd 2.2.17 as GA
On 14.10.2010 22:50, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts (-src,
x86 binary distribution) will follow in the coming day.
+/-1
[+1] Release httpd 2.0.64 as GA
On 19.10.2010 22:30, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/19/2010 3:03 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Of course they will still use it. If you want to mandate config
changes, then release it as httpd 3.x. Keeling over a website when
they perform a *minor* version upgrade is foolish. Version numbers
On 18.10.2010 18:39, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:54:27AM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
With a release on the way with a host of good bits, almost 2 years after its
previous release, it seems time that the group might consider the following
options...
[ ] Leave 2.0.x
Subject says it all.
It seems there are unwanted syntax errors in your update, e.g.:
On 23.10.2010 18:02, lgen...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -1987,7 +1987,7 @@ host/context
pLorsqu'un client utilise une connexion persistante, elle comptera
pour une seule requecirc;te pour la directivedirective
-
On 03.11.2010 21:12, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
some of the recent changes in the proxy code introduced some
regressions:
Two proxy-related tests fail:
t/modules/rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 23-24
Not reproducable with prefork here, using Solaris 10, r1030642
On 04.11.2010 00:57, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 03 Nov 2010, at 10:28 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Strange, I have these problems only with prefork, not with event.
But with event I get a segfault in the reslist cleanup code.
Can somebody cross-check this?
This smelled like a pool lifetime
On 04.11.2010 08:36, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/04/2010 01:34 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.11.2010 00:57, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 03 Nov 2010, at 10:28 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Strange, I have these problems only with prefork, not with event.
But with event I get a segfault in the reslist
On 05.11.2010 15:29, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Freitag, 5. November 2010 15:10
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: svn commit: r1031551 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy_connect.c
any concern that these
Interesting stuff. I patched trunk and ran the test suite (using OpenSSL
0.9.8o).
All tests pass for MPMs prefork, worker,event on Solaris 10 (but maybe
you knew that already).
I didn't really check the intended functionality though.
Compilation showed two trivial warnings:
On 05.11.2010 19:07, Bertrand Mansion wrote:
Le 5 nov. 2010 à 16:21, Dan Poirier a écrit :
On Thu. 2010-11-04 at 06:39 PM EDT, Stefan Fritschs...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 November 2010, Dan Poirier wrote:
Before we invent yet another expression language, should we
consider using
On 06.11.2010 15:37, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/05/2010 09:21 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Nov 5 20:21:09 2010
New Revision: 1031776
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1031776view=rev
Log:
PR49823: Make the hardcoded default for AllowOverride match the default
On 06.11.2010 12:03, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 04 November 2010, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, the latest round of fixes seems to have fixed all my
problems.
Oops. Minus the remaining
On 07.11.2010 20:36, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Resending w/ GPG sig. Need at least a few sigs before I can
TR httpd 2.3.9-alpha!
Done. Isn't it for the moment enough that you signed it with your
already trusted key? Only when 1024 effectvely becomes breakable this
wouldn't be valid any longer.
On 08.11.2010 01:35, Jeff Trawick wrote:
With the Error directive:
IfModule !mod_include.c
Error mod_foo requires mod_include! Use the LoadModule directive to
load mod_include.
/IfModule
$ ./httpd -t
Syntax error on line 486 of /home/trawick/inst/23/conf/httpd.conf:
mod_foo requires
On 26.11.2010 09:30, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
While you commit win3.diff, it seems mod_disk_cache was changed to
mod_cache_disk and I remember seeing mention of it. The patch attached
is some clean ups needed for it.
I committed the mod_cache_disk Windows build fixes in r1039295.
Thanks!
Rainer
On 29.11.2010 13:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone opposed if I declare 2.3.9 DOA and TR 2.3.10?
+1 (not opposed)
Rainer
On 16.12.2010 13:51, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha.
I expect that this will be the last alpha release, allowing
us to push on with Beta and
On 21.12.2010 00:43, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha.
-1 on httpd-2.3.10-deps. pcre is missing,
On 21.12.2010 19:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As such, I'm guessing I can close the vote with at least
3 (binding) +1 votes.
Isn't it 4? You, Eric, Stefan and me? I know I'm not listed in the file
but was added to the PMC in October. I just notified Bill about being
missing from the files/ldap.
On 21.12.2010 19:26, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/21/2010 12:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just notified Bill about being missing from the files/ldap.
This is now fixed, sorry Rainer!
No prob, thanks for fixing!
Regards,
Rainer
Hi,
I get a crash on Solaris Sparc during startup in the test suite after
the proxy refactoring. Since it is a Bus error I wildly guess the root
cause is an alignment issue in the shared memory. Sparc ist sensible to
that and the only other Bus error or httpd I remember was wrong
alignment
On 17.01.2011 08:23, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/15/2011 05:01 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:30:01PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
My current migration of mod_proxy away from the scoreboard
and to slotmem is done. All that remains is some final
testing.
This will serve as
It looks like a confusion between array and table:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0xff032198 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.1
(gdb) bt full
#0 0xff032198 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#1 0xff3301ec in apr_array_pstrcat (p=0x5f0730,
Hi,
I wrote a small patch fixing an alignment issue for mod_slotmem:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/mod_slotmem_shm_alignment.patch
The problem is: mod_slotmem uses a header for meta data before the
actual data slots. The addresses used for the data slots are offset by
the size of
I think slotmem is only a dependency for mod_proxy_balancer, not
mod_proxy itself, so it seems safe (and more correct) to move the
aszPred entry from mod_proxy.c to mod_proxy_balancer.c:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/mod_proxy-slotmem-order.patch
OK?
On 17.01.2011 15:45, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I get a crash on Solaris Sparc during startup in the test suite after
the proxy refactoring. Since it is a Bus error I wildly guess the root
cause is an alignment issue in the shared memory. Sparc ist sensible to
that and the only other Bus error
I did a broken build using a SHELL_PATH that was not available on the
build platform. The test suite tried to log
exec of 'echo pass' failed
in test number 16 of t/modules/include.t (line 261). This produced a
crash. It seems the crash will happen every time and exec include fails.
The
Hi,
after yesterdays various small fixes the test suite for trunk again runs
flawlessly for me, no failures, no cores. Tested on Solaris 8+10 Sparc,
RedHat 5 64 Bits and SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 32 Bits using r1060283.
I checked against apr trunk (r1060249) and apr 1.4.2/apu 1.3.10, using
On 20.01.2011 12:01, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
mod_define's capability to define variables in the config is a really
nice to have feature and I have intended to integrate the module it into
trunk. But I have now noticed that core's environment interpolation of
${xxx} is done before mod_define
On 20.01.2011 16:02, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Nick Gearls wrote:
Using the $ character can interact with core interpolation, but also
with, for instance, mod_macro.
I strongly recommend to let mod_define's ability to replace the special
characters.
Moreover, mod_define is
On 01.02.2011 23:17, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Any httpd people coming to FOSDEM in Brussels, Belgium this weekend?
If so Saterday or Sunday?
I hope to go on Saterday... But need to clear something first :(
Currently I plan to be there Saturday and Sunday.
Regards,
Rainer
On 01.03.2011 18:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The Apache httpd 2.3.11-beta test tarballs are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.11-beta.
This is our first Beta release; Based on the feedback and result
from this Beta, the hope is to
There is
APR_HOOK_LINK(request_status)
in mod_proxy.c. The request_status hook is an optional hook and I have
the impression that this macro should only be used for non-optional hooks?
The macro publishes the apr_array_header_t for the hook, but optional
hooks don't use those. They use
On 26.04.2011 21:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:00 PM,s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sun Jan 9 23:00:33 2011
New Revision: 1057048
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1057048view=rev
Log:
mod_status: Don't show slots which are disabled by MaxClients as open.
On 03.05.2011 22:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/3/2011 3:17 PM, field...@apache.org wrote:
-Not sure, whether mime.types is actually CTR.
All documentation is CTR, whether it lives in docs/manual/*.xml, docs/conf/*
server/*.c or include/*.h.
If the change doesn't result in
On 07.05.2011 11:57, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/7/2011 12:20 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/06/2011 03:14 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri May 6 13:14:27 2011
New Revision: 1100200
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1100200view=rev
Log:
Merge r820760,
On 08.05.2011 09:24, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
is generated from unix as a test,
On 10.05.2011 20:57, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 10, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 14:30, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once Jeff applies his hook-probes patch, I'll be doing the
TR within the next few hours.
On May 9, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan on doing
On 10.05.2011 22:03, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 20:57, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 10, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 14:30, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once Jeff applies his hook-probes patch, I'll be doing the
TR within the next few hours.
On May 9, 2011, at 3:18 PM
On 10.05.2011 22:36, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 22:03, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 20:57, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 10, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 14:30, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once Jeff applies his hook-probes patch, I'll be doing the
TR within the next
On 10.05.2011 14:30, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once Jeff applies his hook-probes patch, I'll be doing the
TR within the next few hours.
On May 9, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan on doing a TR tomorrow...
The crash I reported is fixed now in apr-util. It was a missing backport
from
On 11.05.2011 14:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
release in the near future.
+1 to
On 14.05.2011 12:54, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
...
and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right?
Correct. That's why I voted +1.
Rainer
Some of you might have noticed, that the tests run by the test suite are
no longer executed in sorted (alphabetical) order.
AFAIKS this is due to some changes in Apache::TestSort which happened
during the refactoring related to SMOKE tests in January.
The tests are now by default executed in
I noticed, that the SMOKE change in 1.36 also introduced a new sorting
behaviour. In the change the test suite was running by default using the
repeat order, that means the tests were ordered alpabetically.
Now the default order is random.
Furthermore the -order=rotate (A B C A B C) is gone, and
On 20.05.2011 19:17, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 -win32-src.zip and the
win32-x86 binary distribution will follow shortly, in the next 1.5 hrs.
This will be a 24 hour
The filter test t/modules/filter.t fails, because mod_case_filter must
be enabled using CaseFilter On in t/conf/extra.conf.in.
