Re: [jclouds-labs-google] fix JCLOUDS-362 inferring project-id from identity when there is a hyphen (#9)

Thanks for the changes, @ahgittin. Apart my minor comment on line 104 looks good to me. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/9#issuecomment-27683201

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

thanks @iliapolo! nope this is supposed to deal only with CCIs --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/77#issuecomment-28146758

Re: [jclouds] Fix provider softlayer (#77)

Ah sorry, didn't know that mostly because I've never used that feature. Not sure it can help you, but this [link](http://sldn.softlayer.com/search/apachesolr_search/bare%20metal) shows that bare metal is an extra flag for most of the supported hardware. So maybe it is possible with the current

Re: [jclouds] fix for JCLOUDS-373 (#199)

OK @nacx, done. Thanks all! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/199#issuecomment-28285876

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-375: Fix VirtualGuestToNodeMetadata when server returns SoftLayer_Exception_Order_Item_Duplicate (#200)

Sorry @nacx, now it should be better --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/200#issuecomment-28289768

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-375: Fix VirtualGuestToNodeMetadata when server returns SoftLayer_Exception_Order_Item_Duplicate (#200)

Shall I reopen [JCLOUDS-213](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-213) and [JCLOUDS-373](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-373) or only the generic JCLOUDS-213 ? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jclouds] JCLOUDS-373: Fix SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException. (#204)

- SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException extends IllegalStateException for consistency and for Throwables2.propagateIfPossible You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/andreaturli/jclouds fix/softlayer-exception Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-373: Fix SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException. (#204)

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ */ package org.jclouds.softlayer.exceptions; -public class SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException extends RuntimeException { +public class SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException extends IllegalStateException { I agree with @demobox as well but @nacx the invoked method

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-373: Fix SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException. (#204)

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ */ package org.jclouds.softlayer.exceptions; -public class SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException extends RuntimeException { +public class SoftLayerOrderItemDuplicateException extends IllegalStateException { I'm ok with `IllegalArgumentException` as a quick win

Re: Propagatin custom exceptions in providers/apis

+1 On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Alex Heneveld alex.henev...@cloudsoftcorp.com wrote: +1 even better On 14/11/2013 10:11, Ignasi wrote: Thinking a bit more about this, as HttpResponseException is already propagated, would it make sense that provider specific exceptions extend it

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-336. Move to GCE v1beta16 API. (#36)

let's close this request for now, I'll reopen it as soon as I can get the LiveTests running again. Thanks @ahgittin and @abayer! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/36#issuecomment-28507953

Re: [jclouds-site] add softlayer cloudlayer quickstart (#49)

Thanks @demobox I've just submitted a new commit --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/49#issuecomment-31467395

Re: [jclouds-site] add softlayer cloudlayer quickstart (#49)

+Set? extends org.jclouds.compute.domain.Image image = compute.listImages(); + +// Create nodes with templates +Template template = compute.templateBuilder().osFamily(OsFamily.UBUNTU).build(); +// by default, all the nodes created by jclouds will have `jclouds.org` as domain name.

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#51)

Thanks guys for your great job! fwiw I think you can try http://getbootstrap.com/css/#overview-responsive-images for jclouds logo as for example on my s3 this is what I can see: http://goo.gl/xRTFK6 and also the buttons look confused http://goo.gl/CE0CQU HTH --- Reply to this email directly

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#51)

+1 I think it would be interesting to evaluate something like this gist-it.appspot.com to embed a snippet of live (working!) code taken i.e. from jclouds-examples' pom.xml refactored as @everett-toews suggested. Not sure about the graphical result of something like: script

Re: [jclouds] Upgrading Bouncy Castle to 1.49 (1.50 has issues with OSGi) (#273)

@demobox, is it possible that we need to add also ``` dependency groupIdorg.bouncycastle/groupId artifactIdbcpkix-jdk15on/artifactId version1.49/version /dependency ``` as for example jclouds-labs-google is now complaining because

[jclouds-labs-google] [JCLOUDS-442] reduces the firewalls created by createNodesInGroup (#20)

You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/andreaturli/jclouds-labs-google fix/firewalls Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/20 -- Commit Summary -- * [JCLOUDS-442] reduces the firewalls

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] [JCLOUDS-442] reduces the firewalls created by createNodesInGroup (#20)

@@ -48,6 +48,17 @@ version${jclouds.version}/version /dependency dependency +groupIdorg.bouncycastle/groupId +artifactIdbcpkix-jdk15on/artifactId +version1.49/version +exclusions +exclusion +

Re: [jclouds] Upgrading Bouncy Castle to 1.49 (1.50 has issues with OSGi) (#273)

@demobox It's happening with a LiveTest --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/273#issuecomment-33807371

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] [JCLOUDS-442] reduces the firewalls created by createNodesInGroup (#20)

Ouch, sorry you are right, but those failures are 2 expectedTests unrelated to the bouncycastle. I'll fix that asap --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/20#issuecomment-33820860

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] [JCLOUDS-442] reduces the firewalls created by createNodesInGroup (#20)

@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ version${jclouds.version}/version /dependency dependency +groupIdorg.bouncycastle/groupId +artifactIdbcpkix-jdk15on/artifactId +version1.49/version +/dependency +dependency

Re: [jclouds] Upgrading Bouncy Castle to 1.49 (1.50 has issues with OSGi) (#273)

@demobox I can confirm you that by excluding sshj from jclouds-sshj driver and adding what you susggested above things are ok (obviously removing my bouncycastle extra dep as well) So seems like upgrading sshj is the way to go. Thanks! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Adding bcpkix to the jclouds-sshj driver. Required by sshj. (#278)

@demobox I've checked the `add-bcpki-1.7.x` branch and built it. Then using only ``` dependency groupIdorg.apache.jclouds.driver/groupId artifactIdjclouds-sshj/artifactId version1.7.1-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency ``` on

Re: Support to spawn/stop LXC instances via jClouds :-)

Thanks Nirmal, yeah it is quite ready to be PRed. Need some more time to refine the implementation. Cheers, Andrea On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote: Apparently, Andreas seems to have a more improved version which he has built from a quite some time now.

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] [JCLOUDS-442] reduces the firewalls created by createNodesInGroup (#20)

+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState; +import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.contains; +import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.filter; +import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.transform; +import static

Re: [SoftLayer] User Data in SoftLayerTemplateOptions

this helps, Andrea [1]: http://javadocs.jclouds.cloudbees.net/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.Builder.html Andrea Turli Il 08/mar/2014 17:17 Imesh Gunaratne im...@apache.org ha scritto: Hi, I'm from Apache Stratos (incubating) team and trying to use jclouds Softlayer

Re: [SoftLayer] User Data in SoftLayerTemplateOptions

. El 08/03/2014 18:51, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com escribió: Hi Imesh, as a general information, jclouds already supports userData through TemplateOptions [1] so there is no need to extend TemplateOptions into SoftLayerTemplateOptions for that. Unfortunately looking

Re: [SoftLayer] Error when invoking getOrderTemplate() method

Imesh, this kind of errors are the driving reason for our refactoring: in fact, very often the current implementation fails in listing pre-existing manually created nodes with exceptions similar to the one you had. We hope to have a new version soon to have all of those problems solved. Best,

Re: GCE query

Hi Suriya, for network operations quota exceeded please look at your ' https://console.developers.google.com/project/PROJECT_ID/compute/quotas' and try to clean up networks before running the liveTests. Best, Andrea On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ignasi Barrera

Re: [SoftLayer] Error when invoking getOrderTemplate() method

Imesh, Just to clarify, if I checkout 1.7.1 branch and apply this pull request on top would it be ok for the moment? It should be ok, even if it can be unstable. Best, Andrea

Re: GCE query

-basics/pom.xml Thanks Suriya On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Suriya, for network operations quota exceeded please look at your ' https://console.developers.google.com/project/ PROJECT_ID/compute/quotas' and try to clean up

Re: [SoftLayer] Error when invoking getOrderTemplate() method

/jclouds.git git fetch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds.git refs/pull/296/head But as I found the new checkout I got was different from my previous. Could you please guide me how to fetch your pull request to a fresh local repository? Thanks Imesh On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Andrea

Re: [SoftLayer] Error when invoking getOrderTemplate() method

Hi Imesh, I've committed a new version of soflayer on my branch `refactor/softlayer` commit 56931cb9599d251122828b462c2fae2f171f56b6 It would be nice if you can test it and report on ML your feedback/impressions. Thanks, Andrea On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu

Re: GCE query

this process a couple of times, it was easy to fill in the form and both times I have had my request approved in less than a day. Richard. On 11 March 2014 09:00, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Suriya, unfortunately I can see your limit is pretty low (5 networks

