mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
allow incompatible changes.
Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if
backports could be done quicker for some time until we
On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
allow incompatible changes.
Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if
backports could
+1... this thread is sufficient for voting :)
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and
On 06/07/2013 07:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
+1... this thread is sufficient for voting :)
+1 in that case! :)
With regards,
Daniel
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org
mailto:fua...@apache.org wrote:
On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please let
me know your objections if there are any.
+1
