March 2024 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the January 2024 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2024-03.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report tomorrow Tuesday EOD. Regards Marcel

Re: January 2024 report: draft for review

> Re "Migration to Jakarta APIs saw some progress with good collaboration > between different Apache project teams. However, the migration requires > many changes while the team also wants to keep modules compatible with > the current version of the Servlet API." - does this refer to the > ongoing

January 2024 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the January 2024 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2024-01.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report on Monday next week. Regards Marcel

Re: VOTE: Migrate from Subversion to Git

On 11.10.23, 20:00, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > [..] I propose to migrate Jackrabbit (Classic) from SVN to Git [..] +1, migrate Jackrabbit to Git Regards Marcel

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4972) Remove RMI support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17767878#comment-17767878 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-4972: --- +1 > Remove RMI supp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.12

On 05.09.23, 09:13, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.12. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

September 2023 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the September 2023 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2023-09.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report by the end of this week. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16

On 14.07.23, 07:39, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.17

On 13.07.23, 21:24, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.17. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: MongoDB 5/6 support

Hi Alexander On 07.07.23, 11:12, "Alexander Lüders" wrote: > we are using JackrabbitOak 1.42 that officially supports MongoDB 4.4.x. > Do you have MongoDB 5/6 support on your roadmap? Unfortunately we were > not able to find this information by ourselves on the site below. Automated builds

Re: Require OSGi R7

Hi Konrad On 03.07.23, 13:27, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I would recommend to require at least OSGi R7 for Oak (released in 2018) > and at the same time no longer use the aggregate dependency but rather > the individual chapter dependencies of OSGi separately [3] which are > (from Compendium) >

[jira] [Resolved] (JCRSITE-54) Update standalone-server documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved JCRSITE-54. - Resolution: Fixed Updated in trunk https://svn.apache.org/r1910707 > Update standal

[jira] [Updated] (JCRSITE-54) Update standalone-server documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated JCRSITE-54: Summary: Update standalone-server documentation (was: Update standalon-server

[jira] [Created] (JCRSITE-54) Update standalon-server documentation

Marcel Reutegger created JCRSITE-54: --- Summary: Update standalon-server documentation Key: JCRSITE-54 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-54 Project: Jackrabbit Site Issue

June 2023 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the June 2023 board report is available here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/live/jcr/status/board-report-2023-06.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report by the end of this week. Regards Marcel

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4935) session.exportDocumentView() generates unparsable XML if a JCR Property contains invalid XML character

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17727421#comment-17727421 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-4935: --- [~reschke], what you quoted applies to system view export

Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer

Hi Jorge, On 16.05.23, 20:37, "Jorge Flórez" wrote: > we are planning to update our oak dependencies, from 1.12.0 to 1.50.0 > (or maybe 1.52.0). We are aware that we need to use Java 11 (already > using it) and update our Mongo servers. It seems it will be to version 6 > (not my decision). If I

Updated short url for oak-mongo.js

Hi, Today I noticed the short url for oak-mongo.js [0] was still pointing to SVN [1]. I updated it to now redirect to git [2]. Regards Marcel [0] https://s.apache.org/oak-mongo.js [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-run/src/main/js/oak-mongo.js [2]

New Jackrabbit Committer and PMC member: Rishabh Daim

Hi, Please welcome Rishabh Daim as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer Rishabh committership based on his contributions. I'm happy to announce that he accepted the offer and that all the related administrative work has now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.15

On 04.04.23, 08:48, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.15. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

TAC supporting Berlin Buzzwords

I’m forwarding a message from the ASF Travel Assistance Committee. On 24.03.23, 10:57, "Gavin McDonald" wrote: Hi All, The ASF Travel Assistance Committee is supporting taking up to six (6) people to attend Berlin Buzzwords In June this year. This includes Conference passes, and travel &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.50.0

On 18.03.23, 10:50, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.50.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

March 2023 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the March 2023 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2023-03.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report early next week. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.9

On 07.03.23, 06:53, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.9. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.8

On 05.01.23, 16:50, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.8. > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.8

On 04.01.23, 18:00, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.8. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

On 16.12.22, 20:01, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > @Marcel: Are you still looking into optimizations? No, I’m not. Regards Marcel

December 2022 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the December 2022 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2022-12.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report tomorrow. Regards Marcel

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

Hi, On 11.11.22, 15:11, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > I think it would be worthile to check if the build can be optimised FYI, I also changed the Job configuration to not build PRs in draft state. Regards Marcel

