[ cf-dev ] CFMX Updater is out!

2002-09-17 Thread Lucas Sherwood
Hi Guys, The long awaited first update for CFMX is out! You can get it here... http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/downloads_updates.html L. -- Lucas Sherwood European Evangelist Macromedia EMEA +44 7881 803 170 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Macromedia DevCon 2002 October 27-30, Orlando,

[ cf-dev ] OT: Text comparison

2002-09-17 Thread Paolo Piponi
Anyone know a tool, CF or otherwise, that can compare two pieces of text and return which words have been added or removed from the original. The component can be in any format provided we can interact with it as a discreet object (i.e. I know word can do it but I am not going to install Word on

RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Text comparison

2002-09-17 Thread Stephen Fernandez
http://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/diffutils.html -Original Message- From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ cf-dev ] OT: Text comparison Anyone know a tool, CF or otherwise, that can compare two

RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Text comparison

2002-09-17 Thread Justin MacCarthy
Any diff type tool will do this. For a command line version (with source) look here www.cygwin.com For a java version (with source) http://www.bmsi.com/java/ look for diff Its implemented in one class so should very easy to stick into a tag/cfx etc.. Justin -Original Message- From:

RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Text comparison

2002-09-17 Thread Paolo Piponi
Thanks for the suggestions. We're checking it all out. Paolo -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ cf-dev ] CFMX Updater is out!

2002-09-17 Thread Lucas Sherwood
http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/ L. - Original Message - From: Douglas Humphris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:01 PM Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX Updater is out! Where do I go to inform MM of a bug in CFMX? D -Original

RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Flash and XML....

2002-09-17 Thread Rich Wild
either a typo in the docs or it doesn't exist, poss reserved for future use. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 14:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Flash and XML what happened to -1?

RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Flash and XML....

2002-09-17 Thread Rich Wild
file://E:\your_install_dir\Macromedia\Flash%20MX\Help\Flash\html\30_asd_11_u _to_x40.html -Original Message- From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 14:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] OT: Flash and XML Superb!! Where'd

RE: [ cf-dev ] OT: Flash and XML....

2002-09-17 Thread Alex Skinner
Check out Flash XML Studio by Friends of ED complete XML stuff was written for Flash 5 but most of it works on MX without any problems. Even has stuff on XML Sockets which is pretty handy Alex -Original Message- From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002

Re: [ cf-dev ] OT: Flash and XML....

2002-09-17 Thread Stephen Moretti
-6 An XML element was malformed. Errk! You know it really would help if I turn debugging off for my IP address! -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

2002-09-17 Thread Alex Skinner
You can use javascript to find out the screen resolution then pass it back to the server using a javascript imageload e.g. SCRIPT contactServerobj=new Image; //Create a Server contact object through a gif contactServerobj.src=(mypage.cfm?resolution=+DetectedResolution); /SCRIPT

RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

2002-09-17 Thread Rich Wild
I think JS is the only way. You could get the res and everything you need in JS first, then change the src attribute of an transparent gif to something like: document.myImage.src=resolution_logger.cfm?resolution= + resolution; -Original Message- From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

2002-09-17 Thread Garry Mills
Browserhawk also does it, but it's a sledgehammer solution unless you want all the other bells and whistles Also means it'll work if the client has Javascript disabled G -Original Message- From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 16:10 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

2002-09-17 Thread Justin MacCarthy
Thanks all, Think I'll write a cookie with JS and read it and log with CF. Cheers, Justin -Original Message- From: Garry Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 16:25 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

2002-09-17 Thread Rich Wild
just interested academically, but is there a specific reason why you're choosing the cookie route? -Original Message- From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 16:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

[ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread Justin MacCarthy
Well, it's lightweight and easy as there is only one way into the site [login page] - [home page] and as we already are logging the time / user + other info, adding #cookie.whatever# into the log is easy. We are just getting stats so we can target our next build. Is there a

RE: [ cf-dev ] Logging Screen Resolution - howto?

2002-09-17 Thread Alex Skinner
The image pipe route works a lot more robustedly i'd say you can do some pretty impressive stuff with it. This is how we do the browser detection on Shado Alex -Original Message From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 16:36 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [

Re: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread duncan . cumming
requires cookies to be enabled in their browser. the other method will give you more results. But if cookies have to be enabled to access the site, then shouldn't make any difference. Duncan Cumming IT Manager http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 0141 575 9700

RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread Justin MacCarthy
Yes, we already checked for cookies 99.99% using cookies , those with them turned off, are computer-smart-enough to set a decent resolution (maybe). Are most folks still developing for 800x600? Thanks Justin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread Rich Wild
Are most folks still developing for 800x600? we are. -Original Message- From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution Yes, we already checked for

Re: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread Damian Watson
Our recent research shows that 800 x 600 still accounts for the majority of user resolutions by quite some way (this is for the Department for Education and Skills)... next up I believe was 640 x 480 eeuuurrggghh - Original Message - From: Rich Wild [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread Matt Horn
4.0? damnit At 17:19 17/09/02 +0100, you wrote: Yeah 800x600 4.0 browsers and above. Alex -Original Message- From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 16:55 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution

2002-09-17 Thread Garry Mills
Ditto My laptop's set to that and its amazing how many sites aren't formatted right: friendreunited for one -Original Message- From: Alex Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 17:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen