Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-21 Thread Ignasi
+1 to release as soon as possible. As discussed in the other thread, I also think the package rename should be delayed until 2.0. Regarding the Chef thing, I am open to whatever is preferred. It is very stable and can be merged without issues in the main repo, but I don't think this should be a

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-20 Thread Andrew Phillips
Yup, mentioned in the wiki. Doh, sloppy reading, sorry. It didn't render properly for me, I think (see attachment) - should be fixed now [1]? ap [1] https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Releasing%20jclouds?action=diffrev1=27rev2=28

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-20 Thread Andrew Gaul
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:18:02AM -0800, Andrew Bayer wrote: So with 1.6.3 aiming to be out next week, I'd like to put a target date on 1.7.0 - we really need to get that sucker out! I'm gonna tentatively plan to do the first RC on Monday, December 9th. There are a fair number of issues

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-20 Thread Andrew Phillips
Should we publish 1.7 alpha/beta artifacts like we did pre-ASF? Ideally we would have done this regularly during the 1.7 development cycle. If we can find a way to do this reasonably quickly (ideally, automatically!) I'm sure that would help. As it is (hope it's been smooth for you, Andrew

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-20 Thread Andrew Phillips
Should we publish 1.7 alpha/beta artifacts like we did pre-ASF? Ideally we would have done this regularly during the 1.7 development cycle. ... Would work for me - they've been stable for ages, see active use and improvements and don't feel significantly less generic that e.g. route53. ap I

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-19 Thread Andrew Phillips
Just did a bit of cleanup on the 1.6.x branch of jclouds-labs-openstack to get its versioning in a sane way - turns out the sane way was already in place for 1.7.0 there, so woo. Checking the others now, but I think we're ok with an extra step I specified on the release process wiki. Do we need

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-15 Thread Everett Toews
On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: So with 1.6.3 aiming to be out next week, I'd like to put a target date on 1.7.0 - we really need to get that sucker out! I'm gonna tentatively plan to do the first RC on Monday, December 9th. +1 Everett

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-15 Thread Alex Heneveld
+1 Best, Alex On Nov 15, 2013 4:22 PM, Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com wrote: On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: So with 1.6.3 aiming to be out next week, I'd like to put a target date on 1.7.0 - we really need to get that sucker out! I'm gonna tentatively plan

1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Andrew Bayer
So with 1.6.3 aiming to be out next week, I'd like to put a target date on 1.7.0 - we really need to get that sucker out! I'm gonna tentatively plan to do the first RC on Monday, December 9th. There are a fair number of issues still open against 1.7.0 - see

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Ignasi
Sounds good to me. I'd really like to have the issue (don't remember the id) to configure the versioning in the sub-repos completed for 1.7. It has been done in several repos but not in all of them (at least jclouds-labs is still remaining), and I think it is important that we have a consistent

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Andrew Bayer
I believe you're talking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-141 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-104? A. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ignasi ignasi.barr...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good to me. I'd really like to have the issue (don't remember the id) to

Re: 1.7.0 scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Ignasi
...@rackspace.com wrote: Is there a short overview of what the current plan is? Is it 141? From: Andrew Bayer [andrew.ba...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:17 PM To: dev@jclouds.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.7.0 scheduling I believe you're talking