Re: [VOTE] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-08-03 Thread Shay Lin
t; > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:43 PM Matthias J. Sax > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 (binding) > > >>> > > >>> On 7/11/23 11:16 AM, Shay Lin w

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-07-31 Thread Shay Lin
Hi all, It's been a few days, if there is no further comments or questions I'd like to call for a vote. There is an existing VOTE thread if you search for KIP-759. Thank you, Shay On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 7:30 PM Shay Lin wrote: > Very good catch, Matthias. I updated the KIP to st

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-07-26 Thread Shay Lin
bject, but does mutate the > upstream KStream object, what is semantically two different things. It > also has an impact on how we need to implement the feature. The KIP > should explicitly explain this case. > > > -Matthias > > On 7/26/23 4:58 PM, Shay Lin wrote: > > H

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-07-26 Thread Shay Lin
with the > current > > proposal. I think once you make the minor > > updates to the KIP document this will be ready for voting again. > > > > Cheers, > > Sophie > > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 8:26 AM Shay Lin wrote: > > > > > Hi Sophie and

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-07-24 Thread Shay Lin
ple key-changing > >> operators, > >>> would you need to add markAsPartitioned after each one? If not, what > are > >>> the semantics of that? These are the main questions that got me > thinking > >>> here, and will definitely need to be clarif

[VOTE] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-07-11 Thread Shay Lin
Hi all, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling The KIP has been under discussion for quite some time(two years). This is a valuable optimization for advanced users. I hope we can push this toward the finish line this time. Link to the KIP:

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-07-10 Thread Shay Lin
step sounds like a good approach to me. > > Let's see if others agree or not. > > > -Matthias > > On 6/28/23 5:29 PM, Shay Lin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Great discussion thread. May I take this KIP up? If it’s alright my plan > is > > to update the KIP

Permission to contribute to Apache Kafka

2023-07-06 Thread Shay Lin
Hi all, Could you give me the appropriate access (edit Wiki/KIP, Jira etc) to contribute to AK? My confluence and Jira IDs are the same: lqxshay Thanks in advance, Shay

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-759: Unneeded repartition canceling

2023-06-28 Thread Shay Lin
Hi all, Great discussion thread. May I take this KIP up? If it’s alright my plan is to update the KIP with the operator `markAsPartitioned()`. As you have discussed and pointed out, there are implications to downstream joins or aggregation operations. Still, the operator is intended for advanced

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13699) ProcessorContext does not expose Stream Time

2022-02-28 Thread Shay Lin (Jira)
Shay Lin created KAFKA-13699: Summary: ProcessorContext does not expose Stream Time Key: KAFKA-13699 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13699 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug