Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

Should this be cherry-picked to master? @nacx: I'd prefer to see a new PR with some successful PR builds and, if possible, confirmation of a successful live test run..? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-28287406

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

Hey guys. any reason this pull request is not accepted yet? i cherry picked it into my own fork and can also verify that is works well. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-28146265

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

thanks @iliapolo! nope this is supposed to deal only with CCIs --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-28146758

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

Ah sorry, didn't know that mostly because I've never used that feature. Not sure it can help you, but this [link](http://sldn.softlayer.com/search/apachesolr_search/bare%20metal) shows that bare metal is an extra flag for most of the supported hardware. So maybe it is possible with the current

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

thanks, though i think this flag is just a part of the response, letting you know if the order is bare metal or not. to actually order a bare metal instance there is a different API http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Hardware/createObject --- Reply to this email directly or

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

Hey guys. any reason this pull request is not accepted yet? @iliapolo: Now that I see the main remaining TODO item has been resolved, there should be no reason, no! I'll try to merge this in the course of the day... --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

jclouds » jclouds #591 UNSTABLE Looks like an unrelated [test

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

Committed to [1.6.x](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=f278450355bbaa95c841c2f857a528091b90d723) and updated [JCLOUDS-213](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-213). Thanks, @andreaturli! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

@andreaturli, I'm sure Adrian was joking - if not he can open a Jira for 1.8 :smile: demobox's comment [here](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-27805666) still has two unticked items, and another comment

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #836](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/836/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-27952263

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

[jclouds » jclouds #591](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/591/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

he was joking, isn't he? Yes, apologies if that wasn't clear! Both comments about the package rename were jokes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-27960098

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #831](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/831/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-27808671