Re: Any 1.3.30 tarball feeback??

2004-04-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:33 PM 4/12/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: Any comments on the 1.3.30 release candidate tarball? The mod_rewrite.dsw was patched to find the ws2_32.lib required when we modified rewrite. Unfortunately, the .mak file was not updated at the same time. IDE builds (what I tested a week ago) work

Re: Any 1.3.30 tarball feeback??

2004-04-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmmm... I feel that this is safe... If you commit I'll reTAG and reroll. PS: The real reason I don't think we should toss the tag is that this only affect Win people, a small minority in the 1.3 world. So the diffs between the current tarball (should it leak) and this one would be

Re: Any 1.3.30 tarball feeback??

2004-04-12 Thread Brad Nicholes
If you are going to retag, can you also include the htdocs/manual/netware.html patch (r1.9) that I committed last week. This doc change describes the new Netware makefiles that made it into 1.3.30, but the doc didn't. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading