On 9/22/21 4:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/21 3:49 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>> Ruediger Pluem writes:
>>
>>> Does the attached patch solve your issue?
>>
>> It does appear to solve the problem with missing errors, thanks!
>>
>> I haven't checked that in detail, but I think there
On 9/22/21 3:49 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem writes:
>
>> Does the attached patch solve your issue?
>
> It does appear to solve the problem with missing errors, thanks!
>
> I haven't checked that in detail, but I think there might be a discrepancy
> in how `err` is handled in
Ruediger Pluem writes:
> Does the attached patch solve your issue?
It does appear to solve the problem with missing errors, thanks!
I haven't checked that in detail, but I think there might be a discrepancy
in how `err` is handled in the patch and for example when calling the
Does the attached patch solve your issue?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 9/20/21 8:01 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that I have stumbled across a significant regression in httpd 2.4.49
> where mod_dav has been changed in a way that makes it ignore the errors
> returned by a versioning
Hi,
I think that I have stumbled across a significant regression in httpd 2.4.49
where mod_dav has been changed in a way that makes it ignore the errors
returned by a versioning provider during REPORT requests.
I haven't checked that in detail, but I think that r1892513 [1] is the change
that is
