On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:15:11PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
In particular, I don't think our main
page or download page is currently clear enough about the status of
1.3 development. I think we should say something like:
The Apache HTTP Server version 1.3 is not recommended and is not
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see why we care, either way.
Could you clarify what we aren't caring about, since your answer was
a bit ambiguous? (Abandon or not, message our users or not, etc)
On Oct 3, 2007, at 8:30 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see why we care, either way.
Could you clarify what we aren't caring about, since your answer was
a bit ambiguous? (Abandon or not, message our users or not, etc)
Why do we need to announce anything?
On 10/3/07, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care what the uptake graph says. I don't care what people
outside this project mailing list think, period, about this project.
And if five years from now there are three or more Apache committers
that want to release 1.3.x, then no
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 10/3/07, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care what the uptake graph says. I don't care what people
outside this project mailing list think, period, about this project.
And if five years from now there are three or more
Joshua Slive wrote:
We have better things to do. Let's do those things and stop worrying
about other people's perceptions.
I agree, with a caveat. I think that we are doing a disservice to our
users if we don't communicate to them the attitude of the people on
this mailing list towards 1.3.
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see why we care, either way.
I don't care if committers continue to maintain 1.3 longer than any
statement we make.
A public statement is about setting expectations of our users.
We all know that 1.3 is dead as a doornail at this point, but many of
our users do
Paul Querna wrote:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
Actually that statement is too narrow; What if we publish a manifesto such
as this?
Apache httpd 1.3 to be retired at it's 10th anniversary
The Apache
very nice... do include the last paragraph :)
On 10/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
Actually that statement is too narrow; What if
I don't see why we care, either way.
Roy
Apart from the fact that you have it's several times when you mean
its, +1
--
Rich Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
