[Let's continue the discussion privately from now on as it's becoming
less relevant for the httpd project...]
On 2/2/07, Arnold Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
You do not need a secret, but the users who may changed are specified.
In our setup user 'www-data', which has no privileges
This is similar to the route I was pondering. But I believe it would add a
greater degree of security to have the kernel module read a config file in the
/etc directory which limits which uid's may switch to precisely which uid's.
That way the parent process can fork a child and setuid for
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:15:23 +0100, Arnold Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We run a shared hosting company as well and taken upon the route to
patch the linux kernel to allow switching of user of the current
process. An apache module allows you to switch the process based on the
Comments below.
On 1/31/07, Arnold Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can't answer all your questions, since I'm not the developer of the
patch and module. I've forwarded this message to Rik Arends. But let me
answer the onces I can.
We've looked at running PHP as CGI, but we've noticed a
Hi,
Comments below.
Arnold
Ivan Ristic schreef:
Comments below.
On 1/31/07, Arnold Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can't answer all your questions, since I'm not the developer of the
patch and module. I've forwarded this message to Rik Arends. But let me
answer the onces I can.
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:31:40 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have gotten the impression this may be a sore subject for the list
based on searching through the archives, but I do not intend to work
anyone up. I have been trying to find a solution
Hi,
We run a shared hosting company as well and taken upon the route to
patch the linux kernel to allow switching of user of the current
process. An apache module allows you to switch the process based on the
virtual host. Our current module also implements mass virtual hosting,
but any open
Hi Arnold,
You have obviously spent a great deal of time implementing your
solution. Personally I have always felt complete separation (e.g. what
is done with FastCGI) is a more robust approach. But I don't think the
issues surrounding the choices have been discussed enough in the
public. If you
Hi,
I can't answer all your questions, since I'm not the developer of the
patch and module. I've forwarded this message to Rik Arends. But let me
answer the onces I can.
We've looked at running PHP as CGI, but we've noticed a performance drop
compared to running PHP as module, effectively
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:31:40 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have gotten the impression this may be a sore subject for the list
based on searching through the archives, but I do not intend to work
anyone up. I have been trying to find a solution to the problem of
shared hosting with a
I have gotten the impression this may be a sore subject for the list based on
searching through the archives, but I do not intend to work anyone up. I have
been trying to find a solution to the problem of shared hosting with a dynamic
language such as PHP. I found the old perchild MPM and it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If there is, do the developers need help with it? I can write C and I am
willing to help out with this. If there is not, Would anyone from the Apache
team be interested in working with me so I may write such functionality,
maybe for a future version of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If there is, do the developers need help with it? I can write C and I am
willing to help out with this. If there is not, Would anyone from the
Apache team be interested in working with me so I may write such
functionality, maybe for
13 matches
Mail list logo
