Re: In relation to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9319

This is a long outstanding request, that apache doesn't seem to want to fully support. There's workarounds though. Here's what I've written in the past; Oak doesn't guarantee the count to be accurate, it might be an estimate. You can get the estimate by sorting by jcr:score. Just append order by

Re: Guava version update

Michal, if you need an immediate fix you can use a shaded oak dependency where the guava and luene dependencies are included and shaded, so not to interfere with other dependencies in your project. See https://github.com/tveimo/oak-lucene-shaded Use as buildscript { repositories { maven {

Re: changelog

Can you show some code? There's a real lack of code showing how to do GC without using the default osgi configuration. On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:08, Marco Piovesana wrote: > > We use Oak alone so we handle the garbage collection, we used a specific > contractor for the *MarkSweepGarbageCollector

Re: [GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] larsgrefer opened a new pull request #226: OAK-9082 Remove unnecessary (un)boxing in oak-store-composite

Maybe it would be an idea to have a separate mailing list for the pull-requests? On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 04:24, GitBox wrote: > > > larsgrefer opened a new pull request #226: > URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/226 > > > > > >

Re: Jackrabbit Lucene Upgrade ?

The oak-lucene module exposes an api that is oak specific and doesn't contain any lucene package names, but it uses lucene internally. Shading the lucene jar translates the package names so instead of having names like org.apache.lucene, they are called prefix.org.apache.lucene etc. The oak-lucene

Re: Jackrabbit Lucene Upgrade ?

I understand what you'd like to do, but there's a reason it hasn't happened yet. It was requested many years ago, and it's not easy. On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 21:28, KÖLL Claus wrote: > > Hi ! > > If i understand you right i have not the problem to use 2 different versions > of lucene in the same

Re: Jackrabbit Lucene Upgrade ?

You can have your own shaded version of the lucene 3.6 jars. We're doing just that with the oak-lucene artifact, as we use elasticsearch which is using a much more recent version of lucene in the same project. I can't give exact details on how to set up the maven artifact for the old jackrabbit

Re: getSize() return -1 with oak

There might be a faster way to do it with the new faceting support, but you need lucene indexes, and I'm not sure how to configure it. Someone else might have some advice. On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 17:38, zhouxu wrote: > > Thanks for your reply! The amount of data we need to count is extraordinarily

Re: getSize() return -1 with oak

Oak doesn't guarantee the count to be accurate, it might be an estimate. You can get the estimate by sorting by jcr:score. Just append order by [jcr:score] to your query. To make sure you have a correct count, you really need to iterate over all elements and count yourself. One might not agree

Re: Problem in configuring more than Jackrabbit-oak server for the same data.

You need to use a mongodb backend if you want multiple oak instances accessing the same data. The segmentstore (the default) only allows a single instance. On 22 March 2018 at 00:31, Sudhir Kumar wrote: > Hello All, > > > > Currently I am using Jackrabbit-OAK 1.6.1

Re: Fwd: dump content of segment tar files

wrote: > > Hi, > > Unfortunately there is currently no OOTB tooling apart from oak-run check > followed by a manual roll back to repair a repository. > > What where you doing with oak-run while the disk run full? > > Michael > > > On 30.01.18 11:14, Torgeir Ve

Fwd: dump content of segment tar files

Is there a tool to inspect the content of segment tar files? I've had a case of oak-run corrupting a repository due to the disk going full, and need to see if there's any data for the last 24 hours that i can get back from the segment files remaining. -- -Tor

Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0

Upgrading lucene to version 6 would probably warrant using 2.0, but that's not ready yet for 1.8? On 6 December 2017 at 10:39, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I vote for 1.8. I don't see any big changes that would justify version > 2.0. The modularization (moving code around)

Re: chroot-like content segregation?