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

On 14.11.22, 16:29, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Can you come up with a PR? See https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/755 Though, I don’t think the build it triggers actually uses the updated Jenkinsfile. Regards Marcel

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

Hi, On 11.11.22, 15:11, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > I think it would be worthile to check if the build can be optimised, > otherwise Oak builds are blocking many execution slots of the Jenkins > ASF instance. I did notice one thing. Our PRs may schedule a build each time commits are pushed to

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

Hi Robert, On 11.11.22, 15:11, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > I was waiting for a small PR of mine in Sling to be built by Jenkins and > I saw that it was not picked for some time. Looking at the executing > jobs I noticed that there were many, different, Oak stages being ran. > > A sample PR check

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.7

On 07.11.22, 06:56, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.7. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.13

On 13.10.22, 11:46, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.13. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-662) JcrPackageRegistry.remove() leaks temp file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated JCRVLT-662: Fix Version/s: 3.6.6 (was: 3.6.4) Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Assigned] (JCRVLT-662) JcrPackageRegistry.remove() leaks temp file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger reassigned JCRVLT-662: --- Assignee: Marcel Reutegger > JcrPackageRegistry.remove() leaks temp f

[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-662) JcrPackageRegistry.remove() leaks temp file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated JCRVLT-662: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Proposed changes in https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Created] (JCRVLT-662) JcrPackageRegistry.remove() leaks temp file

Marcel Reutegger created JCRVLT-662: --- Summary: JcrPackageRegistry.remove() leaks temp file Key: JCRVLT-662 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-662 Project: Jackrabbit FileVault

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.4

On 16.09.22, 11:35, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.4. > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and passes > if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.2

On 16.09.22, 09:35, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Can I reuse the version number 3.6.2 or should the new release candidate be > 3.6.4? I would use 3.6.4 to avoid any confusion. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.2

On 16.09.22, 09:20, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Good catch, missed to update it. > Should I cancel and respin or can we continue (given that the JIRA > release notes are correct)? I'm a bit undecided, which is why I didn't vote -1. I have a slight tendency towards respinning. Release notes are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.2

On 13.09.22, 14:01, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.2. > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and passes > if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. > The vote fails if not

September 2022 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the September 2022 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2022-09.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report tomorrow. Regards Marcel

Re: Removing a version does not remove associated labels

Hi Arun, On 29.08.22, 09:05, "Arun Ram" wrote: > I have checked the classic jackrabbit . Here i dont see the problem. > In classic jackrabbit InternalVersionHistoryImpl[1] removes the > versionLabel before removing the version. > Also regarding ReferentialIntegrityException of removeVersion , it

Re: 180 open PRs on Github

Hi, On 10.08.22, 12:30, "Stefan Seifert" wrote: > this sounds like a job that should be automated - e.g. using the stale > github action. +1 I’m also in favour of automating this task. Some of the PRs just need a nudge, but many can probably be closed because the issue is no longer that

Re: Removing a version does not remove associated labels

Hi Arun, On 25.08.22, 13:20, "Arun Ram" wrote: > We have encountered a behavior of versionStorage and versionLabels which I > think is bug. > > *Current behavior:* > >1. Create a node and make it *versionable* >2. Now create more than two versions (for example two version is *1.0* >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.12

On 08.08.22, 07:58, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.12. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: Bulk load [migration] to oak using RDB Document node store

Hi Selvaraj, On 27.07.22, 10:31, "Selvaraj chennappan" wrote: > We are migrating to Apache jackrabbit oak . > RDB Document node store > Postgres > > oak 1.42.0 > java 8 > > issue : Loading is extremely slow (10x) when compared with Segment node > store . > Could you please suggest any

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

Hi, On 22.07.22, 12:46, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I use this information to quickly check: > > - which is the latest release To me the displayed version is just confusing. Currently it says 1.43-SNAPSHOT. How do I know 1.44.0 is the latest release? Beware, it's a trap! ;) > - whether the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

Hi, On 22.07.22, 12:18, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > The version Is part of the header contained in every page of the site, > so IMHO a release (i.e. version change) requires a republish. The version on those pages never matches the latest release. It's always just the current SNAPSHOT version.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

Hi Konrad, On 21.07.22, 15:30, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Neither the website (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/index.html) > nor the published javadoc > (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/apidocs/) have been updated > unfortunately. I did not make any changes to Oak pages. So I

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4812) Update Jackrabbit trunk to Oak 1.44.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated JCR-4812: -- Description: (was: Merged into 2.20 branch: https://svn.apache.org/r1902741) Merged

