Thanks Stefan.
The "issue" now is that we still have mod_h2.so only (and h2_module as
identifier, based on the module being declared in file mod_h2.c), I'm
not sure having both names helps finally...
Maybe one would expect using "LoadModule http2_module
modules/mod_http2.so" when using
Done in r1704826, merged into branches/2.4.17-protocols-http2.
> Am 23.09.2015 um 02:02 schrieb William A Rowe Jr :
>
> +1 - mostly because --enable-http2 is easier to grok than --enable-h2, not
> because I object to the old name :)
>
> On Sep 22, 2015 12:39, "Greg Stein"
IMO, we should keep it where it is (modules/http2 to complement
modules/http) but change the configure to --enable-http2 (but
also allow --enable-h2 as well)... After all, we enable http/1
via --enable-http
+1
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>
> http2 is more descriptive for the module's purpose, even if the name is
> mod_h2. I like it where it is.
> - 0
>
> On 9/22/2015 5:08 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> +0.5
>>
>> h2 ftw! (but there is also a mod_mime in the
That quickly went the wrong way... ;-)
> Am 22.09.2015 um 19:39 schrieb Greg Stein :
>
> Yeah... if anything, rename to mod_http2.
>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>> http2 is more descriptive for the module's purpose, even if the name
http2 is more descriptive for the module's purpose, even if the name is
mod_h2. I like it where it is.
- 0
On 9/22/2015 5:08 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
+0.5
h2 ftw! (but there is also a mod_mime in the http dir, so I do not really feel
strongly about this)
Am 22.09.2015 um 14:05 schrieb
Yeah... if anything, rename to mod_http2.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
> http2 is more descriptive for the module's purpose, even if the name is
> mod_h2. I like it where it is.
> - 0
>
>
> On 9/22/2015 5:08 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
>> +0.5
>>
>> h2
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> IMO, we should keep it where it is (modules/http2 to complement
> modules/http) but change the configure to --enable-http2 (but
> also allow --enable-h2 as well)... After all, we enable http/1
> via --enable-http
I'm fine
+1 - mostly because --enable-http2 is easier to grok than --enable-h2, not
because I object to the old name :)
On Sep 22, 2015 12:39, "Greg Stein" wrote:
> Yeah... if anything, rename to mod_http2.
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>
>>
I'm confused about the sources being in modules/http2 and the module
being mod_h2 (configured with --enable-h2, ...), it seems to be the
only one like this.
+1 for me...
+0.5
h2 ftw! (but there is also a mod_mime in the http dir, so I do not really feel
strongly about this)
> Am 22.09.2015 um 14:05 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> I'm confused about the sources being in modules/http2 and the module
> being mod_h2 (configured with --enable-h2,
11 matches
Mail list logo