private String name = getClass().getSimpleName();
private String containerName = getClass().getSimpleName() + Container;
+
+ public void copy() throws Exception {
I personally am not a fan of `testX` names for tests, but that seems to be what
we mainly use in jclouds. So
+ // Create the destination object
+ assertNotNull(destApi.replace(destinationObject, data,
ImmutableMap.String, String of()));
+ object = destApi.get(destinationObject, GetOptions.NONE);
+ checkObject(destApi.get(destinationObject, GetOptions.NONE));
+
+
+ checkObject(destApi.get(destinationObject, GetOptions.NONE));
+
+ // check the copy operation
+ assertTrue(destApi.copy(destinationObject, sourceContainer,
sourceObject));
+ assertNotNull(destApi.head(destinationObject));
+
+ // now get
+ assertTrue(api.objectApiInRegionForContainer(DFW,
destinationContainer)
+.copy(destinationObject, sourceContainer, sourceObject));
+
+ assertEquals(server.getRequestCount(), 2);
+ assertEquals(server.takeRequest().getRequestLine(), POST
public class BaseSwiftApiLiveTest extends BaseApiLiveTestSwiftApi {
+ protected SetString regions = Sets.newHashSet();
Leave uninitialized here and assign below?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
public BaseSwiftApiLiveTest() {
provider = openstack-swift;
}
+ @BeforeClass
+ public void setupRegions() {
+ String key = test. + provider + .region;
+
+ if (System.getProperties().containsKey(key)) {
+ regions.add(System.getProperty(key));
+
Thanks, @jdaggett! Main comment is 3rd vs. 2nd person usage in Javadocs, I
guess - otherwise just a couple of small things.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/73#issuecomment-31789253
* @author Zack Shoylev
*/
-public class Webhook {
- private final String name;
- private final ImmutableMapString, Object metadata;
-
- @ConstructorProperties({ name, metadata })
- protected Webhook(String name, @Nullable MapString, Object metadata) {
- this.name =
Just briefly scanned through this - I trust the refactoring tool ;-) A couple
of minors, otherwise +1 from me if the PR builders look happy.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/74#issuecomment-31789493
Not sure why the PR builders didn't trigger on this one. Could you squash the
two commits? That should hopefully kick them off. Otherwise, +1 from me -
thanks, @jdaggett!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@nirmal070125: ping? Or would it be easier if I simply applied this as a
patch..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/46#issuecomment-31791789
So this is what comes to my mind when thinking about what I'd want to have
before publishing the new site. WDYT?
Any reason to wait before all this is done before merging the landing page?
Obviously, if you think this can be finished relatively quickly, sure...but I
think it would be great
@@ -468,4 +492,21 @@ public CloudStackTemplateOptions userMetadata(String
key, String value) {
public CloudStackTemplateOptions nodeNames(IterableString nodeNames) {
return
CloudStackTemplateOptions.class.cast(super.nodeNames(nodeNames));
}
+
+ /**
+* {@inheritDoc}
@@ -43,8 +40,8 @@ public DeployVirtualMachineOptions
apply(CloudStackTemplateOptions templateOptio
// at least one network must be given to CloudStack,
// but jclouds will try to autodetect an appropriate network if none
given.
@@ -196,4 +190,11 @@ public void testNodeNames() {
TemplateOptions options = nodeNames(nodeNames);
assertTrue(options.getNodeNames().containsAll(nodeNames));
}
+
+ @Test
+ public void testNetworks() {
+ SetString networks = ImmutableSet.of(first-network,
@demobox Squashed and pushed, now crossing fingers! ;)
No need to cross fingers - it's the jclouds-examples repo...didn't see that.
@jdaggett: intentional?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/29#issuecomment-31820389
Committed squashed version to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-site.git;a=search;s=nirmal070125;st=author).
Thanks, @nirmal070125!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/46#issuecomment-31829362
Published!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/46#issuecomment-31832948
Merged to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-examples.git;a=commit;h=15e8825ad8ad3a171f648aeb21ffc1761d2cf8bc).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/29#issuecomment-31865258
*/
public OptionalString getNetworkName() {
- return networkName;
+ return fromNullable(Iterables.getFirst(getNetworks(), null));
I guess this is the bit janky bit? I see what you mean. The user can get at
_all_ networks too, though? In that case, add a `@see` Javadoc to
Another [compilation
failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/41/console).