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4812) Update Jackrabbit trunk to Oak 1.44.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated JCR-4812: -- Fix Version/s: 2.20.7 Description: Merged into 2.20 branch: https://svn.apache.org/r1902741

[jira] [Resolved] (JCR-4812) Update Jackrabbit trunk to Oak 1.44.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-4812. --- Fix Version/s: 2.21.12 Resolution: Fixed Done in trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1902738

[jira] [Created] (JCR-4812) Update Jackrabbit trunk to Oak 1.44.0

Marcel Reutegger created JCR-4812: - Summary: Update Jackrabbit trunk to Oak 1.44.0 Key: JCR-4812 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4812 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

Hi, The vote passes as follows: +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Julian Reschke +1 Woonsan Ko +1 Angela Schreiber +1 Nitin Gupta Thanks for voting. I’ll push the release out. Regards Marcel

Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.12

On 15.07.22, 07:27, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.12. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release plan

Hi Konrad, On 12.07.22, 18:44, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Although I appreciate a release, I see that this has been done already > now. I would appreciate if you would give the Jackrabbit community a bit > more in advance notice (maybe one week) to allow others to contribute > fixes and also to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

On 12.07.22, 17:16, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release thi

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.44.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/jackrabbit-oak-1.44.0/ The SHA1 checksum of the

Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release plan

Hi, It’s been more than 6 month since the last Oak feature release. I’d like to release 1.44.0 after blocking issues have been resolved. Issues currently open for 1.44.0 are here:

June 2022 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the June 2022 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2022-06.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report tomorrow. Regards Marcel

Re: FileVault support for version storage

Hi, On 27.04.22, 11:17, "Timothée Maret" wrote: > 1. Add support for merging versions into a version history which is > essentially OAK-1402 This is something different. VersionManager.merge() pulls in changes from corresponding nodes in a different workspace through a shared version history.

[jira] [Resolved] (JCRSITE-53) Remove custom privacy page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved JCRSITE-53. - Resolution: Done Done with https://svn.apache.org/r1900141 > Remove custom privacy p

[jira] [Created] (JCRSITE-53) Remove custom privacy page

Marcel Reutegger created JCRSITE-53: --- Summary: Remove custom privacy page Key: JCRSITE-53 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRSITE-53 Project: Jackrabbit Site Issue Type: Task

Re: Enable Matomo Web Analytics

Thanks. I’m OK with enabling web analytics. Regards Marcel On 10.03.22, 17:06, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Sorry, yes here are the missing references: > > [1] - https://privacy.apache.org/faq/committers.html > [2] - >

Re: Enable Matomo Web Analytics

Hi Konrad, This sounds interesting. Could you please add the missing links? Regards Marcel On 08.03.22, 08:48, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Hi, > Recently ASF set up a hosted instance of Matomo providing web analytics > for ASF project’s websites [1]. WDYT about enabling web analytics with >

Re: OAK-9712: blob-cloud-azure instead of segment-azure?

Hi, On 08.03.22, 15:55, "Matt Ryan" wrote: > - Open issues, questions, concerns, etc. in tickets and PRs must be > addressed satisfactorily before code is committed. I agree. To me it seems like changes for OAK-9712 were rushed in. The PR also had failed checks for most of the modules, because

March 2022 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the March 2022 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2022-03.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report on Tuesday. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.0

Hi, On 26.02.22, 18:30, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.6.0. > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and passes > if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. > The vote fails if not

New Jackrabbit Committer: José Andrés Cordero Benítez

Hi, Please welcome José Andrés Cordero Benítez as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer José committership based on his contributions. I'm happy to announce that he accepted the offer and that all the related administrative

New Jackrabbit Committer: José Andrés Cordero Benítez

Hi, Please welcome José Andrés Cordero Benítez as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer José committership based on his contributions. I'm happy to announce that he accepted the offer and that all the related administrative

Re: Javadocs

Hi, On 31.01.22, 16:50, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Can we publish the most recent release again? Apologies, I don't know why that happened. It looks like I was updating the website in November 2021 with some minor corrections and this also wiped Javadoc. I re-generated the site with Javadoc

Re: [jackrabbit-oak] branch upstream-trunk updated: [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration

Hi, On 10.01.22, 09:23, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > Something went wrong at this step of the release. The following commit > updated the project version to 1.43-SNAPSHOT on branch 'upstream-trunk' > instead of 'trunk'. > > Trunk is still on 1.41-SNAPSHOT. Created

