On 01/08/2013 11:40 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Tue Jan  8 22:40:29 2013
> New Revision: 1430590
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430590&view=rev
> Log:
> BalancerInherit proposal
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1430590&r1=1430589&r2=1430590&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Jan  8 22:40:29 2013
> @@ -176,6 +176,20 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>       2.4.x patch: trunk patch works + CHANGES to be added
>       +1: jailletc36, jim
>  
> +   * mod_proxy: Allow balancers to be server-specific, as they should have
> +     been. Inheritance causes too many behind-the-scene interactions
> +     to be reliable in a dynamic environ. We maintain the old-default
> +     of inheritance.
> +     trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1387603
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1388029
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420124
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1421288
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1421912
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1422943
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1422980
> +                  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1430575
> +     2.4.x patch: 
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/proxypassinherit2.patch
> +     +1: jim
>  
>  
>  A list of further possible backports can be found at:
> 
> 
Did you mean
http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/proxypassinherit.patch (without
the '2') ?

With regards,
Daniel.

Reply via email to