Unfortunately that directive is only per server. Since the module is
shipped with httpd (as experimental) the only quick fix is adding
another vhost in the test config
On 21.05.2011 16:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
The filter test t/modules/filter.t fails, because mod_case_filter must
be enabled using CaseFilter On in t/conf/extra.conf.in.
Unfortunately that directive is only per server. Since the module is
shipped with httpd (as experimental) the only quick fix
On 21.05.2011 21:20, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/21/2011 9:18 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Please include key 7F7214A7 (Bill) in KEYS file at
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS.
Hmmm, which part of this was confusing? I had not heard any
concerns, previously;
Sorry, the confusion
On 22.05.2011 09:40, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 22 May 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
mod_charset_lite:
Remove DebugLevel option in favour of per-module loglevel
cool; more blank space on my whiteboard :)
I only noticed that config option yesterday. Are there any other
modules left
On 21.05.2011 21:41, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.05.2011 16:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
mod_filter does not get the response output headers, if the request is
handled by a CGI. The headers are in err_headers_out, but not in
headers_out. Thus any attempt to match via resp=... must fail. But
that's
Hi Fred,
On 26.05.2011 02:15, Fred Moyer wrote:
+1
Do you have commit privileges on Apache-Test?
Surprise, yes :)
Committed as r1127812.
Regards,
Rainer
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I noticed, that the SMOKE change in 1.36 also introduced
On 24.05.2011 10:23, Issac Goldstand wrote:
A feature that I've kinda wanted for a long time has been the ability to
alias and/or extend existing virtualhosts. Previously, this was just a
minor pain that usually just came up when setting up a website with dual
http and https. It was a bit
On 26.05.2011 11:10, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I just upgraded a machine from 2.2.8 to 2.2.19 and suddenly Apache
wouldn't let me run non-SSL vhosts on port 443. A snippet like below:
VirtualHost a.b.c.d:443
DocumentRoot /home/foo/httpdocs
ServerName foo
Directory /home/foo/httpdocs/
allow
On 18.06.2011 14:44, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/17/2011 6:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we ready for the next beta release???
And Maybe Even The Next Release being GA??
2.3.13 soon, I'll fix the mod_ldap load ordering quirk on Sunday
and
On 22.06.2011 22:39, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 16 June 2011, Brian McCallister wrote:
My personal use cases for mod_lua are not content generation
oriented, but you should be able to do content generation with it.
I suspect that if you are doing serious apps then you will get
more
On 28.06.2011 19:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The candidate tarballs for 2.3.13 are now available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.13-beta, with
a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
release in the near future.
Hi everyone,
a couple of modules have additional external dependencies:
mod_deflate: zlib
mod_lua: lua
mod_serf: serf
mod_socache_dc: distcache
At the moment, the compiled modules do not contain any RPATH/RUNPATH
info except when the libraries themselves are installed as libtool
libraries, i.e.
On 04.07.2011 16:55, Steffen wrote:
Can some tell me how now to configure SSLSessionCache: 'shm'
In the shipped ssl.conf the following line is there:
SSLSessionCacheshmcb:c:/Apache23/logs/ssl_scache(512000)
But that does not work, get the error:
SSLSessionCache: 'shm' session
When testing 2.3.13 I built mod_privileges. I notices that I couldn't
load it if the process was run by a non root user.
Platform was Solaris 10, and the problem was, that the module wants to
add proc_setid to PRIV_PERMITTED. Of course the module needs this
privilege to work and a normal user
Good morning Igor :)
On 05.07.2011 03:09, Igor Galić wrote:
When trying to compile httpd with --enable-mods-shared=reallyall
configure will currently abort on my system because it doesn't
find distcache.
Yup, sorry, used AC_MSG_ERROR instead of AC_MSG_WARN for failure message
during
Hi Igor,
On 05.07.2011 03:00, Igor Galić wrote:
I'm not sure if it's this change that breaks the build
or if it was always broken but:
It broke it, but ...
/opt/bw/share/apr/build/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -pthread
-mtune=native -march=native -O3 -g -Wl,--as-needed
Hi Joe,
On 05.07.2011 09:46, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi everyone,
a couple of modules have additional external dependencies:
mod_deflate: zlib
mod_lua: lua
mod_serf: serf
mod_socache_dc: distcache
At the moment, the compiled modules
I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD
flags. Putting the -R ... into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy,
because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given
directory. The real problematic cases are only mod_lua and in rare
circumstances (you want to
On 05.07.2011 23:21, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
even though it means that reallyall will yield different
results on different systems
That was the point of reallyall. Build everything that is possible
with the installed dependencies. It wouldn't be
On 07.07.2011 18:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Only presently available options are available as choices to end this
now unproductive discussion [any heretofore unseen complete abstration
of ldap cannot be considered with no patches offered]. This vote is
limited to the scope of the httpd
On 12.07.2011 00:35, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 11 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/10/2011 5:34 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Especially r1142938 needs checking, I think I may have accidentally
reverted some bits from that when resolving some conflicts.
I can check and reapply
601 - 700 of 1303 matches
Mail list logo