Was this also an expected one?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/19#issuecomment-31871998
@@ -196,4 +190,11 @@ public void testNodeNames() {
TemplateOptions options = nodeNames(nodeNames);
assertTrue(options.getNodeNames().containsAll(nodeNames));
}
+
+ @Test
+ public void testNetworks() {
+ SetString networks = ImmutableSet.of(first-network,
@@ -114,6 +114,14 @@ public static CloudSigmaTemplateOptions
nodeNames(IterableString nodeNames) {
return
CloudSigmaTemplateOptions.class.cast(options.nodeNames(nodeNames));
}
+ /**
+ * @see TemplateOptions#nodeNames(Iterable)
+ */
+ public
@@ -332,7 +329,15 @@ public static EC2TemplateOptions
nodeNames(IterableString nodeNames) {
EC2TemplateOptions options = new EC2TemplateOptions();
return EC2TemplateOptions.class.cast(options.nodeNames(nodeNames));
}
-
+
+ /**
+ * @see
@@ -260,6 +255,55 @@ public boolean apply(VirtualMachine machine) {
});
}
+ /**
+* Configures the networkking for the created virtual machine.
networking
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/47/files#r8754214
@@ -260,6 +255,55 @@ public boolean apply(VirtualMachine machine) {
});
}
+ /**
+* Configures the networkking for the created virtual machine.
+* p
+* If the template options have been configured with a set of network
+* identifiers, jclouds will assign the
+ /**
+* Configures the networkking for the created virtual machine.
+* p
+* If the template options have been configured with a set of network
+* identifiers, jclouds will assign the virtual machine one IP address of
+* each network.
+* p
+* If no network ids
+*/
+ private void configureNetworking(VirtualMachine vm,
VirtualApplianceCachingTemplate template, Datacenter datacenter,
+ TemplateOptions options) {
+
+ if (!options.getNetworks().isEmpty()) {
+ ListIp?, ? ips = Lists.newArrayList();
+ Enterprise
@@ -269,6 +313,15 @@ public boolean apply(final VirtualMachine input) {
};
}
+ private static PredicateNetwork? networkId(final String id) {
+ return new PredicateNetwork?() {
+ @Override
+ public boolean apply(final Network? input) {
+
+ server.enqueue(addCommonHeaders(new
MockResponse().setBody(stringFromResource(/access.json;
+ server.enqueue(addCommonHeaders(new MockResponse().setResponseCode(404)
+.addHeader(SwiftHeaders.OBJECT_COPY_FROM, bar)));
+
+ try {
+ SwiftApi api =
Thanks for the update, @jdaggett! Skimmed through it a bit more quickly this
time. One minor comment, otherwise looks good to me!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/73#issuecomment-32001727
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ server.enqueue(addCommonHeaders(new
MockResponse().setBody(stringFromResource(/access.json;
+ server.enqueue(addCommonHeaders(new MockResponse().setResponseCode(404)
+.addHeader(SwiftHeaders.OBJECT_COPY_FROM, bar)));
+
+ try {
+ SwiftApi api =
+ public CloudSigma2WashingtonProviderMetadata() {
+ super(builder());
+ }
+
+ public CloudSigma2WashingtonProviderMetadata(Builder builder) {
+ super(builder);
+ }
+
+ public static Properties defaultProperties() {
+ Properties properties = new Properties();
+
+ .apiMetadata(new CloudSigma2ApiMetadata())
+
.homepage(URI.create(http://www.cloudsigma.com/en/our-cloud/features;))
+ .console(URI.create(https://gui.wdc.cloudsigma.com/;))
+ .iso3166Codes(US-DC)
+ .endpoint(https://wdc.cloudsigma.com/api/2.0/;)
+
+1 - looks good to me. So, to be clear, in the test we're just verifying that
```
template.getOptions().as(NovaTemplateOptions.class).networks(4ebd35cf-bfe7-4d93-b0d8-eb468ce2245a);
```
gets correctly included in the create server request?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Just to resurrect this one, after seeing an interesting comment [1] in
a podling review about how a low signal-to-noise ratio on the dev@
list could also deter committers.