Re: jclouds-labs-google and nodes not created by jclouds

Andrew P., in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-442 my intent was to avoid the creation of too many firewalls as the current implementation is doing. I'm not sure if this will solve (incidentally) also the issue discussed here. Andrea On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Andrew

Re: Google cloud support

Hi, I've just issued a PR to support TargetPool, TargetInstance and HttpHealthCheck API https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/22 Please have a look and comment on it. Andrea On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org wrote: Hi Mikolaj, Thanks for your

Re: Support to spawn/stop LXC instances via jClouds :-)

Hi all, I'm happy to say that the initial support for Docker is under review (thanks Ignasi!) Please feel free to checkout it from https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/57 and report on the behavior/expectations or suggestions. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Andrea Turli

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache jclouds-1.7.2 RC2

closed, and with 4 binding +1s, we're ready to release. +1: * Andrew Phillips (binding) * Ignasi Barrera (binding) * Andrea Turli * Everett Toews (binding) * Andrew Gaul (binding) 0: none -1: none Thanks to everyone for testing this RC! ap

Re: Test Client for JCloud-OpenStack Swift ?

Hi, I can see your test is trying to hit http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens Are you sure localhost is your keystone server? My two cents, Andrea Il 18/apr/2014 21:15 SANDEEP BAZAR sandeepba...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi, Yes I have entered correct -Dtest.swift-keystone.identity and

Re: Best way to handle GCE's obsolete machine types?

Hi Mikolaj, thanks for reporting that. I think the best approach would be to make jclouds aware of the obsolete machineTypes by considering the deprecated field in the MachineType domain object, so (b) if I get you right. I've already a patch that deals with it that I can submit asap. Best,

Re: Best way to handle GCE's obsolete machine types?

Hi, I've issued a PR to fix that issue: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/24 Please review it and merge, if ok. Thanks, Andrea On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mikolaj, thanks for reporting that. I think the best approach would

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.7.3 RC1

My vote is +1 (non binding) I've executed the release verification script ./verify_jclouds_release.sh 1.7.3-rc1.available at https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Validate%20a%20Release * Executed the validation script available at https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Validate%20a%20Release for linux: -

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.7.3 RC1

Andrew, yeah they've been failing for a bit (last release had the same results), that's why I've refactored sl provider support that will be available on 1.8.x I guess as it is not backward compatible. Best, Andrea On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Andrew Phillips aphill...@qrmedia.com wrote:

Re: JIRA versions cleanup

+1 Andrea Il 16/lug/2014 22:01 Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org ha scritto: Now that there seems to be an agreement that next release will be 1.8.0, what about removing from JIRA the earlier unreleased versions? We still have there 1.5.11, 1.6.4 and 1.7.4, and IMO that only causes the

Re: Exception in list images - Docker test client with 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi Sajith, could you also share the docker engine version you are using to have a better understanding of your environment? Thanks, Andrea Il 23/lug/2014 11:03 Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org ha scritto: Hi Sajith, In the json you've passed all images have the Id field, so that NPE should

Re: Exception in list images - Docker test client with 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT

] at test.docker.client.MainClass.main(MainClass.java:56) [classes/:na] On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sajith, could you also share the docker engine version you are using to have a better understanding of your environment? Thanks, Andrea Il 23/lug

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.8.0 RC1

Sorry about that guys, not sure how that happened. @Andrew could you please remove it as it is just an error? Thanks, Andrea On 7/31/14, Andrew Phillips aphill...@qrmedia.com wrote: I notice we now have a dockerFile in the root of jclouds-labs [1]. I'm pretty sure that doesn't belong there?

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (9b124ee)

6, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Andrea Turli notificati...@github.com wrote: By default, Docker assigns a NAT'ed IP to the created container which is parsed in the Container domain class If you need more advanced networking configuration you can try http://jpetazzo.github.io/2013/10/16/configure

Re: antlr4 Annotation Processor

Hi Jeremy, Sounds like a neat improvement. I'm not familiar enough with antlr so I'm curious of when those annotations are processed? Is there a mvn plugin? Best, Andrea Il 08/ago/2014 18:58 Jeremy Daggett jeremy.dagg...@rackspace.com ha scritto: Hi devs, Several of us have chatted about

Re: [jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-500] Initial commit for docker (9b124ee)

) Thanks, -Liang On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Yes Liang, try with ContextBuilder builder = ContextBuilder.newBuilder(provider) .credentials(identity, credential

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-743 - Remove vcloud providers that no longer support version 1.0 (#543)

Hi, +1 as vcloud is no longer supported. We should definitely finalize vcloud-director, possibly bump the impl to 5.5 as 1.5 is deprecated and take finally vcloud-director out of labs. Best, Andrea Il 05/ott/2014 01:51 Adrian Cole adrian.f.c...@gmail.com ha scritto: Well vcloud-director in

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.8.1 RC1

+1 (binding) * Executed the validation script: - Source code compiles and passes all tests - There are no RAT violations - Checksums match - Signatures match * All LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct * I ran also LiveTests for Docker and SoftLayer: - SoftLayer: Tests run: 154,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.8.1 RC1

Ops, my vote is +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) * Executed the validation script: - Source code compiles and passes all tests - There are no RAT violations - Checksums match - Signatures match * All LICENSE

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.8.1 RC1

to add yourself as the steward for Softlayer and Docker on our Stewards [1] page? I don’t mean to put you on the spot but I wanted to throw it out there. Regards, Everett [1] https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Stewards On Oct 17, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: +1

Re: Call 1.8.x bankruptcy on jclouds-labs-google?

+1 for 1.9.x branch On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Chris Custine chris.cust...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for a new 1.9 release and branch. -- Chris Custine On November 3, 2014 at 9:36:10 PM, Adrian Cole (adrian.f.c...@gmail.com) wrote: I tried to start sorting out 1.8.x vs master on

RE: [DISCUSS] What is the criteria for something to be in the jclouds/jclouds repo?

Hi, I personally think we should consider a couple of additional criteria to the good Zack's list. The code should support the latest stable (recommended) version of the API. The implementation should follow all the current guidelines (i. e. Use of Auto Value and Service, MWS, no async API) so

Re: Contributing Azure support

Hi! +1; will be great to have fully functioning azure support! With great coincidence of timing, I submitted a PR yesterday [1] to the jclouds-labs for azurecompute. We need Azure support for the downstream Apache Brooklyn [2] and Clocker [3] projects. Microsoft have kindly provided us a

Re: [DISCUSS] next release / roadmap

As next release will be 1.9.0, could we now create new branches 1.9.x out of current masters? On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 5:17:20 PM Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org wrote: Regarding the TODOs, Dan has done a great job in GCE and I helped with the live tests. Most of them are passing now, if not all,

Re: Working on Azure compute provider

Hi Francesco, thanks for your interest in jclouds! Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are working hard to improve it. You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.0 RC1

Hi, +1 I've downloaded source files from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jclouds/1.9.0-rc1/ - Source code compiles and passes all tests - There are no RAT violations - Checksums match - Signatures match Please find also the results of the live tests I've run against SoftLayer

Re: Master code freeze

Thanks Ignasi! Andrea Il 13/mar/2015 23:07 Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org ha scritto: Hi! I'll cut the 1.9.0 elease this weekend, so consider the master branch frozen in all repos until the release is done. Committers, please hold on and don't commit there. Thanks for your help! I.

Re: [DISCUSS] next release / roadmap

+1 Thanks Ignasi On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:11 PM Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org wrote: There have been no responses, but several in this thread, including me, would like a release, so I'll cut the 1.9.0 release this weekend. On 27 February 2015 at 10:28, Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.0 RC2

+1 I've downloaded source files from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jclouds/1.9.0-rc2/ - Source code compiles and passes all tests - There are no RAT violations - Checksums match - Signatures match Please find also the results of the live tests I've run against SoftLayer Tests

Re: Working on Azure compute provider

: On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote: Hi Francesco, thanks for your interest in jclouds! Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are working hard to improve it. You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of pending PRs which

Re: Question about GCE Provider

addresses. [1] I think we should switch to using the default network and only creating a new network if the user specifies that is what they want. [1] https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/networking#networks_1 On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Daniel

Re: Question about GCE Provider

to avoid conflicts. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Broudy bro...@google.com wrote: I thing targetTags are exactly the way to go in this case. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Daniel, I agree that network-per-group idea doesn't scale

Re: Question about GCE Provider

Daniel, Is it a common use case to spin up more than 5 node groups on one project? I think in jclouds we should support the most generic case possible, not only 5 node groups then. If it is, we should not be creating one network per node group on GCE because there is quota of 5 networks per

Re: How to retrieve the ComputeServiceContext from api/provider

No particular reasons, just easier, I guess. Thanks Il giorno mer 24 giu 2015 22:15 Andrew Phillips aphill...@qrmedia.com ha scritto: great question. Basically I need to create a new ContextBuilder from inside the ComputeServiceAdapter of the providerA to invoke the APIs of a providerB.