Could you implement a JcrDocumentStore which relays to an underlying JCR repository with subpath jailing for this purpose? Catching it at any other level seems to lead to complications and special cases. On 22 September 2017 at 01:13, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: Document indexing design of Oak

"The index definitions nodes have following properties type - It determines the type of index. For e.g. it can be property, lucene, solr etc. Based on the typeIndexUpdate would look for IndexEditor of given type from registered IndexEditorProvider" If I as a casual developer consult the

Re: trying to get more info on IllegalStateException when migrating

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK > > > On 6.2.17 10:10 , Torgeir Veimo wrote: > >> I just added some log statements. It seems that the upgrade process >> appends >> /segmentstore to the path I specify, while the oak directory onl

Re: trying to get more info on IllegalStateException when migrating

ain] *INFO* org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.file.FileStore - builder path: /Users/tor/content/karriere/oak/segmentstore On 6 February 2017 at 18:54, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 6.2.17 9:47 , Torgeir Veimo wrote: > >> That is very odd. The /Users/tor/co

trying to get more info on IllegalStateException when migrating

Am running oak-upgrade with the follow parameters and output. How do I determine what is the exact problem? Torgeirs-MacBook-Pro:jackrabbit-oak-1.5.18 tor$ java -jar ./oak-upgrade/target/oak-upgrade-1.5.18.jar --copy-binaries segment-old:/Users/tor/content/karriere/oak ~/content/karriere/oak-16

http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/construct.html out of sync with 1.6.0

It looks like the documentation is not in sync with the 1.6.0 codebase, eg http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/construct.html refers to using repository construction with the constructor of the SegmentNodeStore class. -- -Tor

Re: guava ByteStreams.equal()

rabbit/oak/upgrade/blob/ > LengthCachingDataStoreTest.java#L109 > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Torgeir Veimo <torgeir.ve...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The method > > > > ByteStreams.equal(InputSupplier, InputSupplier) > >

guava ByteStreams.equal()

The method ByteStreams.equal(InputSupplier, InputSupplier) is deprecated in guava 17 and removed in guava 18. Would it be an idea to replace the call to it by using the ByteSource.contentEquals(ByteSource) as suggested in guava 17? This would make it easier to deploy in a non-ogsi environment

Re: oak-lucene shaded

November 2016 at 18:56, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Torgeir Veimo <torgeir.ve...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Which other spi impl depends > > on the lucene libraries being exposed? >

Re: oak-lucene shaded

ted and > meant to be used by certain SPI implementations. So as of now there is > no solution for using a different Lucene version in non OSGi world > > > Chetan Mehrotra > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Torgeir Veimo <torgeir.ve...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >

Re: oak-lucene shaded

commons-logging org.apache Apache snapshots http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots true On 15 November 2016 at 11:12, Torgeir Veimo <torgeir.ve...@gmail.com&g

oak-lucene shaded

I'm in need of running oak in a non-osgi environment with a more recent version of lucene already on the classpath, so I've experimented with using the maven shade plugin to embed a shaded lucene jar inside the oak-lucene jar. I'm not very familiar with the shade plugin, so there might be better

Re: oak-upgrade problems migrating from Jackrabbit 2 to Oak

Maybe you can work around it by upgrading using tarmk, then copying to a mongodb repository when it's all done. On 23 September 2016 at 00:08, Robert Haycock < robert.hayc...@artificial-solutions.com> wrote: > Thanks Tomek, > > Getting closer! > > Looks like a setting somewhere needs

Re: Fwd: new atomicCounter support (OAK-2220)

type would be sufficient: https://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/object-id/ On 4 January 2016 at 20:35, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote: > On 21/12/2015 14:17, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > Can someone confirm if the atomic counter support code is suitable for > &g

Fwd: new atomicCounter support (OAK-2220)

immediately and isolated from other sessions incrementing the same counter, so using the results from an increment can safely be used as a sequence number as long as the counter is ever incremented in any code? On 13 November 2015 at 14:40, Torgeir Veimo <torgeir.ve...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: New Oak Example - Standalone Runnable Example based on Spring Boot

Do you have a similar example on how to configure with an actual embedded osgi container running? I'd imagine it would be nice to be able to shield all oak dependencies (eg lucene) from other dependencies a webapp uses. On 3 December 2015 at 18:50, Chetan Mehrotra

Re: JVM usage

Does your webapp restart during this time? On 17 October 2015 at 03:14, Jim.Tully wrote: > This is probably something that we are doing incorrectly, but it has me > scratching my head. > > We are running Oak embedded in a web application. We construct a repository > at

Re: Recipe for using Oak in standalone environments

Hi, better documentation is always welcome. For those using a spring environment, it would be nice if there was a version of the oak-lucene module that used jar shading to avoid leaking the embedded lucene 4.7 classes causing potential conflicts with other lucene versions which might be required

Re: JCR + MongoDb + Lucene Holy Grail Finally Found

On 5 August 2015 at 18:43, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: And on top of that, as you say, when one needs to integrate legacy/ugly code OSGi can be a lifesaver. Actually, OSGi is a requirement if integrating oak-lucene with any code that uses lucene, as oak-lucene is hard

Re: [jira] [Updated] (OAK-2736) Oak instance does not close the executors created upon ContentRepository creation

This issue was resolved then reopened. Was there any more activity towards getting it properly resolved? On 20 July 2015 at 20:05, Davide Giannella (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: [

Fwd: using mix:lockable throwing Unresolved conflicts in oak 1.2.2

I have some code which has been working flawlessly for a long time for getting sequence numbers, but with oak 1.2.2 it's started throwing exceptions. I am wondering if there's a way to use the org.apache.jackrabbit.util.Locked class so that it will not throw exceptions, when used with oak and the

Re: builder must be a org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentRootBuilder

, Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com wrote: Had a look in the source, and it appears this is due to the merge() method only being available in the DocumentRootBuilder, not in the NodeBuilder interface? Is there any other way to move a repository from tar storage to mongodb without regenerating

Fwd: builder must be a org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentRootBuilder

I didn't have much luck on the users list with this problem. Is there any work towards upgrading from tarmk to documentmk easier? I'm trying to move a repository from tarmk to mongodb, and am using the oak-run restore command, but am getting an exception; spazzo:oak-run torgeir$ java -jar

Re: builder must be a org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentRootBuilder

:26, Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't have much luck on the users list with this problem. Is there any work towards upgrading from tarmk to documentmk easier? I'm trying to move a repository from tarmk to mongodb, and am using the oak-run restore command, but am getting

Re: working lucene fulltext index

me know if you still face any issue Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://gist.github.com/chetanmeh/c1ccc4fa588ed1af467b On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com wrote: Sorted out my lucene version issues, so not getting that exception any more, but still not getting any

Re: working lucene fulltext index

' for NodeType 'ka:asset' 23:55:14,288 TRACE lucene.IndexDefinition.collectIndexRules() - line 535 [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] - Registering rule 'IndexRule: ka:asset' for name 'ka:asset' On 25 February 2015 at 16:49, Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com wrote: I tried without the async: async property on the lucene

working lucene fulltext index

I'm having trouble getting a working lucene fulltext index with oak 1.1.6. Have posted to the user ml, but with little response, so am hoping to be excused by posting here. My repository is configured with the following setup and InitialContext impl. Still, I am getting no results when using a

Re: working lucene fulltext index

Thank you for your reply! Setting the :childOrder helps reduce the warning logs. I am still getting these log entries a lot; 16:38:00,016 TRACE lucene.IndexDefinition.collectIndexRules() - line 519 [] - Found rule 'IndexRule: ka:asset' for NodeType 'ka:asset' 16:38:00,016 TRACE

Re: working lucene fulltext index

(Oak.java:518) at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.Jcr.createRepository(Jcr.java:202) at no.karriere.content.dao.jcr.repository.RepositoryConfiguration.getRepository(RepositoryConfiguration.java:93) On 25 February 2015 at 16:41, Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your reply

Re: how do you enable lucene search without OSGi or repository.xml?

This might be a bit late reply for you, but you can use select * from [nt:base] where lower(*) like '%string%' to search in multiple properties. On 23 October 2014 at 02:02, Adrien Lamoureux lamoureux.adr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Davide, But it turns out that the contains() does not work,

support for jcr 2.1 Node.addNodeAutoNamed()

Is there any work done on adding support for JCR 2.1 Node.addNodeAutoNamed() in oak? -- -Tor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0

Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments? On 9 May 2014 12:07, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0 release is available at:

Re: Roadmap for Jackrabbit 2.x and 3.0

Is there a guide for how to migrate from jackrabbit 2.* to oak? On 16 January 2014 18:51, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: On 15.1.14 7:35 , Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, a) Upgrade Jackrabbit Classic to use Lucene 4. As discussed earlier (http://markmail.org/message/nv5jeeoda7qe5qen)

Re: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

How about using an external elasticsearch or solr instance instead of lucene for your indexing needs? On 9 October 2013 18:21, Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Ok I see. Thanks for your feedback. I most likely won't dive alone in this task, given that there's some really tricky

Re: jackrabbit small issue : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen

This is with jackrabbit 2.6.0? There's no such property on org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager in 2.5.2 at least. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Bernardo D'Auria bernardo.dau...@uc3m.es wrote: Hi to everybody , I'm currently developing a web server application

Re: jackrabbit small issue : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen

Can't really see such a property for jackrabbit 2.6.0 either, for the class in question? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com wrote: This is with jackrabbit 2.6.0? There's no such property on org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager

Re: Use SOLR 3.x with JCR 2.x

On 7 May 2012 14:08, Peri Subrahmanya peri.subrahma...@gmail.com wrote: I wanted to get some direction on using SOLR as an external indexing tool with JCR2.x I know JCR comes with Lucene but for some custom needs we would like to use SOLR as the indexing module in JCR. Please advise. I assume

Re: Jackrabbit 2.4.2 release plan

On 20 April 2012 19:33, Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We can start preparing for the 2.4.2 release early next week. So far, all the issues that are marked 2.4.2 have already been backported. This is what is already included [0]. Any hope to get

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.1

+1 Confirmed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2836 fixed my issues with hanging threads. -- -Tor

Re: [jr3] Codename

On 27 February 2012 23:15, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote: or any other codename such as for example leaving the 'leporidae' for another animal family... Blackrabbit? -- -Tor (non-dev-member)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.0

On 4 February 2012 01:16, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@netenviron.com wrote: On 3 February 2012 22:53, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.4.0 release is available at: Feb 4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.0

On 3 February 2012 22:53, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.4.0 release is available at: Feb 4, 2012 12:04:30 AM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader clearReferencesThreads SEVERE: The web application [/main] appears to have started a thread

Re: Jackrabbit 2.4 release plan

On 1 February 2012 00:07, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: I think we should postpone cutting the 2.4.0 release two weeks ahead to the end of January. OK, I think it's now time to start making

[jira] Updated: (JCR-2490) jackrabbit wrongly think nodetype is changed on nodetype re-registration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Torgeir Veimo updated JCR-2490: --- Affects Version/s: 2.0.0 (was: 2.0-beta6) jackrabbit wrongly think

[jira] Created: (JCR-2606) option to specify in query if empty values are sorted first or last

Issue Type: New Feature Components: query Affects Versions: 2.0.0 Reporter: Torgeir Veimo Priority: Minor It would be of great value if there was a way to sort on a property, and specify wether nodes with empty / missing property values was put first or last

Re: jackrabbit wrongly finds changes in schema

On 10 February 2010 21:15, Marcel Reutegger marcel.reuteg...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, that sounds like a bug. can you please file a jira issue? Ok, created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2490 . -- -Tor

[jira] Created: (JCR-2490) jackrabbit wrongly think nodetype is changed on nodetype re-registration

Issue Type: Bug Components: nodetype Affects Versions: 2.0-beta6 Environment: Mac, derby pm, jdk 1.6, tomcat 6.0.24 Reporter: Torgeir Veimo When trying node type re-registration with jackrabbit 2.0, it wrongly detects a nodetype as having changed

Re: Jackrabbit 3: repository requirements

On 10 February 2010 01:55, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Now that Jackrabbit 2.0 is out and the major JCR 2.0 feature work is done, it's time to start looking ahead at Jackrabbit 3. We've talked about this a bit already at Day and I'll be posting a summary of our ideas for

Re: Jackrabbit web app deployment issue

2010/1/25 Bart van der Schans b.vandersch...@onehippo.com: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:10 PM,  george.sib...@bt.com wrote: The new Tomcat 6.0.24 release has some support to kill threads when the application fails to stop them: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/changelog.html Too bad it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.0-beta5

2009/12/18 Tobias Bocanegra tri...@day.com: [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.0-beta5 The javadoc link in the left column menu when you browse the webpage for the web application still points to JCR 1.0. -- -Tor

Re: Jackrabbit 2.0 release plan

2009/5/20 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Now that the trunk is reasonably stable again, I'm planning to cut the first 2.0 milestone release next week. Will a 1.5 repository be two-way binary compatible with a 2.0 repository? -- -Tor

Re: Removing old persistence managers in Jackrabbit 2.0

+1 I really need such a tool. Also having some external dump format just to move from one db server to another with the same pm setup would also be useful. 2009/5/6 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@day.com On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: I would

