Jeff Trawick wrote:
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:39:43AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
It applies and builds cleanly for me with HEAD of APACHE_2_0_BRANCH
but I have not had time to test as of yet. Once I can do so, I'll
add a vote to the STATUS file. If you do try it out, post
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:39:43AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
It applies and builds cleanly for me with HEAD of APACHE_2_0_BRANCH but I
have not had time to test as of yet. Once I can do so, I'll add a vote to
the STATUS file. If you do try it out, post your results ;)
Tested on linux
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:39:43AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
It applies and builds cleanly for me with HEAD of APACHE_2_0_BRANCH but I
have not had time to test as of yet. Once I can do so, I'll add a vote to
the STATUS file. If you do try it out, post your results ;)
Paul Querna wrote:
It is difficult to get users to install httpd 2.1, so I would like to
see the exception hooks added to the 2.0 branch. mod_backtrace is very
helpful for catching problems under high load and other situations where
running under GDB is not feasible.
A patch for adding
Exception hooks are awesome. Quite possibly the best thing since sliced
bread for module developers!
It is difficult to get users to install httpd 2.1, so I would like to
see the exception hooks added to the 2.0 branch. mod_backtrace is very
helpful for catching problems under high load and
Paul Querna wrote:
Exception hooks are awesome. Quite possibly the best thing since sliced
bread for module developers!
No, I didn't pay Paul to say that :)
It is difficult to get users to install httpd 2.1, so I would like to
see the exception hooks added to the 2.0 branch. mod_backtrace is
