not that useful for the majority of sites.
thats exactly why I think we need a big old air clearing about them.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 13:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 13:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
CFC's...
Hmmm, maybe they aren't discussed, because there aren't that many people who
are able to use their full capabilities...
What I mean by that, is how many
it comes time to implement Flash Remoting. In fact, my
experience with
component architecture and OOP in general is the reason I was
pursued by a
British Company in the first place.
fantastic! there we go then.
In the scripting (not programming) world of coldfusion, there's a lot of
In the scripting (not programming) world of coldfusion, there's a lot of
fear about OO.
I find myself frustrated by the cfc are OO - but not OO, because I know OOP.
Sometimes is easier not to know what your missing.
I find a lot of times it quicker to write a EJB ! CFCs are great for tabular
=5 )
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 13:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
CFC's...
Hmmm, maybe they aren't discussed, because there aren't that
many people who
are able
I am not sure if it's whether we use their full power or
whether they are
actually not that useful for the majority of sites.
Its interesting. Many developers aren't sure whether their
old apps should now be using CFCs, or any new ones should be,
or whether they should be using them
Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/
-Original Message-
From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 14:32
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I am not sure if it's whether we use their full power or
whether they are
actually
]
tions.com cc:
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was
RE: [ cf-dev ] so
03/07/2003 14:39
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
this is a good debate. i think there's still a big market for ye olde CF
5. the beauty of CF used to be that a complete newbie could probably
install the server and get their first CF page
to use Flash as a front end
(which imho is actually far less useful to most of the CF Developers I
know!).
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 15:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I think Macromedia should speed their site up,
I presume they're trying to show what can be
done with CFMX, Flash etc. but it's so slow
and the navigation's terrible.
As for the product I was really excited about it,
but I'm disappointed about the constant
probelms i.e JSessions and cookies,
!
--
--
Paul Johnston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tions.com cc:
Subject:
RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
03/07/2003
Talking about Books.what are peoples recommendations for MX Books? other
then the Walking Beard Editions?
N
-Original Message-
From: Damian Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2003 15:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I
I totally agree Paul. As someone said a while back, not all
CF developers have a programming background, without real
world examples easliy available and well documented one ends
up programming to what one knows. I assume most of us don't
have time to be bogged down in learning from
15:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I totally agree Paul. As someone said a while back, not all CF developers
have a programming background, without real world examples easliy available
and well documented one ends up programming to what one knows
: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I totally agree Paul. As someone said a while back, not all CF developers
have a programming background, without real world examples easliy available
and well documented one ends up programming to what one knows. I assume most
of us don't have time
to download components, it will take you weeks to
find what you are looking for..
I reckon it's rubbish meself..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf
Started with 5, moved on to MX recently.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
which version of CF are you using?
Duncan Cumming
: 03 July 2003 16:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
Started with 5, moved on to MX recently.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I totally agree Paul. As someone said a while back, not all CF developers
have a programming background, without real world examples easliy available
and well documented one ends up programming to what one knows. I assume most
of us don't have time to be bogged down
]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] CFC's was RE: [ cf-dev ] so
I totally agree Paul. As someone said a while back, not all CF developers
have a programming background, without real world examples easliy available
and well documented one ends up programming to what one knows. I assume most
of us don't have time
21 matches
Mail list logo
