Re: 'Date' and 'Timestamp' types in SQL queries

There was some changes in how .NET interoperate w/ Java on binary level. No changes were made to cache or query logic. I performed a smoke test in Java and observed that Date field was correctly mapped to H2 date and then vice versa. Probably this is a kind of configuration problem. Vladimir.

Re: MyBatis-Ignite integration release

Thanks Roman, this is awesome news! Do you know what is the process at MyBatis to move from beta into a final GA release? D. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Roman Shtykh wrote: > Dear community, > > I would like to share the news about MyBatis-Ignite integration release,

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2632) "Connection to Ignite Node is not established" is appear unproperly in corner case

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-2632: -- Summary: "Connection to Ignite Node is not established" is appear unproperly in corner case Key: IGNITE-2632 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2632

Compiling Ignite against different JDKs

Hello all, I am working on a ticket that is not very difficult, if you are good with Idea, Java, Maven etc. I have been a developer in various languages but new to Java ;). I had JDK8 installed and I introduced some changes to the code base that cause it to not compile (apparently) against

Re: 'Date' and 'Timestamp' types in SQL queries

Ok, It seems like I have found what was causing the issue. In our apache.ignite.internal.processors.queryh.h2.IgniteH2Indexing.DBTypeEnum: /** * Initialize map of DB types. */ static { map.put(int.class, INT); map.put(Integer.class, INT); map.put(boolean.class, BOOL); map.put(Boolean.class,

Re: 'Date' and 'Timestamp' types in SQL queries

Sorry, I meant In our Binary marshaler we use *java.util.Date.* Best Regards, Igor On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Igor Sapego wrote: > Ok, It seems like I have found what was causing the issue. > > In our >

Re: 'Date' and 'Timestamp' types in SQL queries

I guess we should switch to java.sql.Date in BinaryMarshaller then. Best Regards, Igor On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Sergi Vladykin wrote: > This is because there is no java.util.Date in SQL, we have to either treat > it as BLOB or as native SQL type Timestamp.

Re: 'Date' and 'Timestamp' types in SQL queries

I do not think we are going to change BinaryMarshaller that way. java.util.Date is widely used and accepted data type. To the contrast, java.sql.Date is very specific data type usually used somewhere near JDBC layer. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Igor Sapego wrote: > I

Re: Compiling Ignite against different JDKs

Hi, Most likely you have 'java8' profile enabled. Go to Maven Projects->Profiles and remove the corresponding checkbox. -Val On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Dood@ODDO wrote: > Hello all, > > I am working on a ticket that is not very difficult, if you are good with >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2625) .NET: Incorrect field offset calculation in BinaryReader

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2625: -- Summary: .NET: Incorrect field offset calculation in BinaryReader Key: IGNITE-2625 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2625 Project: Ignite

Re: MyBatis-Ignite integration release

Dmitriy, Let's see if we have some feedback from users (that is mostly the intention I share here too). After that I'll call for a vote among MyBatis devs and they will help with the release. -Roman On Thursday, February 11, 2016 5:39 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2627) ODBC: OdbcNioParser is implemented incorrectly.

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2627: --- Summary: ODBC: OdbcNioParser is implemented incorrectly. Key: IGNITE-2627 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2627 Project: Ignite Issue

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2628) ODBC: Add multi-threaded tests.

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2628: --- Summary: ODBC: Add multi-threaded tests. Key: IGNITE-2628 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2628 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2629) ODBC: Added GridNioAsyncNotifyFilter and GridConnectionBytesVerifyFilter to NIO server.

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2629: --- Summary: ODBC: Added GridNioAsyncNotifyFilter and GridConnectionBytesVerifyFilter to NIO server. Key: IGNITE-2629 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2629

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2630) Make 'updateCntr' available through CacheInterceptor API

Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-2630: Summary: Make 'updateCntr' available through CacheInterceptor API Key: IGNITE-2630 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2630 Project: Ignite

Re: 'Date' and 'Timestamp' types in SQL queries

This is because there is no java.util.Date in SQL, we have to either treat it as BLOB or as native SQL type Timestamp. We've chosen the latter approach. Sergi 2016-02-11 18:24 GMT+03:00 Igor Sapego : > Sorry, I meant In our Binary marshaler we use *java.util.Date.* > >

[GitHub] ignite pull request: Ignite 2430

GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/475 Ignite 2430 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/dkarachentsev/ignite ignite-2430 Alternatively you can review and apply

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2631) Add ability to view java- and xml- files from 'Project structure'

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-2631: -- Summary: Add ability to view java- and xml- files from 'Project structure' Key: IGNITE-2631 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2631

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2555 fix

Github user ruskim closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/468 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2626) Binary marshaller: sort fields alphabetically

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2626: -- Summary: Binary marshaller: sort fields alphabetically Key: IGNITE-2626 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2626 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: Transformers in SCAN queries

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Andrey Gura wrote: > Despite of trasformer makes little sense for the SqlFieldsQuery I don't see > any reason for throwing of UnsupportedOperationException. > I think it is stange limitation from user standpoint. > I think either supporting