According to infra, we should just be able to file a ticket:
17:47] gmcdonald up to the project to choose. 1. create a
Unfortunately the ComputeServiceAdapterLiveTest is still not working in Abiquo
Would this be worth pulling out into a strategy with a unit test, or something
like that?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/47#issuecomment-32075214
This is now:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7180
If INFRA is unable to unsubscribe dev@ from the new list, does anyone
know who here is a moderator who *could* do that?
ap
I think I can, maybe?
Good to know, thanks. Let's see what happens to the JIRA issue and
take it from there..?
ap
OkHttp 1.3.0 has been released including PATCH support.
Nice! Thanks, @nacx!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/232#issuecomment-32170483
PS: Change itself looks good - +1 from me. Thanks, @nacx!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/75#issuecomment-32170908
Actually, BuildHive seems [to be
complaining](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/769/console)
about something else:
```
[ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for
com.squareup.okhttp:mockwebserver:jar is missing. @ line 109, column 17
```
I'm sure the
I plan to open a PR today with an alternative implementation of the
TemplateBuilderImpl
Curious! Looking forward to that...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/47#issuecomment-32171037
+import java.util.Properties;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
+
+import static com.google.common.base.Charsets.UTF_8;
+import static
org.jclouds.compute.config.ComputeServiceProperties.POLL_INITIAL_PERIOD;
+import static
+ public CreateServerWithKeyPair(String username, String apiKey) {
+ IterableModule modules = ImmutableSet.Module of(new
SshjSshClientModule());
+
+ // These properties control how often jclouds polls for a status update
+ Properties overrides = new Properties();
+
+
+ /**
+* Delete the public key in the cloud and the local private key.
+*/
+ private void deleteKeyPair(KeyPair keyPair) {
+ System.out.format( Delete Key Pair%n);
+
+ KeyPairApi keyPairApi =
nova.getApi().getKeyPairExtensionForZone(ZONE).get();
+
[redirecting to dev@j.a.o...]
Hi,
I've noticed that glance is still in incubation, even though it's been
there since nova.
I expected that 1.7 release would include a production glance since it is
a basic functionality for any nova operation.
why is glance still in incubation?
when glance
Become a jclouds Developer?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/commit/10da131f035c6739a1be82142261e315235b1832#commitcomment-5056628
CUSTOMERS - USERS?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/51#issuecomment-32221835
Make jclouds Better?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/commit/10da131f035c6739a1be82142261e315235b1832#commitcomment-5056667
What do you think?
I certainly like the idea of encouraging the reader to do something. Just
wondering if we can make it a horizontal menu in some way, in keeping with most
of the other menus and the general layout theme on the page?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
In jclouds we usually provide builders that return the result of a self()
methos instead of returning this. This allows proper builder inheritance.
See an api metadata builder examples [1] (and have a look at its superclass
too).
If the builder you are using does not follow that pattern
Skimmed over this as I assume it's mainly a backport of already reviewed code.
Bearing that in mind, +1 - looks good to me. Thanks, @nacx!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/251#issuecomment-32270637
I'm not married to it. users might be more appropriate in this case.
My motivation was mainly to avoid users thinking that jclouds is somehow
paid-for software.
If you're thinking about something like Meetup then yes, agreed.
jclouds-pull-requests #507 UNSTABLE
Unrelated [test
failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/507/testReport/junit/org.jclouds.compute.util/ConcurrentOpenSocketFinderTest/testChecksSocketsConcurrently/)
+1 - looks good to me.
---
I do see traffic in the Real-Time report for jclouds.apache.org so I think
it's working properly.
Nice. Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/52#issuecomment-32367892
I'd like to encourage everyone to include code snippets in JIRA for
how to use minor new features that you've developed.
Sounds useful not just for newly developed features, but also in
feature *requests* if users have an idea of the kind of code they'd
*like* to use.
I'm just curious,
I've tried to see if our create notifications@ ticket [1] is at
least correctly specified on #asfinfra a couple of times, but haven't
had much luck so far. If anyone has some karma to potentially move
this along, that would be much appreciated.
I don't know if voting for the issue helps in
-This is a list of providers that work with OpenStack that you can use to
build your Context.
+This pom.xml file specifies all of the dependencies you'll need to work with
OpenStack. Replace the jclouds.version X.X.X with the latest version
available according to the [Release
-* `openstack-nova`
-* `openstack-keystone`
-* `openstack-cinder`
-* `swift-keystone`
+pre
+{% highlight xml %}
Does Jekyll support some way of making a block of text easy to copy to the
clipboard? Or would it be worth also having a link to a Gist or something for
easy downloading?
-* `openstack-nova`
-* `openstack-keystone`
-* `openstack-cinder`
-* `swift-keystone`
+pre
+{% highlight xml %}
I very purposefully didn't use a Gist
True, true. Worth putting a downloadable file in jclouds-site?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@@ -117,11 +117,6 @@
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.jclouds.labs/groupId
- artifactIdrackspace-autoscale/artifactId
- version${jclouds.version}/version
-/dependency
-dependency
- groupIdorg.apache.jclouds.labs/groupId
I'm guessing this is
Pending the PR builders, +1 - looks good to me!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/31#issuecomment-32523495
Zack's comments aside, looks good to me too. Thanks, @jdaggett!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/73#issuecomment-32530108
+ */
+package org.jclouds.rackspace.autoscale.v1.domain;
+
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+
+import java.beans.ConstructorProperties;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+import org.jclouds.javax.annotation.Nullable;
+
+import com.google.common.base.Objects;
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument;
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+
+import java.beans.ConstructorProperties;
+import java.util.EnumSet;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+
+import com.google.common.base.Objects;
+import
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ public void testUpdateWebhook() {
String webhookId = webhookApi.list().first().get().getId();
assertTrue( webhookApi.update(webhookId, updated_name,
ImmutableMap.String, Objectof()) );
- WebhookResponse webhook= webhookApi.get(webhookId);
+
A couple of minor comments, but if this is a backport, address in a different
PR? Code itself looks good to me...+1.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/76#issuecomment-32530686
-* `openstack-nova`
-* `openstack-keystone`
-* `openstack-cinder`
-* `swift-keystone`
+pre
+{% highlight xml %}
OK!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/53/files#r8946375
@@ -163,11 +163,11 @@ public void alreadyCreated() throws Exception {
/** upper-cases first char, and lower-cases rest!! **/
public void getKnowingServerMessesWithMetadataKeyCaseFormat() throws
Exception {
MockWebServer server = mockOpenStackServer();
-
Should be straightforward...just want to check the rendering.
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site fix-typo
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/54
-- Commit Summary --
Looks OK.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/54#issuecomment-32551812
@@ -163,11 +163,11 @@ public void alreadyCreated() throws Exception {
/** upper-cases first char, and lower-cases rest!! **/
public void getKnowingServerMessesWithMetadataKeyCaseFormat() throws
Exception {
MockWebServer server = mockOpenStackServer();
-
I see in Brett's summary email:
The following reports were not received and are expected next month:
...
Report from the Apache jclouds Project [Andrew Bayer]
Did we *miss* this month or is it our turn only next month? I did a
quick search for ASF project board report but couldn't find a
I had to merge this properly just now. I think I messed up when pushing.
All done, though? Or still work to come?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/73#issuecomment-32669617
So, we have notifications@ (in fact, it seems like we've had it for a
while...doh!) [1, 2].
I have now changed the notifications for:
* BuildHive
* DEV@cloud
to go there. JIRA has already been switched over. Leaves a couple of tasks:
1. Change the email address for the jclouds-mirror user
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-site.git;a=commit;h=3c40769e73790cb400750f3a4711dc03732d7c92)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/54#issuecomment-32673950
Hi Inbar
I don't know the Glance tests well, but, looking at the POM, it seems
there may be some other properties you need to set?
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/blob/master/openstack-glance/pom.xml#L38
Regards
ap
Just to show these two side by side:
and
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Just ensuring GitHub notifications are sent to dev@ rather than
private@ while we wait for Infra [1]...
ap
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7213
Forwarding message from private@...
Does anyone have some karma with HP Cloud to get this extended?
Perhaps as part of [1]?
ap
[1] http://apache.markmail.org/thread/atpf4t3bsyskex4z
Subject: HP Cloud - Gratis Status Ending
From: Cloud Support supp...@hpcloud.com
Dear Apache Incubator
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
* @author Everett Toews
*/
public class Metadata extends ForwardingMapString, String {
- private final MapString, String metadata = newHashMap();
- private final MapString, Integer keyToId = newHashMap();
+ private final MapString, String metadata =
As the v1 and v2 contains a different metadata classes, is it possible to
give support to both versions at the same time in a module? Is there any
way of overriding the default value of the service file? Any suggestions
here?
Even though the ServiceLoader spec *does* allow multiple
Which address do we want to configure for Twitter notifications?
private@ doesn't seem the right place..?
Beat me to it, Everett ;-) Thanks!
ap
Which address do we want to configure for Twitter notifications?
private@ doesn't seem the right place..?
ap
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:02:10 +
Subject: Everett Toews (@everett_toews) mentioned you on Twitter!
From: Everett Toews (via Twitter) not...@twitter.com
To: Apache jclouds
If we start going down the path of breaking it out into glance-v1,
glance-v2, and glance-common, we're going to see an explosion of
OpenStack modules in jclouds as new versions of APIs are released in
OpenStack land.
I wasn't very clear in my original answer: I was under the impression
We should also decide which address should be configured for the
notifications/moderation of the comments in the blog!
Good question. Don't have a particularly good answer for that
one...dev@ would seem the most appropriate option so far?
Who is actually *able* to accept/deny comments?
Yes, you need the credentials for the Disquss account, and currently
only PMC members have them
Create a pmc@ group or mailing list, then? On the other hand: we
have plenty of lists already...
ap
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
endpoints: [
{
tenantName: 40806637803162,
-publicURL: https://glance.jclouds.org:9292/v1.0;,
+publicURL: https://glance.jclouds.org:9292;,
Is this a real
Picking up from discussions last year about our release cadence
[1]...would it make sense to try to put together a draft backlog for
1.8/2.0 and beyond, to see what development capacity we're likely to
have and hence what can realistically be done?
ap
[1]
@@ -296,6 +296,30 @@ public static EC2HardwareBuilder m2_4xlarge() {
}
/**
+* @see InstanceType#M3_MEDIUM
+*/
+ public static EC2HardwareBuilder m3_medium() {
+ return new EC2HardwareBuilder(InstanceType.M3_MEDIUM)
+.ram(3840)
+
@@ -118,6 +118,28 @@
*/
public static final String M2_4XLARGE = m2.4xlarge;
/**
+* M3 Medium Instance
+* ul
+* li3.75 GiB memory/li
+* li3 EC2 Compute Units (1 virtual core with 3 EC2 Compute Units)/li
+* li1 SSD-based volume with 4 GiB of instance
+* li32-bit or 64-bit platform/li
+* liI/O Performance: Moderate/li
+* /ul
+*/
+ public static final String M3_MEDIUM = m3.medium;
+ /**
+* M3 Large Instance
+* ul
+* li7 GiB memory/li
+* li6.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 virtual cores with 3.25 EC2 Compute
On this subject...
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Java%207/job/jclouds-java-7u51/19/console
is currently running and looks good so far. Compiles and passes all
tests in core and the first few providers. The required changes are
reasonably small but a bit clunky. See the JCLOUDS-427
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds fix-assignment-message
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/260
-- Commit Summary --
* Fixing an error message about an unassignable backend
+import com.google.common.reflect.TypeToken;
+
+/*
+ * FIXME: remove this class ASAP!
+ *
+ * Evil stuff, adapted from
https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/browse/guava/src/com/google/common/reflect/TypeToken.java#236.
+ * See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-427
Dang. Forgot the `BaseViewTest`. Let's try that again...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/260#issuecomment-33122501
@@ -296,6 +296,30 @@ public static EC2HardwareBuilder m2_4xlarge() {
}
/**
+* @see InstanceType#M3_MEDIUM
+*/
+ public static EC2HardwareBuilder m3_medium() {
+ return new EC2HardwareBuilder(InstanceType.M3_MEDIUM)
+.ram(3840)
+
Hm, a duplicate finder
[failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/520/console):
```
[WARNING] Found duplicate (but equal) classes in
[com.google.guava:guava:15.0,org.apache.jclouds:jclouds-core:1.8.0-SNAPSHOT] :
[WARNING]
501 - 600 of 1315 matches
Mail list logo
