Bug report for JMeter [2011/04/03]

2011-04-03 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: [JMeter] JUnit sampler sample time changes

2011-04-03 Thread sebb
That reminds me - Tests I've done on Windows show that nanoTime() drifts considerably when compared with currentTimeMillis(), i.e. its clock does not appear to run at the same rate. Here's a simple test you can run: public class NanoDrift { public static void main(String[] args) throws

Re: [JMeter] JUnit sampler sample time changes

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Lin
I've talked with BEA's JRockit team in the past regarding the differences in Nano time on different platforms. Given these issues, using nano time in JMeter is difficult at best. From what I am told by Henrik stahl, making nano time reliable and performant isn't trivial, so using it to measure

Re: svn commit: r1088435 - in /jakarta/jmeter/trunk: bin/ src/core/org/apache/jmeter/util/ src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/sampler/ xdocs/ xdocs/usermanual/

2011-04-03 Thread sebb
On 4 April 2011 00:13, milam...@apache.org wrote: Author: milamber Date: Sun Apr  3 23:13:09 2011 New Revision: 1088435 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088435view=rev Log: Bug 50170 - Bytes reported by http sampler is after GUnZip Add an optional property to allow change the method