Re: Query regarding JCR-Oracle Universal Content Management

This mailing list is about developing the jackrabbit JCR reference implementation. If you need assistance with an Oracle product, I suggest that you call their support department. Most likely you can use JCR to connect to Oracle UCM if you have the Oracle content server JCR repository adapter

Re: JCR 2.0

What about soft references, they would be easy to do without waiting for jackrabbit 2.0? 2009/4/21 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Now that JSR-283 is in public review, do we have a plan how to get the

Re: Incubating Chemistry (Was: IP clearance for the Chemistry contribution)

It is a play on the letters; CheMIStry. 2009/4/22 Serge Huber shub...@jahia.com I might be jumping the gun a little, but if this can help, here are a few name suggestions : Apache Plug Apache Content Plug Apache Jackplug Apache Sea Miss (ok it's an awful word game :)) (or could be

Re: Jira notifications (Was: [jira] Commented: (JCRRMI-21) RMI: Unable to register NodeTypes)

True, but it's both informal and formal development discussions on the list. Jira messages goes in the second category. I merely follow the informal discussions. 2009/4/17 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com wrote

Re: [JCR 2.0] Proposed final draft of JSR-283 released

Is there a document somewhere detailing the enhancements relative to JSR-170? 2009/4/1 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@day.com Hello JCR community, if you haven't noticed it yet, the proposed final draft of JSR-283, the successor of JSR-170, ie. Java Content Repository version 2.0, is out.

Re: Regarding propfindtype request ...

If you want a webdav frontend to connect to your custom database schema, you cannot override the abstract debdav servlet, it will simply break in numerous ways. Either implement a custom backend to jackrabbit, or simply use a different webdav servlet. I'd suggest using the simple webdav servlet

Re: CMIS / Camaieu

What about CheMIStry? After all, it's about mixing various types of systems here. -- Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com

Re: Jackrabbit board report draft

to non-day developers for jackrabbit and sling now? I think getting more external committers was one of the requirements to get sling out of incubator status? -- Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 1.5.0

On 5 Dec 2008, at 21:37, Marcel Reutegger wrote: Torgeir Veimo wrote: On 2 Dec 2008, at 23:45, Jukka Zitting wrote: * Simple Google-style query language. The new GQL query syntax makes it very easy to express simple full text queries. How do I do a full text search, ie searching

Re: jcr-cmis sandbox

On 2 Dec 2008, at 20:04, Dominique Pfister wrote: -- + rest + ws Just as an observation, I think it's insane having two different protocols for this standard. It sounds like two factions in the standards group that could never agree. -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apache Jackrabbit 1.5.0 build 2

. -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apache Jackrabbit 1.5.0 build 2

: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Document is invalid: no grammar found. But otherwise the repository is fully usable . -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Updated: (JCR-1808) deploying 1.5.0-b1 with existing DB from 1.4.6 throws exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Torgeir Veimo updated JCR-1808: --- Attachment: repository.xml repository used when creating repository with 1.4.5. deploying 1.5.0-b1

[jira] Commented: (JCR-1808) deploying 1.5.0-b1 with existing DB from 1.4.6 throws exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12639635#action_12639635 ] Torgeir Veimo commented on JCR-1808: It appears the repository.xml I'm using with JR 1.5

[jira] Commented: (JCR-1808) deploying 1.5.0-b1 with existing DB from 1.4.6 throws exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12639641#action_12639641 ] Torgeir Veimo commented on JCR-1808: My impression was that the repository.xml file

Re: Apache Jackrabbit 1.5.0 build 1

On 13 Oct 2008, at 17:30, Jukka Zitting wrote: You can find the 1.5.0-b1 sources and binaries as a source archive and a staged maven repository at: http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/ Can't see any binaries there, will they be made available later? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL

Re: Trunk is now 1.6-SNAPSHOT

On 13 Oct 2008, at 19:26, Jukka Zitting wrote: Now that 1.5 is branched, I have upgraded the version number in trunk to 1.6-SNAPSHOT. What exiting new features will be worked on in the near future in trunk? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apache Jackrabbit 1.5.0 build 1