Re: [jackrabbit-oak] branch upstream-trunk updated: [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration

Hi Miro, Something went wrong at this step of the release. The following commit updated the project version to 1.43-SNAPSHOT on branch 'upstream-trunk' instead of 'trunk'. Trunk is still on 1.41-SNAPSHOT. Regards Marcel On 06.01.22, 13:00, "miros...@apache.org" wrote: > > This is an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0

On 07.01.22, 13:04, "Miroslav Smiljanic" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.9

On 04.01.22, 11:54, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.16.9. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.8

On 17.12.21, 13:25, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.8. > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and passes > if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. > The vote fails if not enough

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.9

On 07.12.21, 06:21, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.9. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

December 2021 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the December 2021 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2021-12.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report on Monday. Regards Marcel 

Re: garbage collection with azure blob store

Hi, Those lists are indeed a bit confusing. I added AzureDataStore below the DocumentNodeStore. Regards Marcel On 19.11.21, 10:55, "Marco Piovesana" wrote: > in the blob store page > under > the section "Blob Garbage Collection"

Re: garbage collection with azure blob store

Hi, On 18.11.21, 11:18, "Marco Piovesana" wrote: > the documentation states that the blob garbage collection is not > applicable when using a document node store with an azure blob store, > while it is applicable when using a segment node store with an azure > blob store. So what happens to the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22

On 15.11.21, 14:44, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.2.2

On 14.10.21, 15:32, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault > Package Maven Plugin 1.2.2. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.2.2 Regards Marcel

Re: Permission to start Project Cumulus as a Jackrabbit sub-module

Hi Andrei Sounds like an interesting idea. My suggestion would be to start with as low overhead as possible. The Jackrabbit project has a sandbox in svn: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/sandbox/ Would this work for you as a location to start? Alternatively, we could also request a

September 2021 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the September 2021 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2021-09.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report tomorrow. Regards Marcel

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-551) Set jcr:uuid to value from package when updating node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401499#comment-17401499 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on JCRVLT-551: - Oak uses an index to keep track of references

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

Hi, On 16.07.21, 11:20, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > You can always fall back to Jukka's release auditing guidelines Or better yet, the authoritative source [0]. Regards Marcel [0] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

Hi, On 15.07.21, 18:35, "Angela Schreiber" wrote: > IMHO we should not vote on a release if everyone is requied to manually > alter the check-release.sh in order to verify that the checks are ok. It's unfortunate that GitHub's SVN export is unreliable and the release check script may fail. But

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4706) Improve Jackrabbit Release Checker script to natively support Git clones

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17381917#comment-17381917 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-4706: --- [~kwin], looks good to me. I tested it with the current Oak

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

On 15.07.21, 12:05, "Andrei Dulceanu" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. Checks OK after I did some manual changes to the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Migrate to Git

Hi Konrad, This is great news. Thanks a lot for volunteering and driving this forward. Regards Marcel On 23.06.21, 12:46, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > The repository has been successfully migrated and the patches and PR > were applied. Now the documentation should be up2date. For details refer

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Migrate to Git

Hi Konrad On 18.06.21, 11:01, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I haven't received any feedback on the patches or the PR, I therefore > defer migration for one week. Please have a look at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9440 and the attached patches > and PR Thanks for preparing those

Re: User Feedback

Hi Aaron, On 12.06.21, 18:54, "Aaron Anderson" wrote: > After completing my development there are a few very minor enhancements > for the Elasticsearch plugin that I would like to contribute to the > project. Should I create an issue first or may I directly create a > Github pull request? It's

Re: Patch: Small documentation imrovements

Hi Aravindo, can you please create an OAK issue for component ‘doc’ and attach the patch there? Alternatively, you can also reference a GitHub PR in the issue. Thanks! Regards Marcel On 11.06.21, 20:48, "Aravindo Wingeier" wrote: > I did small improvements to the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8

On 02.06.21, 11:44, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault > Package Maven Plugin 1.1.8. The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours > during business days and passes if a majority of at least three +1 > Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The

June 2021 report: draft for review

Hi, The draft for the June 2021 board report is available here: https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/status/board-report-2021-06.html Please review and let me know if something is missing or incorrect. I will submit the report tomorrow. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Migrate to Git

Hi Konrad, On 19.05.21, 09:24, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I hereby propose to > > 1. migrate the SVN repository at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/ to a Git repository > named "jackrabbit-oak" > 2. migrate GitHub SVN mirror at https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak > to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >