At 10:59 PM 9/28/2004, you wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:00:12 -0600, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting the download page:
Official Patches
When we have patches to a minor bug or two, or features which we
haven't yet included in a new release, we will put them in the patches
Since this patch was the last of three fixes for util_ldap and didn't
make it into 2.0.52 because of lack of votes and since it fixes a
segfault in util_ldap, now that it has the required votes, I would
suggest we backport the fix and post the patch in /dist/httpd/patches.
Any objections?
At 04:59 PM 9/28/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Since this patch was the last of three fixes for util_ldap and didn't
make it into 2.0.52 because of lack of votes and since it fixes a
segfault in util_ldap, now that it has the required votes, I would
suggest we backport the fix and post the patch
I wouldn't consider posting the patch if there was going to be
another release in a week and a half, but that usually isn't the case
and a patch for an experimental module usually isn't reason enough to
roll another release. Past history shows that it usually takes a
serious vulnerability to
At 06:12 PM 9/28/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I wouldn't consider posting the patch if there was going to be
another release in a week and a half, but that usually isn't the case
and a patch for an experimental module usually isn't reason enough to
roll another release. Past history shows that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:31:47 PM
At 06:12 PM 9/28/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I wouldn't consider posting the patch if there was going to be
another release in a week and a half, but that usually isn't the
case
and a patch for an experimental module usually isn't
--On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 6:31 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the same time, there is ***massive*** progress on mod_cache! If the
mod_cache folks think we are ready to roll (and they are getting close)
then another release for all these 'experimental'
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:00:12 -0600, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:31:47 PM
At 06:12 PM 9/28/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I wouldn't consider posting the patch if there was going to be
another release in a week and a half, but that
