This has been itching me for awhile... I don't like loosing
%c whenever mod_ssl is in the mix. This is basically a
feature (yes, I said it, a feature) from 2.0 that makes sense
in 1.3. The other logable items would be nice as
well (%C) but this is core, I think.
The other cruft is simply to put
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This has been itching me for awhile... I don't like loosing
%c whenever mod_ssl is in the mix. This is basically a
feature (yes, I said it, a feature)
You may be on shaky ground there, Jim. At the hackathon, I suggested an
interesting feature for 1.3 to one of those
Jeff Trawick wrote:
You may be on shaky ground there, Jim. At the hackathon, I suggested an
interesting feature for 1.3 to one of those disenfranchised 1.3 developers* and
was asked Why do you want to mess with 1.3? :) From our discussion, he
clearly was ready for 1.3 to fade away as
+1 for 1.3 - we made this change already for 2.0 when we encountered
the problem (as we ship mod_ssl in 2.0, but not in 1.3).
I found it interesting that you retained %c - I presume this means that
%c continues to work until mod_ssl replaces it's meaning?
Bill
At 02:16 PM 11/20/2003, you wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+1 for 1.3 - we made this change already for 2.0 when we encountered
the problem (as we ship mod_ssl in 2.0, but not in 1.3).
I found it interesting that you retained %c - I presume this means that
%c continues to work until mod_ssl replaces it's meaning?