Re: How to retrieve the ComputeServiceContext from api/provider

I think a simple solution can be to inject @Provider SupplierURI endpoint, @Provider SupplierCredentials creds where needed. Thanks, Andrea On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:47 PM Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I need to access the values of the endpoint, identity and credentials

How to retrieve the ComputeServiceContext from api/provider

Hi, I need to access the values of the endpoint, identity and credentials of a provider from inside the provider's ComputeServiceAdapter itself. What is the recommended way in jclouds? Best, Andrea

Re: How to retrieve the ComputeServiceContext from api/provider

Andrew, great question. Basically I need to create a new ContextBuilder from inside the ComputeServiceAdapter of the providerA to invoke the APIs of a providerB. Best, Andrea On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:50 PM Andrew Phillips aphill...@qrmedia.com wrote: I think a simple solution can be to

Re: Promote Google Compute Engine to core

+1 On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:20 PM Alex Heneveld alex.henev...@cloudsoftcorp.com wrote: Yes, do it! Best Alex On 26/06/2015 11:18, Ignasi Barrera wrote: Unless anyone says the opposite Today I plan to push the Google Compute Engine provider [1] to the main repo. Those subscribed

Re: DigitalOcean v2 to 1.9.x

Personally I've always consider jclouds-labs as a common repo for the labs repos, so in my mind this implicit dependency has always been there. Moreover, the recent changes to OAuth made this provider certainly useful to many other providers, not only Google's, so I think it should go to

Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider

:49, Andrea Turli andrea.tu...@gmail.com escribió: Thanks Ignasi! Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981 Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint

Re: 1.9.1 - what's left?

Hi, I'm still trying to fix a couple of broken liveTests for SoftLayer. If you are in hurry for this release, please go ahead as I don't want to be the bottleneck. Best, Andrea On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:50 PM Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org wrote: I'd say just merge this [1] to master and

Re: 1.9.1 - what's left?

Thanks guys for your great effort! On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:53 PM Ignasi Barrera n...@apache.org wrote: I don't think we have corrupted files in the repo; jenkins would complain. One failure I got was in jclouds-labs detecting the digitalocean2 folder as deleted and modified, and in another

Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider

Hi Francesco, all, I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require to create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute to skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure

Re: Patches to master and 1.9.x?

+1 Even if not planned we may need to cut another fixing release from 1.9.x so backporting sounds sensible. Andrea On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > Hi! > > I think we all have an agreement that we should release jclouds 2.0 as > soon as possible, and

Azure ARM vs classic

Hi, currently we are struggling to have a good jclouds-azurecompute api to be promoted to jclouds/jclouds. I've noticed that MS suggests now to use (and/or switch) to ARM (Azure Resource Manager) and they have marked the previous API (and also the console) with `classic` label. I don't know if

Re: Azure ARM vs classic

+1 let's merge soon https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/197 and promote azurecompute! On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > On 11/12/2015 11:18, Andrea Turli wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> currently we are str

Re: Azure ARM vs classic

ill facilitate us the deprecation of the legacy one when the > classic api is shut down. > > On 11 December 2015 at 13:05, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > let's merge soon https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/197 and > > p

Re: Create new api

Hi Antonio, Thanks for your interest in jclouds. I guess ONE stands for OpenNebula. Let me try to give you a little context about jclouds philosophy: although each cloud provider offers (very often) multiple SDKs to consume their APIs, jclouds tends to re-implement them to minimize the footprint

Re: New OpenNebula Provider

Hi Paolo, I think jclouds-labs/digitalocean v2 or jclouds-labs/docker would be a good start. Merry christmas, Andrea Il giorno sab 26 dic 2015 14:24 ha scritto: > Hi all and Merry Christmas!! > I would like to create a new provider for jclouds that support >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.2 RC1

+1 Ran scripts on OS X 10.11.2 $ java -version java version "1.8.0_31" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_31-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.31-b07, mixed mode) $ verify_jclouds_rc.sh: OK Best, Andrea On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:46 AM Reijhanniel Jearl Campos

Re: Azure ARM vs classic

y no ongoing development to support ARM, so > I'd say "go for it!". > > Regarding the best way to start, I'd suggest to listen to what Andrea > Turli or Francesco think, as they are the ones who developed the > current azurecompute provider and will know better if its cu

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-664) Azure compute support

[~ritazh] I've seen your message on ML, thanks for that. That's pretty good news! I don't think there is any ongoing effort to add ARM support so your help would be much appreciated. Feel free to ask questions/guidance on ML or IRC if you guys are keen to start the implementation! Il giorno ven

Re: ProfitBricks provider promotion

+1 Speaking of promotions, can we consider jclouds-docker as mature as profitbricks ? Best, Andrea Il giorno mar 16 feb 2016 18:33 Ignasi Barrera ha scritto: > ProfitBricks is one of the most mature providers in labs and it's complete > with regard to the compute abstraction,

Re: Support for OpenStack Keystone API v3

> --Morgan > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Apoorva Deshpande <apoor...@tintri.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Unfortunately I don’t have time to participate in the effort. > >> Since Keystone v3 support is critical to our clients we would ne

Re: Support for OpenStack Keystone API v3

Hi Apoorva, Not planned yet, afaik, are you keen to help with that? Andrea Il ven 1 apr 2016 14:32 Apoorva Deshpande ha scritto: > (cc: Keystone core team members ) > > Hello All, > > We use jclouds to communicate with OpenStack Keystone. I wanted to know if > jclouds is

Re: Limited Internet access

Enjoy your holidays! Il 12/ago/2016 17:25, "Ignasi Barrera" ha scritto: > Hi! > > I'll be on vacation the next two weeks and I'll have limited Internet > access. I'll be around to complete the GSoC project, but I don't expect to > have much time merging PRs :) > > See you in a

Re: Help with jClouds

Thanks Nelson, I guess the first step is to update the Network domain object to reflect the latest reference https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/reference/latest/networks#resource Then we can discuss how to use the subnetworks. Andrea Il dom 7 ago 2016 16:48 Nelson Araujo

Re: Removing the Azure classic provider

I think it would be good to deprecate it now and keep it for the next couple of releases and finally remove it. Andrea On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > Hi! > > The Azure ARM provider has been around for a while, and now it will > have support for all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.1 RC1

+1 Run the verification scripts to check the following: * Checksums are valid * Signatures are valid * The expanded source archive builds and passes tests * All files have license headers where appropriate * Expanded source archives match the contents of the RC tags * All LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.1 RC1

I'm seeing the same problem from osx. Shall we fix that for RC2? Il mar 21 feb 2017 19:40 Andrew Gaul ha scritto: > Can anyone reproduce the failing karaf vagrant symptoms when running the > verify script? I am running on Ubuntu 14.04 using JDK 1.8.0_121. I > attached the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 2.0.1 RC1

I think it is an important one, let's cut a RC2 and test again. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > Hi! > > While testing the new Azure ARM security group extension I've found a > small issue here [1]. Basically we are not dealing properly the "all >

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] [JCLOUDS-1233] bump jax-rs version (#1057)

I'm sure https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/92 fixes it but I will extract it from that PR and submit asap a patch On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > Looks like this has broken jclouds-karaf: >

Re: OpenStack Compute (Nova) v3 API

Thanks Ignasi, just wondering what does it mean for jclouds to support multiple versions of the same API at the same time? For example, Keystone v3 may have different API calls with different domain objects, so changing API version property could be not enough. Do we need to inject the right

Re: OpenStack Compute (Nova) v3 API

319 > > On 13 February 2017 at 12:40, Ignasi Barrera <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think we can have a smart Guice module that returns the right > > Keystone API depending on the value of the ApiVersion, so we can keep > > both implementations, each one wi

Re: Time to release jclouds 2.0.1

Ignasi, I think Packet can be promoted as well: API are quite clean and we have the account for the live testing. I'd like to fix jclouds-karaf (namely having https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/92) before the release. Otherwise no strong objections! Thanks, Andrea On Wed, Feb 15,

Re: Time to release jclouds 2.0.1

; On 15 February 2017 at 17:24, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ignasi, > > > > I think Packet can be promoted as well: API are quite clean and we have > the > > account for the live testing. > > > > I'd like to fix jclouds-kara

  1   2   >