) at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeUpdate(Unknown Source) at org .apache .jackrabbit .core .persistence .bundle .BundleDbPersistenceManager .checkSchema(BundleDbPersistenceManager.java:438) ... 57 more -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Created: (JCR-1808) deploying 1.5.0-b1 with existing DB from 1.4.6 throws exception

Components: jackrabbit-core Affects Versions: 1.5.0 Environment: tomcat 6.0.14, jdk 1.5 OS X, derby persistence Reporter: Torgeir Veimo Priority: Blocker Attachments: log.txt Trying out the new jackrabbit build 1.5.0-b1 with an existing repository

[jira] Updated: (JCR-1808) deploying 1.5.0-b1 with existing DB from 1.4.6 throws exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Torgeir Veimo updated JCR-1808: --- Attachment: log.txt stacktrace deploying 1.5.0-b1 with existing DB from 1.4.6 throws exception

Re: Jackrabbit 1.5 release plan

On 10 Oct 2008, at 00:40, Jukka Zitting wrote: Since there are no major issues pending for 1. Is the new user management feature documented somewhere, except for the jsr-283 draft? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: how to Connect to the Repository

On 23 Sep 2008, at 12:53, xing007008 wrote: Yes. Now, I need to write the class ExistDBRespository(); Who can give me the demo? The demo is called Jackrabbit. -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Link to the venue for today's Amsterdam meetup (wiki down)

On 8 Apr 2008, at 06:58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: The wiki is down ATM, if people are looking for the venue it's Pakhuis de Zwijger, links: Can we get a rudimentary transcript for those who weren't able to attend? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jackrabbit roadmap

On 12 Jan 2008, at 03:23, Jukka Zitting wrote: * Node type management Based on this proposal? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1171 There hasn't been any more comments on that issue for a while. -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jackrabbit roadmap

On 12 Jan 2008, at 12:35, Torgeir Veimo wrote: On 12 Jan 2008, at 03:23, Jukka Zitting wrote: * Node type management Sorry, meant * Built-in access control Based on this proposal? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1171 There hasn't been any more comments on that issue

Re: AccessManager Help?

On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:46 -0700, Ashley Martens wrote: I'm trying to modify a custom AccessManager by having it check properties of the node that is being accessed. However, I can't get to the Node from the AccessManager. I know this sounds stupid but how do you give the AccessManager a

graffito mapping dtd

Can this one be made accessible on a public URL now that it's part of jackrabbit? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jackrabbit in ApacheCon Europe

On 3 Jan 2007, at 11:56, Jukka Zitting wrote: I'd also like to know if there's interest enough for a potential half-day tutorial on building JCR applications with Jackrabbit. My company would be interested at least. -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

jcr taglib: setting node attribute with object doesn't work

If I use the properties tag and et a node attribue with a java object, it doesn't work, since the setNode() method in PropertyTag.java takes a string as an argument. There's no category for the jcr taglib in jira? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jcr taglib: setting node attribute with object doesn't work

On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:31 -0300, Edgar Poce wrote: Maybe we should update the taglib to work with jsp 2.0. That would be easier, since I use EL extensively in my pages. I'm not sure how to instruct the page compiler that the tag wants to evaluate the attribute value itself. -- Torgeir

[jira] Created: (JCR-659) import of multivalue properties with single value results in incorrect property creation

: Jackrabbit Issue Type: Bug Components: core Affects Versions: 1.1 Environment: Linux, Tomcat 5.5.20, JDK 1.6.0rc1, both xml file repository and derby db repository. Reporter: Torgeir Veimo When importing a file exported with system view, a value

Re: multivalue import problem

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:41 +, Torgeir Veimo wrote: On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:08 +, Torgeir Veimo wrote: On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:21 +, Torgeir Veimo wrote: I've got a node type def like this; [nen:protected] mix:referenceable mixin orderable - nen:owner (string

[jira] Commented: (JCR-600) Repository does not release all resources on shutdown

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-600?page=comments#action_12454371 ] Torgeir Veimo commented on JCR-600: --- I've done a bit more testing and it does in-fact seem to work properly now, so I guess this issue can be resolved as fixed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 1.1.1

[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.1.1 -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

maven build problem of svn source

/jackrabbit/maven.xml Element... ant:delete Line.. 160 Column 21 /home/torgeir/java/src/jackrabbit/target/generated-src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/query/sql not found. Total time : 3 seconds Finished at : Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:35:22 AM GMT -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >